If it is important, why shouldn't they got through the Congress?"They" did not confirm him(didn't vote) because they didn't like his views. Not his experience or competence. Should the Congress dictate to the President who his Ambassadors should be? Should they HAVE to vote?What did "they" do to Josh Bolten?WHy not? What should be the purpose of confirmations of Presidential appts? When does the Congress not need to be in the process?No.
Most of the important ones are.
Josh Bolten was never up for an ambassadorship."They" did not confirm him(didn't vote) because they didn't like his views. Not his experience or competence. Should the Congress dictate to the President who his Ambassadors should be? Should they HAVE to vote? WHy not? What should be the purpose of confirmations of Presidential appts? When does the Congress not need to be in the process?
John Bolton was.
UN Ambassador is not a czar position.
never said they were the same thing. There you go again.
So why are you bringing it up?
I believe the UN ambassador and many czar positions should be subject to congressional approval.
then why didn't you about it before?
fukin hippocrit
They were questions. Why do Ambassadors have to have congressional approval, and czars don't? In your opinion, how come some czars do and some don't?
That is such a convenient notion. What if the congress doesn't vote?
I believe the UN ambassador and many czar positions should be subject to congressional approval.
Because some czar positions are more important that others.
Then Congress doesn't vote. Most of the time if they don't, it's a relatively unimportant position like Assistant Deputy Secretary for the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools.That is such a convenient notion. What if the congress doesn't vote?
This guy should should not only be fired but should face criminal charges for not reporting statutory rape. If there isn't one, TX should have a law that the govt. run schools should legally have to report abuse to the principal and police.
So has anyone proved that the kid was 15 and having sex when he talked to Jennings?
And I'm sure the statute of limitations on any such law would have run out after 20 years.
This is beautifull chimp. first we have three different Acorn headquarters giving advice on how to set up houses, we even have the one in San Diego introducing the "clients" to a guy who knows where to get the girls, your cool with that, then we have a "teacher" offering advice to a child on how to carry on a "relationship" with a sexual predator, and your cool with that. Tell me what do you find so appealing about these scenarios abusing the children or do your tastes run more to being the one being abused?
Meltdown continues. Straw men constructed.
What is the mantra of big brother?
the lord says shut up and answer the in question.
What lord?
What are you talking about?
What is the mantra of big brother?
Yeah it's so strange for people to be personally disgusted with the lefts ability to dismiss any morals if it gets in the way of the chosen one's greatness.
Have you found a quote from Jennings saying he thought the kid was 15 at the time yet?
I'll get upset if there is actually a reason to get upset.
“one of the people that always inspired me is Harry Hay.” -Jennings
"[I]f the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what thirteen-, fourteen-, and fifteen-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world." -Harry Hay
You don't have a quote saying he thought the kid was 15 when he talked to him, eh?
Is there a quote where he said or knew the kid was 16?
As far as I know, the only quote I've seen is from the kid (now an adult) saying he was 16.
Now you need to find a quote from Jennings saying he thought the kid was 15 at the time.
Do you have such a quote?
why do i need to find the age? 15 or 16 doesn't mean anything different to me. He was in charge of the kids well being and should have protected the child and not tried to build up his self esteem or be a "cool" counselor.
I means everything legally.
There is no need to, and no use in reporting a consensual relationship to the police.
Actually, in the other thread, it's pointed out that the kid was 16, which was the legal age of consent in Mass.
Fixed for you.
I know, that's why they can't answer the question.
They just can't bring themselves to say "I can't find any."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
