Spur fan's reaction on that last second shot by Ray Allen

[DazedAndConfused]

The Lakers have won 8 rings since 1980.

I was alive for all 8 of those so they are all relevant to me. I don't care if you started watching the NBA in 1999.

Last I checked 8 is still > 4. God damn you guys just don't get it.

The Laker franchise is > the Spurs franchise in every way. Your franchise just doesn't compare, stop trying to make that argument. You are failing so miserably.

[crc21209]

Well then let's stop talking about past history if it's so irrelevant. You keep bringing up Game 6 of last year because you have nothing else to say. Your team didn't even play in the Finals and yet you're trying to talk to Laker fans about that game. It's truly pathetic, taking credit for what other teams have done that your team couldn't do.

I'll gladly talk about both teams this season since that's all that matters. The Lakers curbstomped the Spurs in the last game with both teams at full strength. The Spurs simply can't beat the Lakers, they can't stop their frontcourt attack. It's that simple.

The Lakers have beaten BOS twice and CLE once already. They are elite. The Spurs are not.

No matter what you say, you're OUTNUMBERED in here wad, your not gonna brainwash us with your Minneapolis, I mean LA le talk. We could give a , because its almost been 10 years since the Lakers have done when it counts. And why do you bring up Cleveland or Boston? The Spurs havent played either once so why should we give a whether LA has or not.

[DazedAndConfused]

No team should ever be mentioned alongside the Lakers when it comes to Finals appearance failures. Seriously, 15 losses out of 29? The Lakers have been slapped by countless teams in the Finals in its "storied" 60-year history. No other team comes close

Nope you can't talk .

The Lakers have more rings and more importantly have OWNED the Spurs in the playoffs. Your team has lost so many times to the Lakers I lost count. The Spurs are the Laker's when it counts.

[DazedAndConfused]

No matter what you say, you're OUTNUMBERED in here wad, your not gonna brainwash us with your Minneapolis, I mean LA le talk. We could give a , because its almost been 10 years since the Lakers have done when it counts. And why do you bring up Cleveland or Boston? The Spurs havent played either once so why should we give a whether LA has or not.

You take out the Minny rings and the Lakers still have 9 rings.

That's still more than double what the Spurs have.

Stop trying to make this argument that your franchise is better than the Lakers. You're losing miserably.

[ezau]

Nope you can't talk .

The Lakers have more rings and more importantly have OWNED the Spurs in the playoffs. Your team has lost so many times to the Lakers I lost count. The Spurs are the Laker's when it counts.

The Lakers are everyone's in the Finals. 100 percent is greater than 48 percent

[crc21209]

Nope you can't talk .

The Lakers have more rings and more importantly have OWNED the Spurs in the playoffs. Your team has lost so many times to the Lakers I lost count. The Spurs are the Laker's when it counts.

Oh my gosh really!?!?! I did not know the Lakers have been on a 9 peat dating back to 2000. Wow that is amazing! The Lakers really do own the Spurs when it counts then

[DazedAndConfused]

The Lakers are everyone's in the Finals. 100 percent is greater than 48 percent

Nope you can't talk . This thread is about the Spurs vs. Lakers. You can't use other team's accomplishments to talk .

14 > 4
9 > 4
8 > 4

Whatever metric you want to use the Lakers own the Spurs.

Since 1982, the Lakers have faced the Spurs 11 times in the playoffs, winning eight times and holding a 35-18 overall edge in games. The Lakers are 4-0 against the Spurs in the conference final, winning 17 of the 19 games played.

Here's the Lakers-Spurs playoff series history:

1982...Conference Final...Lakers ... 4-0
1983...Conference Final...Lakers ... 4-2
1986...First round.............Lakers ....3-0
1988...First round ............Lakers ... 3-0
1995...Second round .......Spurs .....4-2
1999...Second round .......Spurs .....4-0
2001...Conference Final...Lakers.....4-0
2002...Second round .......Lakers.....4-1
2003...Second round .......Spurs .....4-2
2004...Second round........Lakers....4-2
2008...Conference Final....Lakers.....4-1

[ezau]

Nope you can't talk . This thread is about the Spurs vs. Lakers. You can't use other team's accomplishments to talk .

14 > 4
9 > 4
8 > 4

Whatever metric you want to use the Lakers own the Spurs.

Since 1982, the Lakers have faced the Spurs 11 times in the playoffs, winning eight times and holding a 35-18 overall edge in games. The Lakers are 4-0 against the Spurs in the conference final, winning 17 of the 19 games played.

