You make a great point. Some of our worst leaders have been among the brightest and best-educated. I challenge some of you to read up on the educations of Pol Pot, Castro, Idi Amin, as well as those of the (admittedly less-bloody) American leaders (e.g., Roosevelt, Clinton, Bush, Wilson, and Obama. Throw in Churchill as well.)
I don't mean to be anti-intellectual. Indeed, I am for book-larnin. But we need to dispose of this myth that an Ivy-league education and great rhetorical skills automatically makes one qualified for elected office. What about character? What about one's view of the Cons ution? Those things matter too.
And can we not examine the toxic values of many in govt who came from the Ivy League? As my hero William F. Buckley said, I would rather be governed by the first 1000 names in the phone book than by the faculty at Harvard. The issue here is not academic a en (Obama has it no doubt). It is character and personal convictions that I care about. And Palin has them. I am much more interested in those things than in one's personal style, rhetorical ability, photogeneity (Palin IS photogenic, though).