Reply With Quote
Bonner's worthless. Trading him for a pound of fajitas would be a good deal.
Doubtfull. Pop likes Haislip. he's shown good things in practice. He also has not been as bad in games as the chicken littles in this forum love to make out.
Bonner's worthless. Trading him for a pound of fajitas would be a good deal.
We can get rid of Jackson's after two years.
Shouldn't be a problem considering we got rid of Rasho and Malik's.
That being said 7.6 this year and 8.2 next year is not atrocious for Stephen Jackson.
dude i went to most of the preseason games and haislip imo is not nba ready at all. did you go to the games? oh again, talking out your ass like always.
Well time will tell, but I'd bet that Haislip's contributions this year will be similar to the contributions of Sean Marks. Practice big who allows Pop to run full practices without wearing out Duncan, McDyess, and Ratliff.
Did I go? No. I've seen video of some of the games. I'll take Pop's opinion of players over your middle school mental level.
Jackson is a big guard/SF who can score, doesn't wilt under pressure, plays good d, and has a couple more good years left (which coincides with the 2-3 year max window this team has to do anything). Paying his year 4 salary would suck, but who cares about 2012-13? The show will be over by then and it will be time to play for lottery balls again.
I don't disagree.
I would not be suprised however to see his role expand next year after he has readjusted to NBA level.
Finley and Mason for Sjax doesn't work salary wise but Mason and Bonner for Jackson does work and I'm sure that if Golden State doesn't get anything better would go for that just to get rid of Jackson's horrible contract.
Plus expiring contract they will try to unload.
Agreed.
That would be sweet. I'd hate to lose Roger, but no way you don't do that deal.
They might. If they did great, if not, oh well.
Finley/ Mason/ Mahimni works salary wise. You don't have to include Bonner.
Man. I'd agonize on it, but I'd do it.
Your back court depth though would take a hit.
Guessing they would bring back Marcus Williams...
If the Spurs are willing to take on the money...Mason/Bonner for Jack is absolutely a no-brainer. GS will actually get players that are rotation players in return, so it really wouldn't be a straight offloading of a problem player for them.
Make not mistake...they are gonna want Bonner.
Not really.
We'd have
Starters
Sjax playing 30 minutes
RJ playing 32-34 minutes
Bench
Manu 25-28 minutes
Hairston or Bogans 10-12 minutes
That is 5 deep on the wing. Not even mentioning George Hill getting possible time at the 2.
And I'm willing to bet if Finley is including in any deal it would be pre-arranged to where he comes back.
When you look at Jackson, you see some big shots in 2003 and against Mavs in 2007.
When I look at Jackson, I see also all the inconsistency on and off the court. For example, just after being great with Mavs, he was horrible against Utah. His FG% was 28% in that series.
And not caring about 2012-2013 is quite irresponsible.
Looking at some other teams, I think Jax could be available for a while..
Cleveland's only asset in this deal is Ilguaskas and his expiring contract, and it doesn't appear like they'll be moving that..losing Ilgauskas leaves them with very little size off the bench..
The Hornets could be a possibility in a package for Peja's contract, but would their cheap ownership be willing to pay Jackson for that long?..
Denver doesn't appear to have the assets..
I can't imagine the Clippers doing this, it wouldn't make any sense for them from both financial and basketball perspectives..
I'd rather include Bonner. Our wing rotation would get too thin if we trade both Mason and Finley.
Did we pay Rasho or Malik all of their 6 and 7 year contracts?
Oh yeah thats right we traded them away. Oh I forgot we were able to do that. Wow.
Scroll up to post 95.
And our frontcourt wouldn'y get thin by trading both bonner and mahinmi..let this trade go, seriously..
Is this Ilgauskas's last year? Maybe if Cleveland loses a couple more games they'll get desperate enough to trade him for Jackson, Z can demand a buyout (who wants to play in Golden State?) and come to the Spurs for a real chance at a ring. I wouldn't mind having him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
