Reply With Quote
I'd do the swap again in a heartbeat. Artest ain't perfect, but he still is an upgrade over Trevor.
edited for clarity
Serious question, no trash talking. I was thinking about this one recently. If you could swap back Trevor Ariza for Ron Artest, would you do it? Rocketfan can chime in aswell, who would you rather have on your team
Both have been pretty underwhelming on their new teams. Ariza has struggled to be a go-to-guy for Houston, being forced to do more than he is capable of. Although he has shown how valuable he can be as a 3rd/4th option role player. Artest hasnt really been that defensive stopper the Lakers thought they were getting, and struggled offensively. He has given them some toughness though.
I think its a legitimate question, and im interested to hear Lakerfans response.
EDIT - I mean before the season, as in both teams went into this season the same. Lakers with Ariza, Rockets with Artest.
Last edited by mystargtr34; 02-02-2010 at 12:30 AM.
I'd do the swap again in a heartbeat. Artest ain't perfect, but he still is an upgrade over Trevor.
edited for clarity
Last edited by Def Rowe; 02-02-2010 at 12:32 AM.
Before the season, yes, I would.
More than halfway through it, no I would not. Ariza has been very underwhelming and Ron is playing well.
However, Ariza is 6 years younger, but does have a serious injury problem in the past.
No I wouldn't.
The Lakers will need Artest for LeBron, Paul Pierce, Melo in the Playoffs.
Overall, I think Artest has been a "B+" or "B" addition to the Lakers.
no, because it is clear this is a rebuilding year anyway, and makes sense. The only problem for the Lakers is Artest has lost a step or 2 on defense
I ment before yea, i edited the OP.
Swap them back, or the original swap?
No, not swap them back, I prefer Artest overall.Swap them back, or the original swap
Not knowing what I know now, I'd prefer Ariza.
I keep the trade. No different than i thought when it happened. Long term I would have kept Ariza. Short term I keep Ron. He definetly adds toughness to the Lakers. Their offensive output has been fairly similar for the Lakers. Trevor was quicker and defended the passing lanes better. Ron wears his opponent down a lot more than Trevor ever did.
I'll keep Ron.
Ron Ron >>> Ariza..Hes been beasting ever since he started doing more treatment for his feet & his headaches are almost gone from his concussion haha
Ariza is a better help defender and was the quintessential offensive triangle roleplayer. Ron still hasn't gotten the offense while Ariza picked it up almost immediately.
Ron is clearly the better man defender. Much, much stronger. Phil already plays him more minutes than he did Ariza.
Right now for this season Ron is the better player and his impact in guarding the bigger SFs is more crucial than Ariza's superior triangle execution. I'm not sure for how long it stays that way. It depends on how Ron ages.
So yeah, keep Ron.
I think both team got what they need.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