Here's the Lakers-Spurs playoff series history:

1982...Conference Final...Lakers ... 4-0
1983...Conference Final...Lakers ... 4-2
1986...First round.............Lakers ....3-0
1988...First round ............Lakers ... 3-0
1995...Second round .......Spurs .....4-2
1999...Second round .......Spurs .....4-0
2001...Conference Final...Lakers.....4-0
2002...Second round .......Lakers.....4-1
2003...Second round .......Spurs .....4-2
2004...Second round........Lakers....4-2
2008...Conference Final....Lakers.....4-1

Nope, this thread is all about how your team has a losing record in the Finals. That's all that matters

[crc21209]

Look Faker, we are not talking about the 1980's because the Spurs werent what they are now back then. We are talking about the last 10 years, RECENT HISTORY. So in RECENT HISTORY, Spurs > Lakers. 4 > 3. Making it out of the 1st round EVERY YEAR > Two 1st round playoff exits, 1 non-playoff appearance, and 2 choke-jobs in the finals. Thank you, that is all.

[DazedAndConfused]

Nah you can't change what this thread is about.

It's about Spurs vs. Lakers.

And the Spurs have gotten owned past, present, whatever the time you want to go to by the Lakers. Your team simply can't beat LAL when it counts.

Spurs = Laker's .

[ezau]

Nah you can't change what this thread is about.

It's about Spurs vs. Lakers.

And the Spurs have gotten owned past, present, whatever the time you want to go to by the Lakers. Your team simply can't beat LAL when it counts.

Spurs = Laker's .

Lakers= Everyone's Finals

[sonic21]

The Lakers own the Spurs in every possible way.

More rings.
Better winning percentage.
Better head to head record.

And the list goes on and on...

Who cares? Stop clinging to the past losers.

[crc21209]

Look Faker, we are not talking about the 1980's because the Spurs werent what they are now back then. We are talking about the last 10 years, RECENT HISTORY. So in RECENT HISTORY, Spurs > Lakers. 4 > 3. Making it out of the 1st round EVERY YEAR > Two 1st round playoff exits, 1 non-playoff appearance, and 2 choke-jobs in the finals. Thank you, that is all.

[ezau]

hahahaha DazedandConfused is really dazed and confused

[DazedAndConfused]

Nope you can't talk .

Until your team proves it can't actually beat the Lakers when it counts you can't say . You're going to get thrashed this season again and come up with the same lame excuses instead of coming to the realization that your team is over the hill and your le runs are officially over.

[DazedAndConfused]

And you can't talk about what the Celtics did.

Your team didn't do that. In fact your team got slapped 4-1 by that same Laker team.

[m33p0]

Nah you can't change what this thread is about.

damn right! it's about a fakers fan caring about what spurs fans think about a game spurs fans don't care about.

[ezau]

Nope you can't talk .

Until your team proves it can't actually beat the Lakers when it counts you can't say . You're going to get thrashed this season again and come up with the same lame excuses instead of coming to the realization that your team is over the hill and your le runs are officially over.

Be ready for another disappointment. Your team's not gonna get the championship. Don't give us that Bynum is injured crap or the refs were against us excuse once more. 100 percent > 48 percent

[crc21209]

Nope you can't talk .

Until your team proves it can't actually beat the Lakers when it counts you can't say . You're going to get thrashed this season again and come up with the same lame excuses instead of coming to the realization that your team is over the hill and your le runs are officially over.

Geez you sound like a damn 10 year old I dunno how many times you put that , "Nah nah nah you cant change that, you cant change that." Nah Nah Nah" What are you Akon?

[mystargtr34]

at GayAndConfused telling us we cant bring up the past, then proceeds to talk about championships won over 50 years ago, by a DIFFERENT FRANCHISE.

Youve really outdone yourself on this one GayAndConfused.

[MambaJuice2408]

Even if it was a foul (I didnt see it clearly), good job for the refs swallowing hteir whistles. I dont care what anyone says, games should not be decided at the end by fluke bull free throws. (Game 5 of 06 Finals is illegitimate).

The foul would have to clearly obvious to blow the whistle. The call in game 5 was de able. I don't even think they showed replays of it on T.V. because they didn't want viewers to see how much of a BS call it was

[ezau]

Geez you sound like a damn 10 year old I dunno how many times you put that , "Nah nah nah you cant change that, you cant change that." Nah Nah Nah" What are you Akon?

Akon lol

[DUNCANownsKOBE2]

lol, of course a Laker fan quickly realizes how pointless and re ed the original point of this thread was, so he quickly defaults to the Laker fan crutch and brings up the total # of rings LA has. Of course like most LA fans, he gets this number wrong and needs to be corrected.

Then it just turns into this back and forth garbage where the Laker fan turns on the troll switch and just repeatedly paraphrases "LA has more rings that (insert team other than Boston here)" as their argument.

[m33p0]

lol, of course a Laker fan quickly realizes how pointless and re ed the original point of this thread was, so he quickly defaults to the Laker fan crutch and brings up the total # of rings LA has. Of course like most LA fans, he gets this number wrong and needs to be corrected.

Then it just turns into this back and forth garbage where the Laker fan turns on the troll switch and just repeatedly paraphrases "LA has more rings that (insert team other than Boston here)" as their argument.

it's all about pushing the right buttons.

[Purple & Gold]

the Spurs are the winningest franchise in ALL of sports in the past 10 years

The Lakers will win Team of the Decade

And DazedAndConfused slapped you spurs fans