Greg Oden vs Kevin Durant

[redzero]

Yah, Durant had such a monster year that the Thunder managed to win 23 whole games! Impressive...

Yeah, and Greg "I miss at least 25 games a year and foul out in ten minutes" Oden would have done so much better.

If Oden's team does better, Oden must be the better player HURR DURR.

[Biggems]

Baloney. Durant will never have the impact on games that Oden has. Unfortunately you're too blind to realize this.

BLIND HOMERISM at its finest.

Durant has an impact in every game. When he is on, he is lethal, and his team has a great chance to win. When he is off, he is such an important part of the team, that his team struggles as well.

As a Spurs fan, Durant has given us fits and even had a game winning shot or two.

If Oden has a good or bad game, it matters not, cause he is not even one of their top 5 players. He is just a side dish on that team. It is obvious that he is nowhere near as important as Durant. The Blazers have done an adequate job without Oden.

The Thunder would downright suck if they had no Durant. He is their franchise player.

[tlongII]

Yeah, and Greg "I miss at least 25 games a year and foul out in ten minutes" Oden would have done so much better.

If Oden's team does better, Oden must be the better player HURR DURR.

If Oden was on OKC this year and Durant was not I guarantee they would be a better team.

[tlongII]

BLIND HOMERISM at its finest.

Durant has an impact in every game. When he is on, he is lethal, and his team has a great chance to win. When he is off, he is such an important part of the team, that his team struggles as well.

As a Spurs fan, Durant has given us fits and even had a game winning shot or two.

If Oden has a good or bad game, it matters not, cause he is not even one of their top 5 players. He is just a side dish on that team. It is obvious that he is nowhere near as important as Durant. The Blazers have done an adequate job without Oden.

The Thunder would downright suck if they had no Durant. He is their franchise player.

The Thunder DOES suck. With Durant. Ask yourself why that is.

[Biggems]

If Oden was on OKC this year and Durant was not I guarantee they would be a better team.

No they wouldnt. They would be putrid. Oden is overrated, overhyped, and oft injured. He is far more hype than substance.

[redzero]

If Oden was on OKC this year and Durant was not I guarantee they would be a better team.

Really? What would Oden be doing from the bench? We all know he will miss 20+ games this season and foul out the other 60 games in 20 minutes.

[My Fault]

Ariza>KD

1 ring> 0 rings

33 points> 16 points

Win against Blazers> Loss

Sounds about right.

Ariza has one 30 pt game and he's better than Durant? GTFO


Oh btw Lebron has 0 rings too....

[Biggems]

The Thunder DOES suck. With Durant. Ask yourself why that is.

Because basically all they have is Durant, Green, and Westbrook. They are still rebuilding. Krstic is solid, but injury prone.

I tell you this. Take McMillan and give him back to OKC and they will be the top team in that division by the end of next season.

OKC has been very unstable coaching wise since McMillan left for Portland.

[tlongII]

Right now Durant is the most over-rated player in the league. Hopefully he'll improve and come close to justifying the hype he gets on this board some day. I just don't see him helping his team at this point. He plays no defense and his shot selection is terrible.

[carrao45]

Dude, you're a Laker fan. By definition that means you don't have a clue.

Can't come up with a way to refute the argument, so he switches to "You're a Laker fan." That says it all

[Lars]

The Thunder DOES suck. With Durant. Ask yourself why that is.

The same reason the Blazers sucked in 06-07 and 07-08

[carrao45]

If Oden was on OKC this year and Durant was not I guarantee they would be a better team.

The Thunder DOES suck. With Durant. Ask yourself why that is.

I believe you mean "Do suck." Seriously, English is not that hard.


And they suck for the same reason the Blazers have no chance at a le, because they are your, inexperienced and a poor defensive team.

[carrao45]

Ariza>KD

1 ring> 0 rings

33 points> 16 points

Win against Blazers> Loss

Sounds about right.

Obviously. And that means that the Lakers equipment manager is a better basketball player than LeBron.

[The Franchise]

This entire thread feels like a good troll job to me. There's no way he could seriously be comparing a bust to an allstar.

[kamikazi_player]

Right now Durant is the most over-rated player in the league. Hopefully he'll improve and come close to justifying the hype he gets on this board some day. I just don't see him helping his team at this point. He plays no defense and his shot selection is terrible.

Overrated yes, Oden better than Durant?

[superfedja]

yo REDZERO !

what the is the name of that insect on your picture ????????

that's thing looks scary and extremely effective !

[tlongII]

The same reason the Blazers sucked in 06-07 and 07-08

The Blazers won 33 games in 06-07 and were a .500 team in 07-08.

[tlongII]

I believe you mean "Do suck." Seriously, English is not that hard.


And they suck for the same reason the Blazers have no chance at a le, because they are your, inexperienced and a poor defensive team.

Actually "does suck" is the correct english to use in this example. But I'll keep in mind that you're a Laker fan.

[superfedja]

Oden is better than Durant he just doesn't stay as long on the court, once he handles his fouling problem, he's gonna be unstoppable because he's extremely effective when he's on the floor ... the blazers are always winning while he's on the floor .... don't forget, this is not shaq, this guy hits his free throws, so once he can stay on the floor long enough, which he will learn to do, he will be unstoppable ... on both ends of the court ... now that's a scary thought for everyone lol

[Lars]

The Blazers won 33 games in 06-07 and were a .500 team in 07-08.

and?

If you want to compare Durant to someone, compare him to Roy.

[tlongII]

and?

If you want to compare Durant to someone, compare him to Roy.

They didn't suck.

[Agloco]

Oden with 12 points, 10 boards, and 1 blocked shot on 4-5 shooting and 4-4 from the line.


Durant with 16 points, 5 boards, and 2 blocked shots on 3-21 shooting.


Of course you dummies still argue we should have picked Durant.

I smell desperation. I see a person trying to convince himself that his team didn't draft Sam Oden or Greg Bowie.

[carrao45]

The Blazers won 33 games in 06-07 and were a .500 team in 07-08.

Since when does winning 33 games not suck?

[carrao45]

Actually "does suck" is the correct english to use in this example. But I'll keep in mind that you're a Laker fan.

The Thunder do suck


The Thunder does suck


If you're using Thunder as an object, meaning the noise that follows lightning, the "Does suck" is correct.

However, when talking about the Thunder as a collective group, or team, then it is considered plural, and "Do suck" is the correct way to say it.




Dumbass tlong

[tlongII]

Since when does winning 33 games not suck?

A .500 team does not suck.