when you have something to say I'm here. that's a waste of time.
but I thought you said they have accomplish more than in UT's entire history?
neither was texas.Uh yeah, the Spurs aren't playing for their version of the NC, as you claim it to be.
I thought you said BCS games were meaningless. See I happen to agree with you, but argued that if their was a playoff, it would start with the BCS.@ comparing the NBA regular season to the BCS.
Calling the man-made NC game a championship game >>>>> claiming any BCS bowl win is the samelook in the mirror, you're calling the BCS le game a championship game
No your argument is actually that all BCS bowl wins are the same so that OU losing year after year means that they'd lose in a mythical playoffs. At least know what your own argument is . . .My only argument all along has been the BCS should be converted into a playoff system and that OU's recent performances equates to getting knocked out in the 1st round every year.
OU last nine years > UT last nine years. Easy.btw, do you see how ridiculous your statement was about comparing OUs recent accomplishments to UTs history. I would think it's debatable that UT's recent history is better, oh I forgot you think the BCS produces a national champion
And lets see a link to a post from you three years ago claiming that UT's win over USC should count just as much as OU's BCS win that year. That's basically what you are trying to argue? You got that link?
They will be there soon enough. They start play in 2011 and I predict a three-peat national championship by 2014. GOTS!
-Lebomb
To which your response that any BCS win is the same.
You just compared it to a national championship.neither was texas.
In your "logic", the two seed playing the one seed is equatable to the first round of the mythical playoffs.I thought you said BCS games were meaningless. See I happen to agree with you, but argued that if their was a playoff, it would start with the BCS.
never claimed that.
(edit: I'm tired and lost it here)
to say I would know for sure would mean acting like you. It's a projection since it's not decided on the field.No your argument is actually that all BCS bowl wins are the same so that OU losing year after year means that they'd lose in a mythical playoffs. At least know what your own argument is . . .
(edit: I'm being an ass because I'm tired, sorry.)
I thought you said it was 1 and 1. Now you're confusing. Last 5 years UT > OU easy. i guess OU accomplished more in 4 years than UT has accomplished everOU last nine years > UT last nine years. Easy.
(hey I'm coherent lol.)
there you go making up stuff. earth to Timvp.and lets see a link to a post from you three years ago claiming that UT's win over USC should count just as much as OU's BCS win that year. That's basically what you are trying to argue? You got that link?
(edit: more me being an ass)
Last edited by 2centsworth; 01-09-2009 at 01:53 AM.
link? but this time read things in it's proper context and don't make it up.
so how do you account for '03 when USC was #1 and was excluded? How about Undefeated Auburn. Do you know your history?In your "logic", the two seed playing the one seed is equatable to the first round of the mythical playoffs.
I'm out Timvp. Good job and I'm sure we'll argue more later.
Hopefully the next argument is which eight teams should be invited to the playoffs ..........
ugh
timvp knew the only way he could ruin my wanna-be moment in the sun with a chode bload thread was to get into a meaningless debate with utfan
ugh
USC would have won a playoff if the Rose Bowl was the sight of every USC playoff game. If they had to play aNywhere else they could have lost easily. Any of the top 4 teams could lose to one another, but congrats to FU for beating Sooner.
Enough of this bull overhyping Florida and the SEC, and the idiots not thinking UT can hang with Florida.
At the end of the season (before the le/bowl games/etc...) Bama was ranked number 1 with a 12-0 record, then it was UT, OU, and Florida all in the next three spots (can't remember the exact order for them).
UT, OU, and Florida all were 1 loss teams. UT had the 12th hardest ranked schedule in the nation, losing their 1 game to a team that finished in the top 10 (and was a last second, bizzare loss). OU had the 17th hardest ranked schedule in the nation, losing their 1 game also, to a team in the top 10 (to Texas by 10 at that). Florida had around the 25th hardest schedule in the nation, losing to an unranked team (Ole Miss...
Alabama was undefeated, sure, but had the ing 73rd hardest schedule in the nation. So Bama was overrated to begin with, and because of that, it made Florida's victory over them, look a lot more impressive than it actually was, which led to even more of the Florida sucking. And even after that game, the strength of their total schedule was STILL lesser than that of both UT and OU.
Last night's game should have really been between UT and OU, of course with OU losing considering they have the "Marty Schottenheimer" of College Football (does a great job getting his team far, then s it all up by outsmarting himself by changing his gameplan from what his team does best)
all of the Florida knobslobbers, and the stupid gots who think running up the score the way Florida and OU did, actually means something. The running up the score crap is ultimately what got Florida and OU in over UT.
^ Yeah losing to 'Ole Miss and Oregon State, playn' in the Mountain West automatically ruin it for me. However, Florida, SC, and Utah did play like beasts coming down the stretch, I'll give them that.
Florida won the national le game, but you still don't feel like they belong?Enough of this bull overhyping Florida and the SEC, and the idiots not thinking UT can hang with Florida.
At the end of the season (before the le/bowl games/etc...) Bama was ranked number 1 with a 12-0 record, then it was UT, OU, and Florida all in the next three spots (can't remember the exact order for them).
UT, OU, and Florida all were 1 loss teams. UT had the 12th hardest ranked schedule in the nation, losing their 1 game to a team that finished in the top 10 (and was a last second, bizzare loss). OU had the 17th hardest ranked schedule in the nation, losing their 1 game also, to a team in the top 10 (to Texas by 10 at that). Florida had around the 25th hardest schedule in the nation, losing to an unranked team (Ole Miss...
Alabama was undefeated, sure, but had the ing 73rd hardest schedule in the nation. So Bama was overrated to begin with, and because of that, it made Florida's victory over them, look a lot more impressive than it actually was, which led to even more of the Florida sucking. And even after that game, the strength of their total schedule was STILL lesser than that of both UT and OU.
Last night's game should have really been between UT and OU, of course with OU losing considering they have the "Marty Schottenheimer" of College Football (does a great job getting his team far, then s it all up by outsmarting himself by changing his gameplan from what his team does best)
all of the Florida knobslobbers, and the stupid gots who think running up the score the way Florida and OU did, actually means something. The running up the score crap is ultimately what got Florida and OU in over UT.
Tech got their asses kicked, UT needed a last second play against a crappy coached overrated Ohio St team, OU got the heisman slapped out of their hands and Okie St doesn't belong in the top 25 let alone the top 10 when they played Tech and UT. The Big XII was overrated all year long.
Leave the critical thinking to those that don't go home on the short bus at lunch time and go back to starting your lmao Blake threads, you flaming worthless excuse of a troll.
God I hope you are right.
Hopefully the next argument is which eight teams should be invited to the playoffs ..........
Bingo.
+ 1 million
Either way, Tech = poo.
and it must kill UT fan that a piece of crap team like Tech knocked the teeth out of Colt McCoy
oh yeah, and Graham Harrell was named the AT&T player of the year
yay.
Okay, you ing idiot. I'm talking about everything leading UP to the game. I never said a word about my feelings AFTER that game, other than the fact that OU would have choked against whomever they played, cuz Stoops is an idiot. I feel that Texas would have given them a MUCH better game, as Texas in recent years has consistently proven that they do show up in the big games when it counts most. They may not win by huge margins, but that really doesn't matter at this point. The Patriots won all three of their Super Bowl by only 3 points each, doesnt change the fact that they are among the greatest teams ever.Florida won the national le game, but you still don't feel like they belong?
Tech was overrated to begin with. UT won the game, did they not? OSU might be overrated, but they are still a good team. Florida is overrated too, so whats the big deal? OU choked as usual, but it wasn't Bradfords fault at all (both picks were off of drops/bobbles), and Tebow didn't really play all that great himself. However, Bradford did look a little shaky, especially in the second half. But he's only a softmore. The only reason Florida was even in the position to play for a NC is cuz of all the SEC sucking. Florida beat an OU team (who for some reason didn't play the style they had played all season to make them the most prolific offense in NCAA history) by 10 points, the same margin as Texas beat them by (when OU was playing at the high level they were playing at, prior to the NC game). Florida did not look impressive in last nights game at all though, not any more impressive than Texas did in their Fiesta bowl win.
LMAO blake
LMAO tech
LMAO jealous of UT
lol, greatest award in tech history
Tech = steaming pile of dog poo. Harrell = piece of corn in poo. Crabtree = kid who had dream about eating poo. Leach = King Poo of Pirates.
therrre we go......right on cue.
moron.
kermit = king of poo trolls
you mean like in Lubbock? or are you talking about the Alamo or Holiday Bowls?
tool.
pfft. timvp already addressed this. You are a moron.Tech was overrated to begin with. UT won the game, did they not? OSU might be overrated, but they are still a good team.
Florida won the big game and beat the #1 team in the country. they are only overrated to bent Horn fans that are pissed off that they feel that the BCS bent them over and hooked them in the ass.Florida is overrated too, so whats the big deal?
what a honk.
Florida did not look impressive in last nights game at all though, not any more impressive than Texas did in their Fiesta bowl win.
and Florida wasn't playing a weak Ohio State team now, were they?
Goob job.
What a whiny loser.
You know who looked impressive? USC. They demolished a team that beat Ohio State AT Ohio State.
USC >>>> UT
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
