I laughed my ass of when I saw that poll. Manu isn't even in the same league as Dirk. He couldn't do with that Mavericks team.
No, because I have the same amount of rings as you do
and Dirk > Manu
You right clicked saved some pictures off of 4chan. Great job![]()
Did Ben jarvus ot otron make an appearance?
You pull the "1 ring got" card after Manu bailed you guys out. I'd agree to call it even with you dorks.
On the court Rondo is improving if his shooting didnt suck I would say he is a better defender/rebounder hence better PG than CP3 ...but his shot is flaky
In a scrap? Id take Rajon ...its all about "reach" baby!!
I too prefer Dwill because of the size shooting and he would work well in a traingle, CP# needs the ballin his hands Dwill can play off the ball ...and befor eyou morons agrgue how do I know that ...Iw atched him do it in college some with dee Brown ...
CP# and Rondo are both top PG's ...CP# gets better stats cuz he is asked do so much and delivers (mostly) Rondo gets assists Passing to KG, Pierce and Allen so they both have points ...
Why are people so emotional about the players? That's fine for 12 years old, but it becomes creepy if you're older than that.
I don't know if Paul is the better PG in the league - if I had to pick a PG to build a team around, I'd pick Deron Williams everyday and twice on Sunday. Paul dominates the ball a little too much for my taste and it's more of a defensive liability. He'd be my 2nd choice. After those 2, Parker is 3rd on a tier of his own. Then comes the rest of the bunch - Billups, Nash, Rondo and Rose (who has potential to be as good as the top 2) - the order depends pretty much on what kind of PG you need.
How does Rondo being a better rebounder make him a better PG than CP3?
Pau is a better floor general, scorer, ball handler, passer, shooter. Both are good at creating turnovers. The only real advantage Rondo has over Paul is his size and crazy length. Which makes him a better team defender.
Could care less about my PGs rebounding.
Great post (minus the cursing) I agree just like folks CP# would not be a great fit in LA ...now I would change my offense if I HAD CP3 BUT truth is out of the top PG's I could see DWIll as the best fit and I personally dont believe He or TP for that matter are WAYYY behind CPR like the Hornets fans and media does ...
I agree that Rebounding is not the top attribute for a PG but defense is and rebounding can be key how do you think Kidd and Magic start so many breaks getting the rebounfd themselves and pushing ...in fact I think Cp3's rebounding for his size is amazing ...
Who said that? And it's not like Rondo is such a better rebounder than Paul, they're very close.
Does anybody have any real reason why Williams is better than Paul? HERP PAUL HAS THE BALL IN HIS HANDS TOO MUCH DERP isn't a good reason.
I got Deron and Paul as 1a and 1b, really doesnt matter who you want to consider the best cause theyre so close either way...I will say this--Deron kills Paul head-to-head, is a bigger offensive threat in that when he's on he's basically unstoppable even moreso than Paul, and a better man-to-man defender (he has been able to shut down Paul in the past, Paul has never done that to him).
I dont see anything wrong with people considering Deron the best PG, quit being a homer and acting like Paul is far and away the best. Deron is right there with him and a legit argument can be made for both of them.
The perception that he always wins their head-to-head matchups. That, and the idea that D Will would never allow Chauncey Billups to own him in the playoffs like CP3 did.
lmao! No I didn't!![]()
Dumbass!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmI4r1XviVI
BTW, EACH AND EVERY PAUL BASHER IN HERE! YOU ARE ALL A BUNCH OF BAGS!
ESPECIALLY SPURS FANS! STUPID ING S!
Why not? It's something that impacts the game. It's mostly a stylistic thing - Isiah Thomas played the same way and he was very good, and Paul is equally good - but I think it limits your options on approaching the game. Plus, the team gets used to play in a certain way - reacting to the PG, instead of reacting to the ball movement or to the defence - and that often leads to stagnancy when the PG is out of the game. Williams offers more versatility, from my perspective - little things, like better small on big screening, better play off-the-ball, he can be used in a 2guard front - and his size makes him a superior and more versatile defender (for example, remember yesterday when Paul was on Ray Allen and got immediately posted? It wouldn't happen with Williams). Anyway, it's more of a stylistic preference to me, I can't really tell one is better than the other, they're just different. If I had a team of spot-up shooters and bigs who are mostly finishers at the rim, I'd pick Paul ahead. But that wouldn't be my kind of roster...
Rondo felt emboldened, eager to engage Paul. The procession of trash talk, sources said, pushed into the personal when Rondo was heard to tell Paul, “I’ve got a ring, and you’re never gonna win one.”
As they traded technical fouls at the Boston Garden, as emotions escalated, sources said Rondo declared that Paul wished he could be him, suggesting that his frustration dripped with envy. On the way to the locker room, Hornets coach Byron Scott heard Paul insist that Rondo “is gonna respect me as a man,” and soon Paul started on his way down the corridor to tell the Celtics point guard himself.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slu...yhoo&type=lgns
1 Ring got!!!!
Sounds like a future Jason Kidd...
BRHornet, do you treat your women like that too?![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)