LMAO harrell 2

[I Love Me Some Me]

, I'm probably talking with the same types of bandwagon homers that didn't even go to UT or A&M......

it would figure as much.

Why do you figure it's only UT and A&M types that didn't think Harrell was that good? Just look at the vote tally...it's pretty clear there were a lot more people who thought that way than just Horns and Ags.

[Blake]

Why do you figure it's only UT and A&M types that didn't think Harrell was that good? Just look at the vote tally...it's pretty clear there were a lot more people who thought that way than just Horns and Ags.

I thought I explained this to you in the other thread.

Nobody is saying Harrell was going to win. The only thing point is that Harrell deserves to go. There is no formal rule about how many votes you need to have before you get an invite. It's as screwed up a system as the BCS.

If you need some national media types that are talking about how Harrell got screwed out of an invitation, there are plenty of them and I'll be glad to p.m. them to you or anyone else that wants a serious discussioin about it.

[I Love Me Some Me]

I thought I explained this to you in the other thread.

Nobody is saying Harrell was going to win. The only thing point is that Harrell deserves to go. There is no formal rule about how many votes you need to have before you get an invite. It's as screwed up a system as the BCS.

If you need some national media types that are talking about how Harrell got screwed out of an invitation, there are plenty of them and I'll be glad to p.m. them to you or anyone else that wants a serious discussioin about it.

The Heisman committee looks for a clear breaking point.

After Tebow...it was pretty clearly broken. You can say that in your opinion Harrell deserved more votes, but based on the votes he got there's no way you can say he deserved an invitation as a finalist. He wasn't even close.

[cash459]

Goddammit you . Crabtree was the BEST ING PLAYER IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL PERIOD CAN YOU HEAR ME SCREAMING AT YOU MORON!!!!!!! Yes, he should be pissed that he was left off the ballot. It's great logic. The best player should be pissed off when he isn't recognized as such.

not that it matters, but fyi....Crabtree finished 5th in the voting.

And what the point of having the heisman, when you have the maxwell & davey o'brian awards that basically all represent the same thing.

its stupid & redundant. Its like little league where they pass out trophys to everyone. lol

[Blake]

not that it matters, but fyi....Crabtree finished 5th in the voting.

And what the point of having the heisman, when you have the maxwell & davey o'brian awards that basically all represent the same thing.

its stupid & redundant. Its like little league where they pass out trophys to everyone. lol

Can't you read?

Kermie is screaming that Crabtree is the best player in college football and you are a if you don't agree........even if he did finish 5th.

LOUD NOISES

[MajorMike]

This is the perfect example of why people hate ttek fans.

[Jdspur20]

lol 213 heisman points

and tech s think that he deserved to be there... LMAO

graham 39, colt 33. owned. tu s actually think they deserve everything in college football.

[Jdspur20]

This is the perfect example of why people hate ttek fans.

i'm sorry, what example was that?
so because a tech fan is complaining about an ligitimate arguement makes people hate them? your deluisional. this coming from a cow pokie.

[Blake]

This is the perfect example of why people hate ttek fans.

coming from someone that has "better than you" written under his screen name. Perfect example why people can't stand you either.


check who started this thread jackass.

[stretch]

graham 39, colt 33. owned. tu s actually think they deserve everything in college football.

lol, colt/UT #3 graham/tt #7. owned. tech s actually think they deserve jack in college football.

[Doug Collins]

i'm sorry, what example was that?
so because a tech fan is complaining about an ligitimate arguement makes people hate them? your deluisional. this coming from a cow pokie.

What's a "ligitimate arguement"? You must be delusional.

Third tier education for the win!

[cash459]

LOL...39-33....serious "ownage" final rankings dont mean , remember...you have to go to the head to head.

ut fans think they rule the world, including football, but get their panties in a wad b/c they "got screwed by the system"

Tech with the higher graduation rate, ftw!

[cash459]

coming from someone that has "better than you" written under his screen name. Perfect example why people can't stand you either.


check who started this thread jackass.

he's just mad they got worked by all three BIG teams in the big 12 south!

[stretch]

LOL...39-33....serious "ownage" final rankings dont mean , remember...you have to go to the head to head.

ut fans think they rule the world, including football, but get their panties in a wad b/c they "got screwed by the system"

Tech with the higher graduation rate, ftw!

actually final rankings do mean . its the reason why texas is in a BCS bowl, and tt isn't.

personally, my problem didn't lie with the head-to-head matchup so much as it did with the fact that UT played a harder strength of schedule (which included beating OU on a neutral field). Did I feel they deserved to be ranked about OU? Sure. But i can understand why OU was ranked higher. But not Florida. Not one ing bit. Again, they played a MUCH harder strength of schedule than Florida, and their one loss came to a ranked team, while Florida lost to ing unranked Ole Miss. Not to mention, aside from the Alabama win the highest ranked opponent at the end of the season was ranked 17th. Pathetic. Before last weeks games, UT had played the 12th hardest schedule in the nation. OU had the 17th hardest, and Florida had the 28th hardest. Oh, and Bama, who was also incredibly ing overrated, played the 73rd hardest schedule. UT and OU were clearly better teams than Florida and Alabama. I can understand Bama being ahead, since they were undefeated, but Florida? Bull . It should be UT and OU, mainly based on their strength of schedule. If it wasn't for the love affair with the SEC, Florida probably would not have been in. Being completely honest, I feel the top 3 ranked teams at the end should have been UT, OU, and TT. The only reason TT got ranked so lowly was cause of the beatdown by OU, which shows even more reason why there should be a playoff system. Margin shouldn't matter, and while they say it doesnt in the computer rankings, it clearly does in human polls, which is 2/3 of the BCS rankings.

[Blake]

actually final rankings do mean . its the reason why texas is in a BCS bowl, and tt isn't.

personally, my problem didn't lie with the head-to-head matchup so much as it did with the fact that UT played a harder strength of schedule (which included beating OU on a neutral field). Did I feel they deserved to be ranked about OU? Sure. But i can understand why OU was ranked higher. But not Florida. Not one ing bit. Again, they played a MUCH harder strength of schedule than Florida, and their one loss came to a ranked team, while Florida lost to ing unranked Ole Miss. Not to mention, aside from the Alabama win the highest ranked opponent at the end of the season was ranked 17th. Pathetic. Before last weeks games, UT had played the 12th hardest schedule in the nation. OU had the 17th hardest, and Florida had the 28th hardest. Oh, and Bama, who was also incredibly ing overrated, played the 73rd hardest schedule. UT and OU were clearly better teams than Florida and Alabama. I can understand Bama being ahead, since they were undefeated, but Florida? Bull . It should be UT and OU, mainly based on their strength of schedule. If it wasn't for the love affair with the SEC, Florida probably would not have been in. Being completely honest, I feel the top 3 ranked teams at the end should have been UT, OU, and TT. The only reason TT got ranked so lowly was cause of the beatdown by OU, which shows even more reason why there should be a playoff system. Margin shouldn't matter, and while they say it doesnt in the computer rankings, it clearly does in human polls, which is 2/3 of the BCS rankings.

holy crap! That's the most you've ever posted at one time!

is your brain fried? Nobody would blame you for taking a few days off to recoup.

Dont get me wrong, it's all bull crap, but wow......I had no idea you knew that many words. Congrats.

[stretch]

holy crap! That's the most you've ever posted at one time!

is your brain fried? Nobody would blame you for taking a few days off to recoup.

Dont get me wrong, it's all bull crap, but wow......I had no idea you knew that many words. Congrats.

lol, tech education

[Blake]

lol, tech education

ahhh.....that's more like it. That's the 5th grade stretch we all know and love.

[Blake]

fixed it for ya

lol, I only wish I could have a Tech education

[stretch]

fixed it for ya

name fixed

[Blake]

jeenyus!

[stretch]

I lick my nads while ing my face.

[stretch]

I like to edit and completely change my posts like a got.

[Blake]

yeah. you got issues, my man.

[stretch]

yeah. i got issues, my man.

[cash459]

actually final rankings do mean . its the reason why texas is in a BCS bowl, and tt isn't.

personally, my problem didn't lie with the head-to-head matchup so much as it did with the fact that UT played a harder strength of schedule (which included beating OU on a neutral field). Did I feel they deserved to be ranked about OU? Sure. But i can understand why OU was ranked higher. But not Florida. Not one ing bit. Again, they played a MUCH harder strength of schedule than Florida, and their one loss came to a ranked team, while Florida lost to ing unranked Ole Miss. Not to mention, aside from the Alabama win the highest ranked opponent at the end of the season was ranked 17th. Pathetic. Before last weeks games, UT had played the 12th hardest schedule in the nation. OU had the 17th hardest, and Florida had the 28th hardest. Oh, and Bama, who was also incredibly ing overrated, played the 73rd hardest schedule. UT and OU were clearly better teams than Florida and Alabama. I can understand Bama being ahead, since they were undefeated, but Florida? Bull . It should be UT and OU, mainly based on their strength of schedule. If it wasn't for the love affair with the SEC, Florida probably would not have been in. Being completely honest, I feel the top 3 ranked teams at the end should have been UT, OU, and TT. The only reason TT got ranked so lowly was cause of the beatdown by OU, which shows even more reason why there should be a playoff system. Margin shouldn't matter, and while they say it doesnt in the computer rankings, it clearly does in human polls, which is 2/3 of the BCS rankings.

if this is really how you feel, then why such projection onto Tech? Im sure its just to get a rise out of people, which in most cases you do; but overall, I cant say that I dont agree with you. I think youre right on there. the system is definitely flawed & its going to contine to get worse as the compe ion gets better & schools programs start to close "the gap" on each other.