Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    42,293
    he's averaging 9 3-point attempts per game.. most 3PA per game in NBA history so far..

  2. #2
    Banned
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    7,194
    When Ariza hears about it, the is going to hit a Houston oscillator.

  3. #3
    Double facepalm...
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Post Count
    2,842
    When Jim O'Brien is your coach, you are expected to shoot 3's...

    If you shoot 33% or better from 3pt range, the theory goes, you shoot just as well as if you shot 50% from 2pt range...

    Jim has always been a firm believer in this statistical 'anomaly'.

  4. #4
    Veteran 23LeBronJames23's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Post Count
    1,453
    How much of those does he actually make?

  5. #5
    Dragon style JamStone's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Post Count
    22,198
    36% this year (42-117) down from 40% the previous two seasons

  6. #6
    Double facepalm...
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Post Count
    2,842
    He is at .359 3p%

  7. #7
    33-49 Xylus's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Post Count
    7,242
    .359 is not a good enough clip to warrant nine 3-pointers a game. I like Granger and all, but damn.

  8. #8
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    21,565
    .359 is not a good enough clip to warrant nine 3-pointers a game. I like Granger and all, but damn.
    Agreed. That warrants around 5 attempts.

  9. #9
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    21,565
    Hmm, let's do the math. Let's say you shoot 12-24 from 2-pt range: 24 points. Let's say you shoot 8-24 from 3-pt range: 24 points.

    Let's try another figure: 8-16 from 2-pt ranger: 16 points. 5 for 16 from 3-pt range: 15 points.

    14-27 from 2-pt range: 28 points. 9-27 from 3-pt range: 27 points.

    It seems to be negligible, and I wonder if the benefit is erased by undisciplined shots that lead to long rebounds and transition opportunities for the other team.

  10. #10
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    153,473
    Hmm, let's do the math. Let's say you shoot 12-24 from 2-pt range: 24 points. Let's say you shoot 8-24 from 3-pt range: 24 points.

    Let's try another figure: 8-16 from 2-pt ranger: 16 points. 5 for 16 from 3-pt range: 15 points.

    14-27 from 2-pt range: 28 points. 9-27 from 3-pt range: 27 points.

    It seems to be negligible, and I wonder if the benefit is erased by undisciplined shots that lead to long rebounds and transition opportunities for the other team.
    It's about range though. Most players increase their shooting percentage drastically by merely moving in a few feets closer to the basket. Say, 20 ft jumpshot vs 16 ft jumpshot.
    There's also the fact that layups and points in the paint in general have a percentage that's normally over 50%. That's why eventually, everybody tries to dominate the paint both on offense and defense.

  11. #11
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    153,473
    Jim has always been a firm believer in this statistical 'anomaly'.
    What's a statistical anomaly is that Jim still has a job...

  12. #12
    Double facepalm...
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Post Count
    2,842
    Say what you will, but the math works.

    And he does generally take under-talented teams and get them to over-achieve more often than not, Philadelphia not withstanding (couldn't make chicken salad out of that chicken crap).

  13. #13
    hold mah dick! duhoh's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    1,870
    When Ariza hears about it, the is going to hit a Houston oscillator.

  14. #14
    Believe.
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    361
    Hmm, let's do the math. Let's say you shoot 12-24 from 2-pt range: 24 points. Let's say you shoot 8-24 from 3-pt range: 24 points.

    Let's try another figure: 8-16 from 2-pt ranger: 16 points. 5 for 16 from 3-pt range: 15 points.

    14-27 from 2-pt range: 28 points. 9-27 from 3-pt range: 27 points.

    It seems to be negligible, and I wonder if the benefit is erased by undisciplined shots that lead to long rebounds and transition opportunities for the other team.
    There is this and then there is also fouls.

    You don't rack up points on the foul line jacking up 3's. Unless you get fouled twice by Vince Carter in the same game from behind the arc.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •