oh oh did I go against the mob?
At least you have another Red-baiter to commune with now. You can be grateful for that.
oh oh did I go against the mob?
So how is spreading the wealth not socialism?
How using taxes to even the playing field not socialism?
just supply an answer.
that does not make it socialism any more than the concentrated powers of the US make our system capitalism. corruption does not define the ideology.
what exactly are: " the necessary consequence(s) of the principles of [socialist] philosophy" ? does capitalism not have any?
or perhaps this is capitalism's consequences. certainly this is what it has become. or call it neoliberalism if you prefer.That's a paradox. Intervention of the state, except to regulate against force or fraud, kills capitalism.
Calling massive government expansions, like the bail-out or the stimulus programs, capitalism is just bizarre. In capitalism, entrepreneurs survive and prosper accordingly to their capacity to satisfy the consumer, not due to their ability to meddle with the government. Obviously, if statists weren't always expanding the government, this wouldn't be an issue.
It's nice to know I can always depend on your moral outrage and classiness, but the whole drift of my post was to point out that mogro creates a group out of the most incongruous elements.
And for the record, if I argue against the whole board without being able to defend my points or appreciate others', I heartily encourage you to call me a clown.
If you think that's what Keynes is, then you don't know much about Keynes at all. Not surprising, really. What you speak of is called corruption, a trait that can be easily tied to any political system.
Was handing out no-bid contracts to Haliburton socialist? Is Ted Stevens a socialist?
Like most Americans, SnC takes socialism for granted.
It's a by product of the USA actually having been quasi-socialistic, and massively bureaucratic, for 75 years. We can feel it in our bones because it is there, and was there before most of us.
Conservatives in the USA for the most part do not seem so guilty minded about having already been socialists for so long, as completely unaware of it. So it all gets projected on a scapegoat instead of being claimed as personally owned.
They're the socialists, you say. But the New Deal and Great Society bureaucracies and Medicare part D still stand more or less unchallenged by the same principled American conservatives who threw themselves --and all of us ---under the wheels of the bailout in 2008.
Last edited by Winehole23; 02-04-2010 at 03:26 PM. Reason: and all of us
You do know that occasionally, the group is correct. Right?
The François Mitterrand that in 1988 reformed Healthcare to mandate payment from everyone into the system, including those with no employment but with capital gains. Imagine the horror of the wealthy having to chip into a single payor healthcare too!
Chavez and Kirchner are extreme left. Compared to them, Obama is center right.
I asked how those two instances is not socialism. Instead everyone has forgotten that there are actual defintions for words and instead want to have a history lesson. If you think bush did something socialist, then state exactly what you think it was and we should go from there. If you think things obama has stated he wants to do and actual actions barry has done is not socialist because another party had someone do a similar act, then you are missing the point (like I missed my run-on sentence class in school).
I didn't fail to specify Medicare part D.If you think bush did something socialist, then state exactly what you think it was and we should go from there.
Does TARP somehow not count?
No child left behind....
I don't think so. I think Obama is just as socialist as the GOP, maybe a little bit more.If you think things obama has stated he wants to do and actual actions barry has done is not socialist because another party had someone do a similar act, then you are missing the point
Federalization of educational standards. Yeah.
Teaching to the test. Is it doing the trick yet?
Beautifully.
Depends on the trick tho.
The poll is silly and is meant for creating divisive topics to help the dems. it's sad how the msm picked it up so quickly but will not as quickly pick up the global warming black eyes. There was a list that the dems came with that they were going to focus on to try and get back support. bring up birthers and see who would call bho a socialist. Also take out of context - glenn beck. I would just want people to discuss the actual policies politicians push and if the policies are socialist or not.
Two center left parties, at heart.
Good news?
Seldom gets posted here.
We can solve this very quickly: point an example of a socialist regime, please.
The "poll" is nothing more than propoganda....and weak at that. But, if all you have is a hammer....
NCLB and the Medicare bribe are statist policies, and extremely expensive ones.
I have no idea how can anyone say those policies aren't socialist, statist, policies. Unless using the rationale that "they aren't statist because others have followed statist policies before".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)