Good for you Pistons, that guy was maybe the worst coach in the league.
Good for you Pistons, that guy was maybe the worst coach in the league.
Yes, Dumars takes blame also, not just for hiring Curry, but for other moves that have had negative impacts on the team and its success.
In each of the coaching changes under Dumars, it was more than just a basketball related thing that spurred the firing/change. With Rick Carlisle, I think Dumars was pretty happy with the job he had done. But rumors circulated that Carlisle was a prick to the office people and that the owner, the late Bill Davidson, didn't like him. It's rumored that Carlisle's firing was essentially a mandate from the owner. But, because the Pistons were able to also get Larry Brown, the story wasn't that big of a deal. Larry Brown was without a doubt an upgrade over Carlisle at the time, so whether the reason for Carlisle being fired, the move could be viewed as improving the team.
Larry Brown was fired in a similar fashion as Bill Davidson grew to abhor Larry Brown. He got fed up with his drama and the talks about him having discussions over taking a job with the Cavaliers. And, Davidson felt Brown milked his hip problem and took too much time off. He was similarly fired because the owner called for it.
I think Bill Davidson more or less liked Flip Saunders. It was the players that didn't like Flip Saunders. Rasheed and Rip basically disrespected Flip Saunders. They didn't listen to him, didn't really talk to him. Dumars made the move in large part because he didn't like how the players responded to Saunders anymore.
With Curry being hired, that was supposed to change. But, it ultimately didn't. The players didn't respect Curry's mind as a coach, and it showed. Part of it was because of chemistry problems after Billups was traded and Iverson came in. But, Curry still failed at things he was brought in to do, improve the defense, control the players, and communicate with them better. Curry was unable to do those things.
But, Dumars absolutely shares blame here.
None of us know how it turned out yet. The Pistons haven't used the cap flexibility yet. And, when they do, we won't know until the season plays out and we see whoever the Pistons get with that cap space and how he or they perform.Back to Dumars, it was also his grand idea to create the necessary salary cap flexibility by dumping Billiups for Iverson. How'd that turnout?
From a basketball perspective, it was a horrible trade. Dumars did think Allen would help. I did too. We were dead wrong. He was horrible for the Pistons. As I just said, until we actually know how the cap space will be used and what those players bring to the Pistons, you and I both cannot make a determination if the trade was worth it.Iverson seemingly caused that entire team to implode. They began to mimic his rather selfish brand of ball. Dumars had to know the affect that acquisition would have had on the team, but he made the trade anyway. What did he get? An large chunk of an available salary slot, a bunch of money to spend in a very weak free agent year.
I will say this, however. If the Pistons don't trade Billups, the Pistons would have been a better team but still not get farther than the ECF at best. They wouldn't have beaten the Cavaliers for sure. They have Orlando's number, but there was no guarantee that Orlando was the only team that was going to be in the way. And, you can't predict injuries to star players. A healthy Boston team still dismantles the Pistons easily as well. You have to weigh whether going two or three rounds in the playoffs for a team that has gone to the conference finals 6 straight years is enough to justify keeping the team in tact or make a move that may or may not work out the current season but open up possibilities to improve the team in the near future rather than wait until the window is completely shut and having to start from scratch. It's something GMs have to determine. Whether or not Dumars made the right decision by that standard, we have yet to find out.
[QUOTE]It was also Dumars who elected to pass on Carmelo Anthony for Darko back in 2003. He also let Okur walk in free agency a few years back.[/'QUOTE]
Horrible draft day. It was the passing of Chris Bosh more so than Carmelo that should haunt Dumars. But I will say this as I have before, 98% of NBA GMs and scouts were prepared to take Darko over Carmelo too. The draft is a guessing game. There are very few sure-things in the NBA draft. And, even sure-things (think Len Bias and Jay Williams) aren't really sure things.
Dumars has made plenty of bad moves, and moreover some of his bad moves were historically horrible in retrospect. You'll still find very few GMs who have done as many good things as Dumars. And you probably won't find one other GM today and maybe in the history of the game that started from scratch and was able to build a championship team without a single Hall of Fame player (I don't think Ben Wallace gets into the HOF).In truth, I have a lot of respect for Dumars as a former player and executive. I guess I'm saying what some others have said earlier, Dumars has certainly made some very questionable decisions and it's always easy to blame the coach.
