Flawless?It was BORING and extremely painful listening to him. He was asked a question, then rambled on and on and on for 13 minutes without ever really answering the question! And all the ums and aahs really made him sound intelligent.
For the record, his Q&A was flawless. It felt so good to hear a president actually form sentences into coherent paragraphs.
And lol at Aggie, who ripped my personal God for not using a teleprompter. Bush never did a PC in his life without a set of bulletpoints in front of him. And actually never did anything but read (butcher) them.
Last edited by balli; 02-12-2009 at 02:26 PM.
Flawless?It was BORING and extremely painful listening to him. He was asked a question, then rambled on and on and on for 13 minutes without ever really answering the question! And all the ums and aahs really made him sound intelligent.
Crookshanks, you are openly hateful and re ed. Morons like you don't get to knock Obama's intellect. Not with any credibility anyway.
And I'm sorry answers longer than a bullet-point laden sentence bore you. It must suck to be dumber than a rock.
Huh. I guess I forgot I said it.
Apparently Obama did too.
So did you remember which law any member of the Obama cabinet is currently breaking, or are you going to "forget" that too?
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return and accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and
belief, they are true, correct, and complete. Declaration of preparer (other than taxpayer) is based on all information of which preparer has any knowledge
Geithner believed his returns were correct when he filed them, and all the money he owed has been paid according to the law, so again: which law is a member of the administration currently breaking?
Encouraging to know...that the Head of the Treasury, "believed" he was right and correct and had paid all the money he owed, when he hadn't. That's the kind of person I want directing the IRS.
Encouraging to know that there are sheep out there who believe him.
"well...it depends on what your definition of 'sheep' is"
SIG
Keep encouraging the sheep, SF. You still need somebody to put down.
Your following me around aren't ya? I mean, I like sheep. Got several wool socks... and sheep do make good eating.
But, dude...I'm married.
I hear Mr Obama needs more followers tho...give him a bleet.
My condolences to your wife.
Didn't vote for him, don't particularly like him, and I'm not taking any free advice right now. You're way, way off.
All you guys worked for the IMF before, right?
No?
Ok, then.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Conten...lvovq.asp?pg=2The legislation was written by Democratic committee chairmen with no Republican input. The president covered this up by going to the Hill and meeting with the Republican caucus. But, since Obama had no direct role in writing the package, the signal to congressional Republicans was twofold: Bipartisanship was just a façade the president needed to maintain his approval ratings, and Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid were the ones with the power, not Barack Obama.
The Weekly standard just shredded Obama's first month. But theyre not the only ones. Just check out RealClearPolitics this morning:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/
Dude try citing something other than Bill ing Kristol's magazine and some right wing website. For 's sake.
Wow, right wing websites don't like Obama?
Who'd a thunk it?
I will make a bold prediction that they will continue to be anti-Obama next month as well.
You heard it here first!
maybe he should get the facts and study first before he filed them
if not you pay the ing price
not to hard you make a mistake you pay the price
not rocket science
why do you not run for office
Apparently grammar is.
The American people loved his first month.
God damn!
Obama: I'm going to be bi-partisan. Here: I'll make some concessions on tax cuts and stack my cabinet with republicans.
GOP: You. America.
Obama: Okay, well, we tried, but we'll pass the stimulus without you. And even leave in the concessions we made for you.
GOP: Failure.
realclearpolitics.com is a right wing website? How about all of todays articles that theyre citing:
Are those all right wing websites too?RCP Morning Edition
Obama’s New Deal is Same Old Blunder - Dominic Lawson, Sunday Times
Imperfect Stimulus is Still Best Answer - Mark Zandi, Philadelphia Inquirer
Obama's Train Goes Off the Rails - William Kristol, Weekly Standard
They Sure Showed That Obama - Frank Rich, New York Times
The Welfare Issue is Alive, Alive! - Mickey Kaus, Slate
Nationalize the Banks! We're all Swedes Now - Richardson & Roubini, WP
Geithner Lays an Egg - Lawrence Lindsey, Weekly Standard
Defending Tim Geithner - James Cramer, New York Magazine
The War in Iraq Isn't Over - Tom Ricks, Washington Post
Watch Out for al-Qaeda - Marc Thiessen, Los Angeles Times
The Coming Swarm - John Arquilla, New York Times
Terror War Now Obama's - Daniel Prieto, Baltimore Sun
Islam and the West: Lines of Demarcation - Roger Scruton, Azure
Reality Intrudes on the Drug War - Steve Chapman, Chicago Tribune
Apocalypse Now? Highly Unlikely - George Will, Washington Post
Wild Web Has Some Rethinking Free Speech - Drake Bennett, Boston Globe
Nothing Fair About Fairness Doctrine - Nolan Finley, Detroit News
Editorials
The First Three Weeks - Washington Post
Stimulus A Multilevel Disaster - San Diego Union-Tribune
Bill Not Perfect, But a Step Toward Recovery - Austin American-Statesman
Dealing With A Tragedy - Buffalo News
Idiot.
What else is a right wing website? Hoopshype.com?
They essentially do the same thing.
ballijuana, stop posting for everyone's sake.
Mother er, I will destroy you. I might be a jerk, but you sir, are a ing idiot. And I will never, ever, take orders from a butt-hurt moron like yourself- you can suck my ing .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)