Correct!!
It should be a sexual's right to marry who they want.
I'm glad we agree on this.
sexuals want to the right to marry other gay men/women.
That's all I got for now. It seems to me they enjoy all the same rights that I enjoy.
Correct!!
It should be a sexual's right to marry who they want.
I'm glad we agree on this.
yes
yesYou mean to say that they can LEGALLY get married in Texas?
yesIs that what you are saying?
yesare you sure?
yesare you positive
noso you are saying that a gay man can marry another gay man in TEXAS????????????????????
I never said they should or shouldn't have that right.
The same right you have to marry a women. This isn't an additional provision. They simply want equality. So basically you mouth off again and have absolutely nothing to support your statement.
You are quite possibly the dumbest person here.
They want to marry who they want to marry.
You have that right, they don't.
It's really not hard to understand.
no but student aid does... i mean yeah whites can get financial aid too but a free ride through a university? nah.
i'm not trying to say this nation shouldn't be sorry for the injustices of a ton of people, but what has been done has been done and paying the great great great great great great grandchildren of slaves isn't gonna fix a damn thing. people will get the money, spend it on bs, and then more about the injustices they are facing in today's time. it's just bs.
we should simply learn from the past and better our future as a nation.
You said
Then you couldn't support that statement with anything.
So who exactly doesn't get it?
I'm still waiting for a list.
Then what the are you talking about?
s are funny. I watched RuPaul's Drag Race last night and lol'd at their quirky antics. Walking around all gay and such.
This thread is not going well for Blake
ing A, you are all sorts of stupid.
I don't really give a what they want. Civil Unions give them all the same legal rights as marriage without giving them the additional right to litigate and force everyone else in the world to accept their view.
Of course there are gay priests that would love to marry gays, but there are also priests, ministers, and religions that DON'T advocate or approve of gay marriage. Most of these radical gay marriage advocates are attention s that wouldn't hesitate a second to sue a preacher that refused to do a service they did not believe in.
there are currently no laws preventing sexuals from doing any of those things.
I'm not sure you are a hypocrite.Nothing hypocritical about it. I'm fine with a homeless guy getting married. Fine with him or her seeking a tax break and so on. I fully support a homeless man having every law abiding right as a guy who is a functional piece of society.
You have me confused with a stigma associated with them I'm supporting the homeless seeking a way out not in support of keeping them down.
So basically you have a complete misuse of the word hypocrite as it pertains to me.
You are just an idiot that somehow thinks discriminating against tax-paying sexuals today = non-taxpaying slaves in the 1800s.
Exactly how many states legally allow Civil Unions but not "marriage"?
Of course they want that! But it's only one part of what they deserve.
Denying them marriage is a violation of religious freedom (civil and religious marriages are two separate ins utions). The main reason for denying marriage to gay couples is that all major religions consider sexuality a sin; however, the First Amendment of the Cons ution clearly states that a person's religious views or lack thereof must be protected. Marriage by the state is a secular activity; the government cannot start making laws just because a religion says they should. What's next, should we make taking the Lord's name in vain a criminal activity because Christians consider it a breaking of a commandment? So the legal aspect is the main struggle at this time. First things first.
this coming from the moron that thinks the legalization of whipping a Black slave is the same thing as not allowing a man to marry another man.
you are an idiot.
Look you ing dimwitted moron. I said it wasn't an apples to apples comparison. Its was discrimination in principle. Here in caps I EVEN SAID IT WASN'T AN APPLES TO APPLES COMPARISON.
There are laws that prevent s from having unions that afford them the same tax advantages and spousal benefits as married couples. This is a large portion of what they're fight for. Are you really this blind and stupid.
100-1 you still don't get the last paragraph.
No. They don't.
But forcing everyone to accept the heterosexual view is okay?
Since you feel qualified to generalize as to what "most of these radical gay marriage advocates" are and feel, I can only assume that you know them, personally. Correct?
You can't read. You can't comprehend. YOU ING STUPID BLIND NARROW MINDED FACE. READ IT. I SAID IT WASN'T A FAIR COMPARISON. YOU ING BLIND DUMB RE . THIS WAS ON THE FIRST GOD DAMN ING PAGE YOU STUPID .
a gay man can marry a woman the same as I can.
he wants the extra right to marry another man. Extra meaning that he wants +1 on top of what he and I both already have.
I'm sorry you don't understand basic math.
You are an idiot.
You seriously agree with that? That sounds moronic to me, how can you compare black slavery with Mexican workers? Black slaves were taken from Africa, Kings, princes, priests, workers all were enslaved. They were beaten and they were completely powerless. Thousands of slaves were killed over the years.
Do you see the same things happening with Mexican Workers? Nope. The Mexicanos do very very tough labor but they are not killed or beaten like slaves. And btw, I do not agree with Slave reparations one bit.
I like the use of curse words and giant blue font.
This thread must not be going good for you.
You still have retracted your "tenth of a human" comparisons, so I'll go ahead and assume that you still feel that way.
You are an idiiot.
This is the dumbest argument I have ever read in my entire life.
The man doesn't want an additional right. He doesn't want to marry a women plus a man. Just a ing man. He wants a fair union.
Seriously you can't possibly think this way.
I did it so you can ing read what you failed to read on page one. You're the idiot for failing to read it.
Arguing with me over I already pointed out on the first page.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)