I don't think Dumars firing Curry means he's blaming Curry, at least not putting all the blame on him. Are you suggesting Dumars should fire himself? Dumars made the move because the players didn't respect Curry and it's hard to win with a team like that. I already mentioned how Curry failed at things he could have controlled despite the trade. It's not all on Curry, but he gets no absolution either. Pro sports is a cut throat, dog-eat-dog business. Curry was in a tough situation, but it was the right decision to let him go.
Part of me feels sorry for the dude, I mean yeah he's a pretty coach, but the Pistons traded away their franchise player for a Cancer, that's a hard job for even the best coaches.
Don't feel sorry for him. I felt intelligent watching him make a decision. That's a bad coach making a million dollars to do it. He stole money from the Pistons.
No, I'm not suggesting Dumars fire himself. What I am saying is that it's clear that Curry was "in over his head" before he even took the job. I knew when he elected to insert AI into the starting lineup, without talking to Rip, that his relationship with Rip would never be the same. And it's not just that. It's, as you've mentioned, the lack of in-game adjustments, coaching strategy and command of the team. Players, at that level, have to allow you to coach them. Curry was trumpeted by Dumars, as a guy who would hold players accountable. It's obvious the Curry never seemed to win over the lockerroom. Then, Dumars didn't do his coach any favors when he dumped AI into his lap, with just a few games into the season. Then, it was all downhill from there. Curry didn't have a chance in of being successful.
Same thing that went on in Phoenix. Kerr changed coaches, and was momentarily committed toward changing offensive and defensive philosophies. Yet, he didn't do enough to change the culture of the team, including the players. The players openly rebelled and the owner and GM panicked. Decided to go back to their original style, yet the coach they needed was in New York by then. Therefore, Porter never had a chance.
In Detroit, Curry never had a chance either, despite being handpicked by the GM. Sure it was right to let Curry go. However, my point is that Dumars should've never hired Curry in the first place.
All that said, who would you like to see as the next Pistons coach? Any love for former Piston and Dumars teammate, Bill Laimbeer?
I'd hire Bill Laimbeer or Avery Johnson
Free bagels and coffee, no practice![]()
Dumars made a poor hire with Curry. What else can Dumars do besides fire him after realizing it? There are no time machines. He can't go back and not hire Curry. That's why the decision to fire him was good, because at least Dumars isn't drawing it out and letting him coach another season.
Curry was put in a bad position. It was going to be very difficult to succeed with what happened, particularly after the Billups/Iverson trade. But, I've already mentioned that it wasn't just about wins and losses. The decision was likely made because of things that didn't have to do with winning or losing, like his failure to communicate and get through to his players, his defensive style not helping their defense improve even though that's what he was brought in to help improve, his lack of leadership skills. It's not only that he didn't win and not only that he wasn't a very good x's and o's coach, but those other things also made it easy to see why Dumars fired him.
I don't dislike him as a person. He just wasn't a good coach. Dumars can take all the blame you want to assign him for hiring him in the first place. But, at least he fired him before he allowed his mistake to continue to coach.
Out of all the names of candidates being thrown around, my personal first choice would be Jeff Van Gundy. That's just me though. I'm sure plenty of Pistons fans wouldn't want him coaching the Pistons. If not him, I would have no problem with either Doug Collins or Avery Johnson. Neither would be ideal, but both are considerable upgrades over Curry. Most of the candidates are.
I'd love to get JVG. He's the top of my list. I was hoping we'd go after him last year. And I'd actually be fine w/ Doug knowing that his message would get tired pretty quick. But I don't think he's looking for more than 2 years or so. It fits. In some ways I'd almost prefer him to JVG as I think he might be better teaching all our young kids.
If they hired JVG, I would love for Rasheed to come back one more year with the Pistons just to watch those two interact. Jeff almost seems fond of Rasheed when he talks about him or jokes about the "ball don't lie" phrase. I'd want to see how he'd actually respond to having to coach him. Lol.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)