Page 26 of 48 FirstFirst ... 1622232425262728293036 ... LastLast
Results 626 to 650 of 1180
  1. #626
    @Kap10Jack Blackjack's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    8,262
    Michael (Chicago)


    Chad - what is best case scenario for the Bulls at the moment? I have a sinking feeling Pax and management are going to stand pat another year without making a move they've talked about for years.

    Chad Ford (1:30 PM)


    They were working with LA in an effort to recruit a third team to take on Sasha Vujacic's contract in a Kirk Hinrich deal. Portland was a possibility, but obviously they are out now. Lakers like Hinrich, but won't trade just expiring contracts for him. Not sure who else is really in the mix for Hinrich. The Bucks could be another trade partner for the Bulls. There is some interest in a deal that would send the Bucks expiring contracts for Tyrus Thomas and John Salmons.

    http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/30864
    So maybe the Spurs would have to take on Salmons, after all . . .

    Wouldn't hurt my feelings one bit, but it might be a deal-breaker for the Spurs.

  2. #627
    I'm poplovin' it! TJastal's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    7,725
    Thomas is a strong defender that can hold his own in the paint. I recently watched him guard Dwight Howard 1 vs 1 and he not only held his ground (Howard couldn't back him down at all) he forced Howard into a turnover.

    In addition, he only looked an inch shorter than Howard. So I'm guessing he has grown taller from his draft day height of 6'8"

  3. #628
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    Michael (Chicago)


    Chad - what is best case scenario for the Bulls at the moment? I have a sinking feeling Pax and management are going to stand pat another year without making a move they've talked about for years.

    Chad Ford (1:30 PM)


    They were working with LA in an effort to recruit a third team to take on Sasha Vujacic's contract in a Kirk Hinrich deal. Portland was a possibility, but obviously they are out now. Lakers like Hinrich, but won't trade just expiring contracts for him. Not sure who else is really in the mix for Hinrich. The Bucks could be another trade partner for the Bulls. There is some interest in a deal that would send the Bucks expiring contracts for Tyrus Thomas and John Salmons.

    http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/30864
    Get it done RC!

  4. #629
    @Kap10Jack Blackjack's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    8,262
    He's not a great on-ball defender, despite a good possession or two you saw against Howard. He's spectacular, at times, as a weakside defender and has great versatility out on the floor hedging, switching and disrupting a halfcourt offense, though -- Tim is, and has to be, the Spurs' resident 7-foot shotblocker everyone's been clamoring for.

    He's 6-9, at best, in the right pair of shoes, but his length (greater wingspan than Blair) and explosive athleticism are more important than an inch or so of height -- you don't block or rebound a shot with your head, as Sean likes to say.

  5. #630
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    If Spurs have trades on the table for both Thomas and Haslem, I rather see them going after Haslem.

  6. #631
    @Kap10Jack Blackjack's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    8,262
    I'd go Thomas -- more upside, more versatility and not as duplicative to 'Dyess.

  7. #632
    real fans go bald mountainballer's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    3,238
    I'd go Thomas -- more upside, more versatility and not as duplicative to 'Dyess.
    I see your point, but I also think it would be Haslem. he has written Spurs material all over him. and I think he would help more immediately. he is what Dice was five years ago and Dice from 5 years back is what the Spurs needed when they acquired the Dice from today.

  8. #633
    @Kap10Jack Blackjack's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    8,262
    I'm just not sold on Haslem being that huge of an upgrade or improving their chances all that much this year (I really don't see any of these moves discussed as being championship aspirational), so I tend to side with the youth and upside.

  9. #634
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    I would be a lot happier with Haslem if we could somehow get Wright in the deal, although that's probably unrealistic..I wouldn't really like Haslem all that much by himself, it still doesn't solve our athleticism issues up front, unless Pop has an epiphany about Ian..

  10. #635
    Believe. 5in10's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    628
    I'm just not sold on Haslem being that huge of an upgrade or improving their chances all that much this year (I really don't see any of these moves discussed as being championship aspirational), so I tend to side with the youth and upside.
    This. TT at least gives us an answer for players like odom, david west, dirk, and other mobile pfs. Something we have been lacking for far too long.

  11. #636
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    This. TT at least gives us an answer for players like odom, david west, dirk, and other mobile pfs. Something we have been lacking for far too long.
    I'm not completely sold on getting Haslem, but these are the types of players he defends too..

  12. #637
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    I'm not completely sold on getting Haslem, but these are the types of players he defends too..
    hmm...Only 29, I thought he was much older.

  13. #638
    P.E.K.K.A. mode blkroadrunners's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Post Count
    3,680
    hmm...Only 29, I thought he was much older.
    He was undrafted in 2003 (same class as Wade, Lebron, Bosh, etc.), but unlike most of the others, he stayed at Florida for all 4 years.

  14. #639
    @Kap10Jack Blackjack's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    8,262
    Haslem would be a better, more solid option for the here and now. But I suppose what you think that means for the Spurs, in the grand scheme of things, sways the thinking deciding between the two.

    I don't believe Haslem changes the outcome for this year all that much, and unless they'd rather have him than 'Dyess moving forward, I'd rather take a shot on Thomas.

  15. #640
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    I'd go Thomas -- more upside, more versatility and not as duplicative to 'Dyess.
    Exactly. We've seen the results of watching Dice chase the likes of LaMarcus Aldridge, Kenyon Martin, Jeff Green, Lamar Odom and Dirk - and the results were not favorable at all.

    Blackjack, you have it correct. The Spurs do not need more older, +30 frontline players. They need more younger, versatile players with upside - and they need to put them on the floor.

  16. #641
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    8,696
    if it involves dumping a 1st for either of these 1-year rentals (plus a QO for TT), then I'd rather the Spurs look elsewhere

  17. #642
    Realistic Spurs Fan Amuseddaysleeper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    17,732
    Would you guys rather have Haslem and Wright or Thomas and Salmons?

  18. #643
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    Again, while I'm not completely sold on getting Haslem, he DOES defend those PFs that we have trouble with..

  19. #644
    P.E.K.K.A. mode blkroadrunners's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Post Count
    3,680
    I'd go Thomas -- more upside, more versatility and not as duplicative to 'Dyess.
    Tyrus would make a whole lot more sense, IMO as well. Nothing I have against Haslem, but Haslem has a very similar game to that of McDyess (difference being Haslem is a few years younger).

    TT at least brings a different package to the Spurs regular rotation in which they need - athleticism in the frontcourt, along w/ better weak-side defense.

    Of course Haslem is more of an assurance move, in a sense of his at ude compared to Thomas.

  20. #645
    @Kap10Jack Blackjack's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    8,262
    If the Knicks trade with Houston happens, Larry Hughes will be in the package -- not Al Harrington, league sources tell Y! Sports.
    Wasn't it Harrington that was thought to be in play with Chicago prior?

  21. #646
    P.E.K.K.A. mode blkroadrunners's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Post Count
    3,680
    Would you guys rather have Haslem and Wright or Thomas and Salmons?
    Thomas and Salmons.

  22. #647
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    Would you guys rather have Haslem and Wright or Thomas and Salmons?
    It's an easy choice IMO - Thomas and Salmons.

  23. #648
    My Playlist > Yours Pistons < Spurs's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    27,176
    WojYahooNBA

    Y! sources: Spurs trying to trade Antonio McDyess as prelude to making deal for Chicago's Tyrus Thomas: http://tinyurl.com/yku4t3e

  24. #649
    @Kap10Jack Blackjack's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    8,262
    Would you guys rather have Haslem and Wright or Thomas and Salmons?
    The latter -- I prefer Thomas to Haslem (given skillset and upside) and Salmons to Wright (better insurance for RJ's play -- possibly Manu's departure), even if I do prefer Dorell to Johnny defensively.

    Thomas and Salmons still, in my view, best addresses the team's needs in the here-and-now, while maintaining an eye towards the future.

  25. #650
    @Kap10Jack Blackjack's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    8,262


    Some real news . . .

    So do they maybe think that highly of Thomas or are they conceding that this year's become more about next year and giving minutes to Tyrus would aid in that effort?

    Maybe they want Haslem and Thomas?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •