Reply With Quote
Pot, meet Kettle
what a bunch of pussies. crying to mommy
Duncan hopes refs don't punish Spurs for Crawford
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2842019
Notebook: Stern denies Spurs' protest of Fisher's shot
They were also down 6 points with 1 min remaining before overtime at the end of regulation and ended up forcing it into overtime..............
Pot, meet Kettle
what a bunch of pussies. crying to mommy
Duncan hopes refs don't punish Spurs for Crawford
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2842019
Notebook: Stern denies Spurs' protest of Fisher's shot
Speaking of porn, would it kill them to stop having scenes begin with the girl alone against a wall dancing. 100 percent of them are either too high or too ashamed to do anything sexy, so they all look like those girls in ‘Taken’ forced to dance during their auction.
The other thing porn needs to stop doing is cutting to the guy during the money shot. I time my big finish around that, and all I want to see is the imaginary bullseye on the girls tongue, not some sweaty bisexual ape grunting. If I wanted to see some guy come, I would be watching gay porn, not ‘ATM Schoolgirl s: POV’. I don’t even wanna see his blurry reflection in the KY smeared on her s, and I wanna hunt down and execute the people who do a 30 second cut to the guy so he can mumble some dialogue. Because now, through no fault or desire of my own, now I’m jacking off to a naked guy with a hard on, and half way through what should have been my triumphant finale I’m in panic mode, looking around the room for anything else to focus on, which is why I’ve jacked off to ESPN on more than one occasion, and why now I get an erection every time football comes on.
Don't talk to us in our own forum. Bow down and dust my shoes off got.
This is what being an MFFL is all about.
MFFL!!!
sons even though I am outspoken about cheating in the NBA, the Mavs just flat out blew this game.
sons what is it with people from the Dallas area? why are their sports fans such made, choking vagina's?
lmao
the only time you ever post in the nba forum is about mffl's.
Everyone knows what they're complaining about, right? What's with all the soreness over the loss? The complaint is about misuse of review and poor judgment calls. No one is saying the outcome would have been any different. The officials last night consistently had their thumbs up their asses and need to be held accountable.
This.
It's like trying to talk common sense with Palin supporters. It's a losing battle.
Ladies and Gentleman...Mavsowner, "Mark Cuban"
Started as a smart ass comment that I know that no one heard. How do I know, because there was a reporter right there next to me, as well as other people who saw the whole thing and didnt hear a word of it. - Mark Cuban on insulting K-Mart
Thanks, maybe we'll take it easy for you these playoffs, considering you get there.
make sure you win 4 games in the finals next time, if you ever make it back.
wake me up when Pop/RC/Holt file a complaing to the NBA
God your pussy is really damn sore. We most of kicked your ass a little to hard in the 09 playoffs.
But sure keep talking about the 06 playoffs.
Bwhahaha Cuban wants the Rockets to replay the final 1:01 minutes of the ballgame. Get Real Mark hahaha.
http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nb...tory?id=4759922
DALLAS -- The Dallas Mavericks' appeal of their overtime loss Friday to the Houston Rockets argues that center Erick Dampier was inappropriately assessed a second technical foul.
The referees -- Ken Mauer, Brian Forte and John Goble -- called the technical on Dampier during an eight-minute review of a flagrant foul assessed to Houston's Aaron Brooks. The play occurred with 1:01 remaining in overtime and the Rockets leading by six points.
"What the rule says is, when you review it, the reason it's reviewable is because you want to see if anybody else is involved and make sure that the appropriate penalties are assessed," said Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, who filed the appeal paperwork with the league office Sunday. "So you look at the review, and just like a Flagrant 2 can be downgraded to a personal foul or can be downgraded to no foul, when you look at that video, you should assess the appropriate penalty, which in this case is none.
"Because there's no question that not only was that not an elbow above the neck, not only was that not an elbow with an intention to harm, there wasn't even an elbow. There wasn't even an elbow. There wasn't even an elbow thrown. By any reasonable standard, that change should have been made, and I'm sure the refs didn't know you could make that change, so that's a misapplication of the rules."
Cuban originally said that he planned to include at least two other calls in the appeal, but the Mavericks opted to focus on one call.
The NBA has five days to rule on the appeal. Cuban is requesting that the game be resumed in Dallas with 1:01 remaining and Dampier at the free throw line to shoot two free throws. In that case, the Mavs would have possession of the ball after the free throws.
Yes, Mavsfans owner really is that re ed. LOLLadies and Gentleman...Mavsowner, "Mark Cuban"
Started as a smart ass comment that I know that no one heard. How do I know, because there was a reporter right there next to me, as well as other people who saw the whole thing and didnt hear a word of it. - Mark Cuban on insulting K-Mart
Bwhahaha Cuban wants the Rockets to replay the final 1:01 minutes of the ballgame. Get Real Mark hahaha.
http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nb...tory?id=4759922
DALLAS -- The Dallas Mavericks' appeal of their overtime loss Friday to the Houston Rockets argues that center Erick Dampier was inappropriately assessed a second technical foul.
The referees -- Ken Mauer, Brian Forte and John Goble -- called the technical on Dampier during an eight-minute review of a flagrant foul assessed to Houston's Aaron Brooks. The play occurred with 1:01 remaining in overtime and the Rockets leading by six points.
"What the rule says is, when you review it, the reason it's reviewable is because you want to see if anybody else is involved and make sure that the appropriate penalties are assessed," said Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, who filed the appeal paperwork with the league office Sunday. "So you look at the review, and just like a Flagrant 2 can be downgraded to a personal foul or can be downgraded to no foul, when you look at that video, you should assess the appropriate penalty, which in this case is none.
"Because there's no question that not only was that not an elbow above the neck, not only was that not an elbow with an intention to harm, there wasn't even an elbow. There wasn't even an elbow. There wasn't even an elbow thrown. By any reasonable standard, that change should have been made, and I'm sure the refs didn't know you could make that change, so that's a misapplication of the rules."
Cuban originally said that he planned to include at least two other calls in the appeal, but the Mavericks opted to focus on one call.
The NBA has five days to rule on the appeal. Cuban is requesting that the game be resumed in Dallas with 1:01 remaining and Dampier at the free throw line to shoot two free throws. In that case, the Mavs would have possession of the ball after the free throws.
I think the Landry foul should be reversed and called a flagrant 2. The Rockets should claim that exactly 1:01 seconds of the game should be nullified and thrown out.
if u really think about it Cuban shouldnt be talkin all dis mess..... u mavs just need to get in da gym and work harder at ya game............
u ever hear Kobe talk mess like dis?????????? dont think so.........
Bwhahaha Cuban wants the Rockets to replay the final 1:01 minutes of the ballgame. Get Real Mark hahaha.
http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nb...tory?id=4759922
DALLAS -- The Dallas Mavericks' appeal of their overtime loss Friday to the Houston Rockets argues that center Erick Dampier was inappropriately assessed a second technical foul.
The referees -- Ken Mauer, Brian Forte and John Goble -- called the technical on Dampier during an eight-minute review of a flagrant foul assessed to Houston's Aaron Brooks. The play occurred with 1:01 remaining in overtime and the Rockets leading by six points.
"What the rule says is, when you review it, the reason it's reviewable is because you want to see if anybody else is involved and make sure that the appropriate penalties are assessed," said Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, who filed the appeal paperwork with the league office Sunday. "So you look at the review, and just like a Flagrant 2 can be downgraded to a personal foul or can be downgraded to no foul, when you look at that video, you should assess the appropriate penalty, which in this case is none.
"Because there's no question that not only was that not an elbow above the neck, not only was that not an elbow with an intention to harm, there wasn't even an elbow. There wasn't even an elbow. There wasn't even an elbow thrown. By any reasonable standard, that change should have been made, and I'm sure the refs didn't know you could make that change, so that's a misapplication of the rules."
Cuban originally said that he planned to include at least two other calls in the appeal, but the Mavericks opted to focus on one call.
The NBA has five days to rule on the appeal. Cuban is requesting that the game be resumed in Dallas with 1:01 remaining and Dampier at the free throw line to shoot two free throws. In that case, the Mavs would have possession of the ball after the free throws.
Wow. This is dumb. He doesn't have a chance
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
