Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 333
  1. #26
    Govt, stay away!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    10,403
    True, but that was then, this is now. Hill has emerged as a much better player. I think SA will hold on to him as long as he continues to improve. (unless he pulls a Beno)
    Preseason and playoffs are two different things.

    We shall see if he has really improved.

  2. #27
    Govt, stay away!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    10,403
    Throw them a bone - IAN.
    3 players for 1.

    awesome.

  3. #28
    Just agree, and shut up! celldweller's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    815
    I wonder what Clippers are offering.

    Camby and protected 1st rounder for Jackson?
    I'm thinking Camby is off the table thanks to B. Griffins injury.

  4. #29
    Just agree, and shut up! celldweller's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    815
    3 players for 1.

    awesome.
    Then we can bring back Williams.

  5. #30
    Ballin' is a habit... TIMMYD!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    6,170
    Then we can bring back Williams.

  6. #31
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    I still think Don Nelson would love to have Matt Bonner in his system.

    Bonner, and probably George Hill and something else would get it done.
    Why would GS want Hill so bad when they have Monta Ellis and Curry running the point already?

    Not to mention C.J Watson as their 3rd PG respectively.

  7. #32
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    I'm thinking Camby is off the table thanks to B. Griffins injury.
    It's only for a month and DeAndre Jordan had a damn good pre-season.

    Clippers trying to get him some more minutes wouldn't surprise me.

  8. #33
    Triple meat, triple cheez DJB's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    1,640
    I highly doubt that we are involved in these talks.

  9. #34
    Just agree, and shut up! celldweller's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    815

    There talking about it right now (after the break) on 760.

  10. #35
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    I see no real incentive for any "would-be" GS trade partner to show their hand this early in the game. It would be smarter to see where your team is closer to the Feb trade deadline. With that said Denver is one team that is known for making big moves early in the year.

    BTW has anyone seen Jax's contract? It's a terrible long term deal. I see a viable trade working if GS swaps bad long-term deals with another team in the same range (plus maybe a low salary player here or there to make the numbers match).

  11. #36
    Just agree, and shut up! celldweller's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    815
    I highly doubt that we are involved in these talks.
    Your right, it's all BS. We all know Pop to good.

  12. #37
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    I still think we could potentially give Golden State the best offer..

    Bonner would be a very attractive player to Nelson, and he's also an expiring contract..Mason would also get PT and fits their system very well, and he's also an expiring contract..throw in a future 1st rounder if we can..

    Since it's not my own $, I'm all for it, but I'm not the one that would be taking on the long contract..

  13. #38
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041

    BTW has anyone seen Jax's contract? It's a terrible long term deal. I see a viable trade working if GS swaps bad long-term deals with another team in the same range (plus maybe a low salary player here or there to make the numbers match).
    It's not terrible. Long yeah. Terrible no.

    7.6 million this year and 8.2 next year is great value for the type of player Stephen Jackson is.

    If it were to come down to it and we needed to get rid of it in 3 years that shouldn't be a problem.Especially to a contender. We did get rid of Malik and Rasho's horrendous contract you know.

  14. #39
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine

    We could add a 1st rounder or /and Splitter if need to be.

    Finley would come back in 30 days as well.

    Would put the Warriors at around 44 million next year with money to throw at a max level player in the summer of 2010.

  15. #40
    Just agree, and shut up! celldweller's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    815
    He's going somewhere before Ginobili is.

    He most likely had it not been for their last minute pullback would be a Clipper right now.
    What timing, they just announced on TICKET 760 that the Spurs picked up George Hill's option for the 2010-11 season.

  16. #41
    Govt, stay away!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    10,403
    Why would GS want Hill so bad when they have Monta Ellis and Curry running the point already?

    Not to mention C.J Watson as their 3rd PG respectively.
    Don Nelson.

    That plus George HIll is twice the player CJ Watson is.

  17. #42
    Govt, stay away!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    10,403
    I still think we could potentially give Golden State the best offer..

    Bonner would be a very attractive player to Nelson, and he's also an expiring contract..Mason would also get PT and fits their system very well, and he's also an expiring contract..throw in a future 1st rounder if we can..

    Since it's not my own $, I'm all for it, but I'm not the one that would be taking on the long contract..
    Yeah, I could see them liking mason but I dont know.

    If they wanted Ian I could see the Spurs doing it, but then your front court depth gets really thin.

  18. #43
    Govt, stay away!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    10,403
    What timing, they just announced on TICKET 760 that the Spurs picked up George Hill's option for the 2010-11 season.
    Good for George.

    Doesn't mean he can buy a house.

  19. #44
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    Why trade so you can have 4 point guards? If Warriors want value in a player back, I see them wanting a big man WAY ahead of having the dilemna of finding 4 pg's playing time.

    I see Warriors trading Jackson for a big man or for cap relief as soon as next year that along with a pick maybe.

  20. #45
    Govt, stay away!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    10,403
    Why trade so you can have 4 point guards? If Warriors want value in a player back, I see them wanting a big man WAY ahead of having the dilemna of finding 4 pg's playing time.

    I see Warriors trading Jackson for a big man or for cap relief as soon as next year that along with a pick maybe.

    You do understand Don Nelson coaches them right?

  21. #46
    hope and change
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    5,749
    manu for SJax + first round draft pick?

  22. #47
    Veteran kbrury's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    1,121
    Oh god we better win tonight or the trade talks will never end.

  23. #48
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    Oh god we better win tonight or the trade talks will never end.


    We could start 10-0, the trade talks won't end until the trade deadline.

  24. #49
    Govt, stay away!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    10,403
    Oh god we better win tonight or the trade talks will never end.
    Why be closed to a trade?

    You always want to be open to trades.

    If Golden State got drunk and stupidly accepted Bonner Mason and a pick for Jackson then you accept and laugh.

  25. #50
    Race for seis crc21209's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    16,204
    I still think we could potentially give Golden State the best offer..

    Bonner would be a very attractive player to Nelson, and he's also an expiring contract..Mason would also get PT and fits their system very well, and he's also an expiring contract..throw in a future 1st rounder if we can..

    Since it's not my own $, I'm all for it, but I'm not the one that would be taking on the long contract..
    Agreed. Nellie would absolutely LOVE Bonner in that system. Bonner + Mason or Fin maybe + a 1st round pick and cash?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •