Reply With Quote
damn you are dumb...and quit referring to oregon state as a team.
If you aren't sure, then how are you so sure we aren't deserving of a BCS birth?
damn you are dumb...and quit referring to oregon state as a team.
Damn, that was actually a pretty good slap. And a pretty lame you slapped.
why do you insist on being stupid? do you enjoy it? do you have a choice? obviously, oregon state has gotten much much better since they played stanford and penn state...are you blind? and why does everyone ignore the fact that they beat utah in utah...or should have at least. and i don't mean they blew it, i mean the refs stole it i.e. oklahoma at oregon.
maybe you've heard of teams improving as the seasons progress , maybe you haven't. then don't pretend to know college football.
kinda like Tech has done?
People tend to forget that we're talking about 18-22 year old kids here. A positive pregnancy test or a rough prof can change a mood faster than their strength of schedule. Of course they improve as the season unfolds. My take is that the P10 hasn't been a bellcow of strength lately and Eastern Football takes that as a sign of weakness.
And the fact of the matter is that each team has to play their schedule. They didnt ask for it, the AD did.
are you that insecure about tekk? of course they have gotten, i don't recall anyone saying they hadn't...and we aren't talking about tekk.
Oregon St has one win that makes them even worthy of being considered a top 30 team. Otherwise they would have 4 losses and no one would even know who they were. After they lose to a very medicore Zona today it will again be shown how ordinary they are, just like the P10 in general. The P10 can't have more than 5 bowl teams even at 6-6, has 2 of the worst teams in the entire Div I of football, and its possible to have a 3-loss champion who could have pretty much already wrapped up the P10 if they hadn't lost to Stanford. Please, don't even try to make yourself look like any more of an idiot by trying to legitimize it. Trying to pump up a team that beat you just so it won't look so bad on you is so grade school.
youve made comments about Tech not "arriving" yet, so that was just as good a place to interject. Its not like this thread is not allowed to have Tech in discussion.
all aboard the bitter bus!
1) i doubt Oregon State loses to Arizona
2) you didn't really say anything other than you don't think Oregon State will win today...
...you're trying to make Oregon State out to be this non-deserving crappy team...they aren't. they are easily a top 20 team and better than utah.
not only did Oregon State win, they won without their starting QB and RB...pretty amazing. props to them, one more victory and they go to the rose bowl...which would give SC a chance to beat up on a big 12 or sec team, i hope.
I wasn't impressed with the Beavs having to come back to beat Arizona until I heard the Quizz went down. Didn't know about their QB. The question is will they be available against Oregon.
yep, it was actually quite impressive. not sure why Moevao was out, but Jacquizz got hurt in 1st quarter! quizz is there best player and Moevao has got to be 3rd or 4th, plus the added problem of losing your signal caller.
it was more than impressive. plus, you have to remember capt. head said the Beavs would lose...hilarious.
well that part is always fun.
coaches poll:
1) bama
2) O ING U
3) florida (gotta reward the SEC when they beat the citadel)
4) Texas
This is bunk, the sooners and their chicken ing wannabecowboy asses
AP:
1) bama
2) Florida (Can't go too long without tasting Urban )
3) OU
4) UT
OU was torching teams by an even bigger margin before the RRS, and now we're supposed to all believe they're just playing better and better are in some way even more dominant than they ever been.
I ing hate ou
Again, you should care less about where Florida is. Even if they were #4, they would go to the championship game for beating Alabama.
OU over UT is what sucks.
Yeah I get that, but its still pretty ridiculous to bump a team that beat the citadel over a team that is wrecking shop and just happened to not be playing that week.
Let's just face it, the media and coaches want to see Urban vs Stoops for the le and celebrate the 10th annual OU bowl blowout loss.
Not to mention that Bradford think they should reward the "hottest" team. How has the "hottest" team worked out this year for teams? What the does "hottest" team mean anyway and why should it matter? Somebody brought this up on Orangebloods this afternoon.
I surely do remember this when it happened and not only did Cowlishaw go crazy on this. But so did ESPN with Trev and Mark May.It did happen. It occurred for two weeks in 2002. Texas had lost to OU 35-24 at the RRS, and then a couple weeks later OU went to aggy and got upset. In the coaches poll the next week, 1-loss Texas was voted ahead of 1-loss OU.
The national media went ballistic over it, and even the local newspapers, including a certain DMN writer (Cowlishaw) -- who today has a column trying to justify OU being ranked over Texas -- writing a column calling it "a travesty," and "injustice," and called for the "elimination of the coaches poll." Now that the shoe is on the other foot, he STILL believes OU should be ranked ahead of Texas. Like Bohls, Cowlishaw is another UT grad who bends over backwards to appear impartial but just ends up screwing over his alma mater. You can google a similar column by Jimmy Burch of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram from that same week in 2002 which also attacks the coaches for voting a 1-loss Texas ahead of a 1-loss OU that OU had already beaten.
Anyway, that "travesty" in 2002 went away when Texas went into Lubbock and lost 42-38 a week later.
But where is the outcry over the same thing today? I'm still waiting.
mark may is a ignorant piece of
he's like a more pompous less legit tom tolbert
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
