Reply With Quote
You're like a broken record. Dude needs to chill and realize most Spurs fans dont give a rat's ass about the past. I personally dont dwell on loses after the second day let alone that happened years ago.
So Lebron initiated contact and the headbutt was ever so slight? I have good Detroit used car for sale for you.
DPG21920, grab a Snickers bar.Was the Wade heatbutt a good no call as well?
And we all know how these calls would have went had Pinky Boi Kobe been on the recieving end of both headbutts.
You're like a broken record. Dude needs to chill and realize most Spurs fans dont give a rat's ass about the past. I personally dont dwell on loses after the second day let alone that happened years ago.
In any given game, there can be dozens of headbutts, of varying degree of contact, during play. This one was a love tap compared to real physical contacts, and the type I would guess rarely would be called, even for superstars like LeBron.
As for LeBron not leading with his right arm, did you watch the video? I don't know how you can argue that he didn't. Not a foul on LeBron, but not a foul on Ariza either for that body contact.
Everyone "leads" with an arm, it is a natural movement. The extension is what normally gets called. He did not extend to any degree to warrant a foul at all. As I said, the contact was minimal, but reaching in is a foul on its own, let alone with any kind of head contact.
Only seems worse because it comes after the massive headbutt from Kobe to Wade that was ignored. Just wierd because I have not seen that many headbutts at all that I can remember this year. Not a big deal, but it is fun to see Laker fans complain about calls and then defend certain other things.
Well, why put words in my mouth then? I never said "extended." I said LeBron "led" with his arm, which he did. He created the contact. I just said it wasn't a foul on LeBron either. Just not a foul on Ariza for the body contact. And reaching is not a foul on its own if there isn't initiated body contact on the defender reaching. That was my point to begin with. The head contact was about as minimal as you can get and wasn't very noticeable except for LeBron's reaction. If LeBron didn't flop and dive, you wouldn't even argue the point. It was clearly a flop in an attempt to get a call.
It is a flop indeed. If you look at the replay, he clearly holds his head right after he noticed the ball was about to change possession, trying to sell the foul.
dude i posted a video about Lebron and Ariza and you freakin turn it into a kobe hate fest as like every other thread you post on. Your hate for Kobe runs so deep you think it was Kobe who "traveled" in the spurs game when it was Trevor Ariza.
is fun to see Spurs fans complain about calls and then defend certain other things
ok...works both ways
Like I said, before you try and understand what any Spur fan says you must first understand how deep their hatred for the Lakers is because the Lakers have destroyed them in the playoffs so many times this decade. Once you understand that, it's easy to see why their takes are so misguided.
I do not hate Kobe at all. You obivously suck at reading. I know the last play of the game was called on Ariza. I was talking about during the Spurs game when Kobe clearly walked through the lane and hit a floater.
I was the one who posted the you tube video of the Ariza "travel" and said IT WAS A BAD CALL.
ing Pwned.
How many rings do the Lakers have in the past decade? Spurs? Just because teams have a rivalry does not mean you hate everyone. I greatly admire the Lakers and show them the most respect. I post fairly. I have already explained that it is the Laker's fans that most people have a problem with.
How many victories do the Spurs have against the Lakers in the past decade? Spurs?
4-1
1999-2009
Drhouse is a complete idiot. Welcome to my ignore list.
Congrats on winning the I beat the Spurs in the playoffs trophy.
I had to watch the video 4 times before I could be sure if there was any contact. Also, I can't tell who would be at fault.
2 things though, he didn't react to it until the ball was turned over, and the score wasn't close. I don't remember what the announcers said about it, I was channel surfing around this time to catch a bit of the Lost marathon on Sci-Fi. So, looks like a good non-call.
The Lakers will win the Team of the Decade le too
Except the Spurs have more championships in the last 10 years and the best winning % out of any sports franchise in the United States. Good try though.The Lakers will win the Team of the Decade le too
If the Lakers win one more they will win Team of the Decade. spurs would just win the best winning % trophy.
If the Lakers win one more it will be 4-4 with the winning % going to the Spurs. How will they be considered the team of the decade and bump the Spurs out?
Spurs since their first chip have not had any tank years. They have always won 50+ games .
Spurs were knocked out in the first round in the 2000 playoffs, after their first chip.
I edited that bc I remember Duncan was hurt that playoffs.
1999 is not in the 2000 decade.
Interesting how the pain doesn't set in until after he loses the ball.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions