The Lakers WHERE better last year, but that doesnt change the fact that if Manu was healthy it wouldnt have been such a blowout, never mind the Fisher no call.
I already know what your going to say, you guys didnt have Bynum or Ariza, but thats a completely baseless complaint. Bynum or Ariza for the Lakers is not what Manu is for the Spurs. Take away Kobe and you have an arguement but Bynum and Ariza being out doesnt impact the game for the Lakers as much as Manu being inured to the point he porbably should have been out for the Spurs.
Lakers where better last year, they would have won if we had a 100% Manu or not.
This year the Spurs have a more-than-servicable suprise backup PG as well as Roger Mason Jr. who is proving to be arguable the best pickup of the offseason. Bonner is playing pretty good, much better than Horry last year IMHO.
This is a different Spurs team who is still learning their new iden y. Same for the Lakers getting Bynum and Ariza back. Basing your arguements that the Lakers will dominate the Spurs on last years WCF's is an excercize in idiocy.