Ok, where is my thesis that the current record isn't pure luck? I never once brought up "luck".
Can you quote me on that?
You won 65 last season and 58 or so in the season before where you were a bellow .600 team before Pau, so it's very close.
I said the record was due to luck and you answered, and I quote, you "nonsense".Ok, where is my thesis that the current record isn't pure luck? I never once brought up "luck".
Can you quote me on that?
Aren't you taking your passion for Kobe too far? No need to replicate his ways of not being responsible for his own actions.
Nope. You're making up yet again. I never said luck was nonsense. I was responding to you being a .
PLEASE, stop making stuff up like Katie.
Look at my response:
YOU "Learn something while I'm here."
ME "Nonsense."
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...1&postcount=39
Good for you.
I already learned your quote is contradicted by the listed citation. I mean really do you want me to actually to PWN you ever more?
No, much like Kate Faber I don't suffer from schizophrenia. Now is English your second language?
Here you go,"lol So not denying something is now an admission of guilt?" What is your excuse now?
You weren't the quickest guy in school where you?
From the fact that not everyone who com mitts suicide isn't mentally ill. And so where are you getting that is does again?
I'm not the one quoting Wikipedia and some obscure opinion piece.
You're now trying to say you were actually agreeing with me and that my point was correct?
All this because you're too much of a chicken to take on a sig bet (a recurrent phenomenon in your history here, it seems)?
Stupid. Don't make up my imaginary agreements with you.
I whole-heartedly disagree with this as an absolute rule:
"What differentiates good teams is their ability to have blow-out games."
Are you saying that the most important factor to decide close games is the quality of the team and not luck? Simple yes or no question.
The only reason I posted in the first place is b/c you don't know what you are talking about. So please save it.
I don't know about OJ I admit it.
I do know about Kobe. Thanks and try again.
When are you going to show it then?
Instead, what the results tend to show is that the difference between good teams and bad teams is mitigated in close games. Look at the best-fit regression line on the chart. The slope is nowhere near 1, and the difference between the expected record in close games for the very best teams (about .600) and the very worst teams (about .400) is much smaller than the difference between them in games that are not decided down the stretch.
http://ww.basketballprospectus.com/a...?articleid=573
Seriously, Allanon, just accept the bet and back down from your comments on the rape of mentally ill girls in order to save some resemblance of respectability.
I sure love yo mamma's pussy.
You are suffering from delusions, like Katie. Never once have you listed contradicting citations.I already learned your quote is contradicted by the listed citation. I mean really do you want me to actually to PWN you ever more?
No much like Kate Farber, English isn't my second language.No, much like Kate Faber I don't suffer from schizophrenia. Now is English your second language?
Thankyou.Here you go,"lol So not denying something is now an admission of guilt?" What is your excuse now?
Not denying or testifying means there is no case. Kobe is innocent under cons utional law.
You should ask your mom; I think she'd disagree.You weren't the quickest guy in school where you?
Where is this "fact" you speak of? Are you a psychiatrist? Making this up or do you actually have some proof this time?From the fact that not everyone who com mitts suicide isn't mentally ill. And so where are you getting that is does again?
You're right, you're not quoting anything but yourself. Thanks for your OPINION. I disagree with your OPINION. Thanks for playing.I'm not the one quoting Wikipedia and some obscure opinion piece.
Just waiting on you big boy.
And how does this prove your point or contradict anything I've said?
Instead, what the results tend to show is that the difference between good teams and bad teams is mitigated in close games. Look at the best-fit regression line on the chart. The slope is nowhere near 1, and the difference between the expected record in close games for the very best teams (about .600) and the very worst teams (about .400) is much smaller than the difference between them in games that are not decided down the stretch.
http://ww.basketballprospectus.com/a...?articleid=573
Seriously, mogrovejo, please come up with a bet that contradicts anything I've said and not that you've "imagined" up like mentally ill people do.Seriously, Allanon, just accept the bet and back down from your comments on the rape of mentally ill girls in order to save some resemblance of respectability.
I always say when you win in this league people tend to overaggegerate the greatness of a player. When the lakers won the 3 peat it was Shaq is the best bigman in the league and when the spurs won their les it was Duncan is the best player in the league. Chuck use to always be on Duncan's when the spurs were winning and was anti Kobe for many years up until the Gasol trade. Personally I think Lebron is by far a better player then Kobe considering he has managed to win at a high percentage with mediocre talent something Kobe couldn't do which was evident from '04-'07 that his teams were pure garbage. I know some people will spin the lakers current 5-1 record but they have won against 5 ty creampuff teams. Whenever Lebron wins that first le whether its with the Cavs or someother team you will see the same guys who are on Kobe's jump on to Lebrons .
Jesus, can't you realize that if the winning record in close games between the very best and worst teams in the league is 60-40 at most, than the difference in the standings is mostly due to blow-out games?
, this is basics arithmetics. No wonder you believe Kobe was in his right to rape a girl just because she was mentally ill.
Who knows any more what exactly cons utes what you said? You just keep saying A and then denying you ever said A.
Btw, your blatant lack of respect for mentally ill people is rather disturbing. Is that Freudian?
The Lakers are 3-3 in close games this year. Is this simple arithmetic as well?
How does it apply to your fancy graphs?
Prove it. The thread is here. Where have I said A and then denied saying A?Who knows any more what exactly cons utes what you said? You just keep saying A and then denying you ever said A.
Find a SPECIFIC example or stop bull- ting me.
Never once have I been casual of a mentally ill person without being insulted, provoked into or prodded for it. If you mention it, I will include it.Btw, your blatant lack of respect for mentally ill people is rather disturbing. Is that Freudian?
If you're an asshole to me, I'll be an asshole right back. If you're not an asshole, I'm polite.
You must have started off being an asshole, that's why we're still having this conversation.
Have a look for yourself through this entire thread.
Your organization does have a great history of stealing players Shaq,Jabbar, or making bs collusions trades so I wouldn't hold it past them. However I think when Lebron hits his prime and has the pieces around him the Lakers will be in rebuilding mode so pretty much they will be irrelevant at that point of time.
Can Kobe become player of two decades? NO
Can Kobe become rapist of two decades? YES all he needs to do is find him another white girl to take advantage of, or really a girl of any color
Tim and Shaq are the two best players of the decade. Don't give me that Kobe . All you ers believe the hype the last couple of years ESPN are feeding you. Kobe's been the best player in the league for maybe 2 seasons max.
Kobe 4-1 against Duncan LOL
Kobe had the other player of the decade besides Tim on his team to help him get that 4-1 advantage.
Take away Shaq and it's 1-4 against Duncan, better yet put Shaq on the Spurs with TD and it's 0-4.
How can you say it's Kobe 4-1 when he had Shaq for three of those as the centerpiece of that team. Kobe at best was the third best player of the decade who played with arguably the second best or best player of the decade in Shaq for 3 of those les.
You Kobe suckers are ing re s.
This OP was a complete waste of time.
Yeah...how ignorant to think a team that went to the finals 2 years ago, won last year, is favored to win this year could win 3 more les when the core is signed for 5-6 years.
You argue basketball points.... then when you cant take the heat you pull of all things the 5 year old rape card as if that has anything to with basketball. And on top of it all you say... learn from me?
Learn what? How to a bafoon?
8 pages LOL. Successful troll is successful.
When I see a guy trying so hard to seek validation I can't help, but think he didn't have a strong male role model in his life. When did your father run out on you guys?
I didn't have to list it b/c your source did it for me. Care to try again?
Oh that is kind of sad then.
Do they not teach reading comprehension in school anymore? You didn't answer what I asked you at all.
I just did, and it was as I suspected. She pity f#@ked you b/c her kind soul thinks that even the "special" kids like yourself deserve some degree of happiness.
You must have missed the day they talked about absolutes and true/false, but I digress. Janet Adkins would be the proof you are looking for.
Present something other than hearsay and maybe I will actually have to quote something. As it is your arguments are about as strong as Kobe's fidelity.
Stand raped a kid in 1990. He's a rapist now since I accused him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
