Reply With Quote
What's your problem Duff? Let God judge Angel Luv accordingly, and you worry about your own life instead of hers.
God blah, blah blah, God, blah. The only issue here is the use of the money.
What's your problem Duff? Let God judge Angel Luv accordingly, and you worry about your own life instead of hers.
Wow dude, I have never seen you this pissed...
pro-lifers.
I'm sorry I was so mean with that post. Jesus certainly wouldn't approve so please accept my apology guys. I just think that if people recognize their current lifestyle can't support properly raising another human life, then they shouldn't bring a child into this world and then have it suffer through a ty childhood, throw it into adoption or whatever.
It's the best way to get more hippie guitarists.
Pro lifers favor the unborn over the actual living poor children. We want them all to be born they clamor! Just don't ask them for one penny to fund the social programs to feed those children!...
It's the best way to get more hippie guitarists.
Provide a link for the readers of this thread that substantiates your charge that the pro-life crowd is dead-set against feeding poor children.
If you can't, thanks for injecting the hogwash into the discussion.
There's actually good money in having a baby and selling it off to certain adoption agencies.
It's not hogwash at all, the otherwise bloodthirsty and incompassionate political nature of most pro-lifers leaves a lot to be desired in terms of moral congruity.
Do you really need a link? Southern Strategy and Reaganomics aside, every republican on this board has screamed about socialism at some point or another; which basically translates to: poor black people and their kids.
Last edited by balli; 01-25-2009 at 02:55 AM.
That's kinda racist
you forgot the trailer trash and the messicans
Gotta have people to fight your wars.
A charge was levied against the pro-life group that said they were against feeding poor children. No proof of that was submitted, and that's because there is nothing out there that would substantiate that nonsense.
Nothing more than hysterical hyperbole from you and George. Must be some new epidemic you two have been struck with.Do you really need a link? Southern Strategy and Reaganomics aside, every republican on this board has screamed about socialism at some point or another; which basically translates to: poor black people and their kids
Sorry Jochhe but I'm not the one making posts about Obamas abortion policy. I've never made a thread to specifically say that Angel_luv is doing this and that and that god will judge her and blah blah blah.
Don't turn the question I had on me because I haven't for a single second criticised her for no reason.
Yes, it is ed up that you are for killing innocent babies. That is a complete rejection of God! To say otherwise is a flat out lie.
I never understood how lib s can be for abortion and against the death penalty? Kill the innocent and protect the guilty?
Talk about ed Up!
No, you just don't get it.
To aid in a cir stance that causes problems is to promote more of the same poor choices. It's called tough love.
Make it hard to live with such life choices and less people will make those choices!
No it isn't. It's called neglect.
Neglect is what people do who try to raise children without planning to have them. Don't blame the people who don't wish to compound the problem. Blame the people having babies that shouldn't.
You don't know what neglect means do you?
Do we have to call it pro-life, when most of it's adherants support every war that comes down the pike, and capital punishment, to boot?
A.L. doesnt believe in answering hypotheticals
I'm not a big fan of Mr. Obama, but bless him for this.
No problem Duff.
Never said you were.but I'm not the one making posts about Obamas abortion policy.
Noted.I've never made a thread to specifically say that Angel_luv is doing this and that and that god will judge her and blah blah blah.
She exercised her freedom of speech by saying that she doesn't appreciate that the tax money she pays will be used to end life that to her is sacred.Don't turn the question I had on me because I haven't for a single second criticised her for no reason.
She explained her reasoning for taking exception to Obama's action, yet you chastised her for doing so by telling her to worry about her own life instead of someone elses.
What you refer to as "worrying about someone elses life" is merely dissenting opinion, opinion that is protected by our Cons ution, and although you may disagree with her opinion, you certainly don't want to stifle dissent.
Death penalty and torture are pro-life?
Or are you choosing which lives have more value?
I am pro-life but I have compassion which seems to be lacking in many who claim to be. Many of the very same people who want to protect these unborn babies seem to be the ones who want least to fund any programs to help these women raise these babies once they are born- as if the obligation of protection ends at birth.
Two men went up to the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, 'God, I thank Thee that I am not like other men--extortionists, unjust, adulterers, or even as this tax collector. I fast twice a week; I give hes of all that I possess'. But the tax collector, standing afar off, would not so much as raise his eyes to heaven, but beat his breast, saying, 'God, be merciful to me a sinner!' I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other; for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.
Last edited by ploto; 01-25-2009 at 08:24 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
