Which statement about gay rights do you agree with more.

[samikeyp]

just let sexuals marry with the same sex... big ing deal... it doesn't affect me in the least. government should have no say so in this matter whatsoever.

that whole "sanc y of marriage" crap is bull ... more than half of straights (not sure of the divorce rates... but I'm sure they're either 50% or close) don't abide by it in the first place.

We have a winner.

[samikeyp]

Right...but pleasure is not the natural function of sex. Reproduction is.

But its a great by-product!

[JoeChalupa]

but its a great by-product!

+1

[I Love Me Some Me]

Again, it's just not that simple when all of us, as humans, use our sexual organs for something other than their "intended" reproductive functions. Straight/gay/bi/whatever, we all for the fun of it.

To use your analogy, we all have made the decision to walk on our hands. The question then becomes why do some of us walk on open palms while others walk on closed fists?

"The fun of it" is the motivation...the question that remains is, why is the sexual's motivation not in line with the naturally intended result?

[mavs>spurs2]

Do you idiots always come in here to argue for fun? I should pull a Mono and get someone's panties in a bunch just to derail this bull thread

[Blake]

Got nothing, huh?

You've provided nothing but your own opinions and experiences. I'm not gonna argue your opinions.

[samikeyp]

"The fun of it" is the motivation...the question that remains is, why is the sexual's motivation not in line with the naturally intended result?

EDIT:

I answered my own question.

[BacktoBasics]

I'm not the one that resorts to shouting curse words and posting in giant blue fonts and I have provided a link to the WHO website which reiiterates what I've been saying: "there is no proof of any gay gene"

but here's a monozygotic twin study for you:



There is no proof of a gay gene.

There is no proof of a straight gene.

There is no proof there isn't a gay gene or straight gene.

There is proof that B2B, peewee and disgruntled lion fan #76762832942823 are illiterate idiots.

Did you actually read the article you posted? Did you understand it? Do you understand that they ran a test and didn't like the results so they polled data from a different pool and ran with the one with a lower %. Then lended credibility to the possibility of it being hereditary at the end of the article.

[samikeyp]

"The fun of it" is the motivation...the question that remains is, why is the sexual's motivation not in line with the naturally intended result?

Different question..


Does it have to be?

[baseline bum]

Do you idiots always come in here to argue for fun? I should pull a Mono and get someone's panties in a bunch just to derail this bull thread

What do you have against discussion of social issues in the Club? You make this exact post in every thread here with any interesting argument in it.

[CuckingFunt]

"The fun of it" is the motivation...the question that remains is, why is the sexual's motivation not in line with the naturally intended result?

Why is the heterosexual's motivation not in line with the naturally intended result?

You've provided nothing but your own opinions and experiences. I'm not gonna argue your opinions.

Considering that I've never presented my argument as based on anything but my own opinion, experiences, and theory, I'm still unsure as to why you ever tried.

[DisgruntledLionFan#54,927]

There is no proof of a gay gene.

There is no proof of a straight gene.

There is no proof there isn't a gay gene or straight gene.

There is proof that B2B, peewee and disgruntled lion fan #76762832942823 are illiterate idiots.

I make two posts and get lumped in with those two post s?

I'm flattered.

[BacktoBasics]

I'm just about done. This guy can't even direct his name calling to the appropriate poster.

No, I've pretty clearly stated that I can't prove a hetero gene.

You are an illiterate idiot.

. Ironic considering that isn't what I asked you to provide. I wasn't the poster who suggested researching a hetero gene.

I asked you to provide research or case studies that conclude or support the belief or fact that sexuality isn't genetically based.

The fact of the matter is that regardless of genetics these are people just like the blacks, mexicans, jews, midgets and whoever else reside in this Country. To treat anyone like less of a human being for any reason other than criminal is disgusting. These people want union rights that are equal to that of marriage. I don't think they give two s what you call it (even if it does open additional doors for prejudices). They're people just like we are and deserve to be respected for who they are and their opinions. I'm sick of people like Blake excusing bigotry on a basis of technical unproven bull just so they can sleep at night.

You're an inhumane bigot if you feel these people should be treated differently. Its an embarrassment to the advancement of our race and society that people like that exist in modern day America.

[BacktoBasics]

I make two posts and get lumped in with those two post s?

I'm flattered.

I am not a post dammit.

[JoeChalupa]

Post s?

[CuckingFunt]

I make two posts and get lumped in with those two post s?

I'm flattered.

And I don't?

I'm confused.

[BacktoBasics]

He's got more posts than I do

[BacktoBasics]

This is an outrage. My father wasn't a post my mother wasn't a post . Its not genetic ok. Its preference to post a lot. Its certainly not written in my DNA unless someone can prove otherwise.

[samikeyp]

And I don't?

I'm confused.

No, you're bi.

[DisgruntledLionFan#54,927]

And I don't?

I'm confused.

Science disagrees with you.

[I Love Me Some Me]

Different question..


Does it have to be?

Maybe. I mean, when any other body part isn't performing it's natural function, we diagnose it and treat it (if possible).

Of course, this is not to suggest that sexuality is a medical condition which requires treatment...

[CuckingFunt]

No, you're bi.

Science disagrees with you.

I'll be damned...

[DisgruntledLionFan#54,927]

He's got more posts than I do

Only one of us changed names.

[samikeyp]

Maybe. I mean, when any other body part isn't performing it's natural function, we diagnose it and treat it (if possible).

Of course, this is not to suggest that sexuality is a medical condition which requires treatment...

Does that also go for heterosexual couples who do the same thing?

[I Love Me Some Me]

Why is the heterosexual's motivation not in line with the naturally intended result?

The hetero is in line with the naturally intended result...procreation. If sex were just for fun, maybe a guy would shoot out maple syrup, or Jack Daniels, or silly string when he s. Instead, he ejaculates sperm who's only funtion is to find a female egg to impregnate.