Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    non-essential Chris's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    39,908
    Admist all the drama thats going on in the NFL the Redskins acquire a former league MVP. Why? Are they saying they have no confidence in Portis? This deal doesn't make any sense to me.

  2. #2
    POW! POW! Evan's Avatar
    Post Count
    8,499
    Low risk..Clinton will miss a couple games this year most likely so Shaun is useful there and I doubt Shaun is done. I think he has some traction left on those tires.

    Smart signing by the Redskins.

  3. #3
    Based dirk4mvp's Avatar
    My Team
    Indianapolis Colts
    Post Count
    24,173
    Admist all the drama thats going on with the Cowboys, the Redskins acquire a former league MVP. Why? Are they saying they have no confidence in Portis? This deal doesn't make any sense to me.

    Isn't Betts kind of banged up? Could be wrong though. Also I highly doubt the Redskins are doubting the NFL's leading rusher right now.

  4. #4
    Complete player hitmanyr2k's Avatar
    Post Count
    8,349
    Admist all the drama thats going on in the NFL the Redskins acquire a former league MVP. Why? Are they saying they have no confidence in Portis? This deal doesn't make any sense to me.
    Ledell Betts is hurt and out for a month. Alexander will most likely have a limited short yardage role.

  5. #5
    c'mon fellas, show a little bit of knowledge.

    betts hurt his knee last sunday and may miss a few weeks. portis is still the workhorse, but he doesn't get EVERY carry in that offense. 3rd stringer Rock Cartwright is more of a special teams guy than a reliable RB. So Alexander was signed to take the 6 or 7 carries per game that were going to Betts if he's unable to go.

    if betts comes back at 100%, alexander likely will be promptly cut again (unless he gives them a reason to keep him while he's there).

    if the season ended today, portis would be a strong candidate for the MVP - do you really think that they have 'no confidence' in him?

  6. #6
    I really don't have the answer as to why Washington brought Alexander on board at this point. I suppose it was for some insurance in case CP were to go down and to just have the additional depth in the backfield. I wouldn't say it was a poor signing though.

  7. #7
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    Post Count
    28,298
    Its a good move. Low risk. If it works, great, if not, no real harm done.

  8. #8
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    Post Count
    74,377
    I like it if portis was ok with it

  9. #9
    I like it if portis was ok with it

  10. #10
    Bernoullin' niggas! BUMP's Avatar
    My Team
    Tampa Bay Buccaneers
    Post Count
    9,328
    i am a Cowboy fan and i have to admit this was actually a smart pickup for the Skins. with Betts banged up they really dont have a backup and everyone needs a backup. when you can sign the NFL's MVP from two years ago for the cheap to fill your spot, then thats a decent deal. he cant be THAT washed up can he?

  11. #11
    this is NOT going to be a joint backfield - at least no more than it was before.

    the redskins had a grand total of 2 healthy RBs available for sunday - and one of them has fumbling issues (cartwright).

    it's a no-risk situation because they were going to have sign somebody for depth.

    Portis is still going to see the ball 20-25 times per game.

  12. #12
    POW! POW! Evan's Avatar
    Post Count
    8,499
    I think its a great signing by the Redskins. There is no flaw to it whatsoever.

  13. #13
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    28,727
    Alexander is DONE. The skins gain nothing from this signing.

  14. #14
    Alexander is DONE. The skins gain nothing from this signing.
    except another body to spell portis for a few carries a game.

    repeat - without betts, they don't have a full complement of RBs. they had to sign somebody. and while alexander may have zero left in the tank, every RB out on the street right now is also severely flawed in some manner. at least alexander has some ties to this offense, so he can hit the ground running so to speak.

  15. #15
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    28,727
    If you're looking for somebody to run 2 yards and then fall down, then Alexander is your man!

  16. #16
    as long as there is not a fumble involved, that's pretty much exactly what they're looking for. anything else is gravy.

  17. #17
    GTL: Gym, Tan, Laundry Thunder Dan's Avatar
    Post Count
    7,666
    I feel sorry for him this week if he plays- the Browns are about to open up a can on his ass. I'm thinking 8 carries for -10 yards

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •