Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 69
  1. #26
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    pussyeater's just pulling our chains. He knows he's lying and that US health care is an unmitigated, gouging disaster compared to health care in intelligent, adult countries who know how to face and fix their problems.

  2. #27
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Post Count
    2,539
    Enjoy your health care rationing, suckers.

  3. #28
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    It's-a-privilege-not-a-right health care is already rationed, or 40M Americans wouldn't get their health care from ERs.

  4. #29
    9mm nkdlunch's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    11,497
    it is already rationed. Only for the rich

  5. #30
    The D.R.A. Drachen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    11,214
    Enjoy your health care rationing, suckers.
    We are currently "enjoying" it, thank you very much. I wonder if Obamacare will have rationing like our current system.

  6. #31
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    Enjoy your health care rationing, suckers.
    I'm sure all those people without health care of any kind are weeping.

  7. #32
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    This is the STUPIDEST F'ING LOGIC/ARGUMENT ever.

    Oh no! A man in Canada has to come over here to get cured!

    Whereas, if the same poor American got sick... he wouldn't even have the option to be reviewed.

    Right now, the poor person dying in America doesn't have ANY options.
    You're wrong. The American would have the same option of walking into the Mayo clinic and incurring debt to be cured.

    That is, until our government -- through Obamacare -- prohibits the medical profession from providing medical care to anyone without insurance - either private (soon to be non-existent) or government (soon to be THE single-payer in the U.S.)

  8. #33
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,407
    You're wrong. The American would have the same option of walking into the Mayo clinic and incurring debt to be cured.

    That is, until our government -- through Obamacare -- prohibits the medical profession from providing medical care to anyone without insurance - either private (soon to be non-existent) or government (soon to be THE single-payer in the U.S.)
    More made up bull .

  9. #34
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    Can you not find a similar situation where an American insurance company decided not to pay for someone's care and they died?

    This is akin to you posting an article that says something to the effect of:

    "A vancouver man had the sniffles and went to see his doctor, then was surprised to find out that he had a $20 copay for his visit."

    then commenting: "welcome to Obamacare"
    You are confusion the difference between health care with health insurance.

    The Canadian incurred debt for care. He doesn't have that option in Canada, because of nationalized medicine and their requisite rationing (death) panels, and that's why he came here. If Obamacare passes, he won't have that option here and neither will Americans.

  10. #35
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    That is, until our government -- through Obamacare -- prohibits the medical profession from providing medical care to anyone without insurance - either private (soon to be non-existent) or government (soon to be THE single-payer in the U.S.)
    Where's that on the current proposal... I must have missed it. Care to quote the relevant parts?

  11. #36
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    What Yoni doesn't get is that you could easily replace Canada with the United States in the headline and an insurance company with the govt and it would be the same scenerio. People are rejected treatment in America and somethimes they take drastic measures to save their lives. Some sell their homes to pay for life saving procedures but Yoni's ok with that. But hey, healthcare is a privilege and not a right in Yoni's world.
    Except that Insurance Companies don't have the power to withhold care - only to withhold financial coverage.

    Governments can withhold both...and DO.

  12. #37
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Except that Insurance Companies don't have the power to withhold care - only to withhold financial coverage.
    If you can't afford it, then it's invariably the same thing.

  13. #38
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    You're wrong. The American would have the same option of walking into the Mayo clinic and incurring debt to be cured.

    That is, until our government -- through Obamacare -- prohibits the medical profession from providing medical care to anyone without insurance - either private (soon to be non-existent) or government (soon to be THE single-payer in the U.S.)
    If it's not life-threatening, then Mayo has the right to decline services. Right?

    Could you point out where in a bill it will specifically prohibit such?

  14. #39
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    Where's that on the current proposal... I must have missed it. Care to quote the relevant parts?
    There are penalties for not having insurance...for employers that don't provided insurance and for individuals that don't purchase it. The penalties are intentionally structured to be less than the normal cost of both. This will create an environment that will cause employers and individuals to skip insurance in favor of paying the penalties.

    Why? Because Obamacare also forces insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions. So. Why pay premiums when you can pay penalties and then, when you get sick, start paying the premiums for the insurance companies are forced, by law, to now provide you?

    The commercial insurance industry cannot survive this model. That will leave government provided single-payer coverage with all the rationing and death panels now enjoyed by Canada, Great Britain, etc...

  15. #40
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    If you can't afford it, then it's invariably the same thing.
    You're missing the point.

    If it were the same thing, there would have been a "Mayo Clinic" for the Canadian to go to.

  16. #41
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    You're missing the point.

    If it were the same thing, there would have been a "Mayo Clinic" for the Canadian to go to.
    No, you're missing the point. If he couldn't collect $100,000+, then there would not have been a "Mayo Clinic" either.

  17. #42
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    There are penalties for not having insurance...for employers that don't provided insurance and for individuals that don't purchase it. The penalties are intentionally structured to be less than the normal cost of both. This will create an environment that will cause employers and individuals to skip insurance in favor of paying the penalties.

    Why? Because Obamacare also forces insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions. So. Why pay premiums when you can pay penalties and then, when you get sick, start paying the premiums for the insurance companies are forced, by law, to now provide you?

    The commercial insurance industry cannot survive this model. That will leave government provided single-payer coverage with all the rationing and death panels now enjoyed by Canada, Great Britain, etc...
    Right. So, in other words, it doesn't say anywhere in the bill that private insurers won't be able to treat people without health insurance, but this is just some future vision you saw in a crystal ball.

    Thanks for the clarification.

  18. #43
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    There are penalties for not having insurance...for employers that don't provided insurance and for individuals that don't purchase it. The penalties are intentionally structured to be less than the normal cost of both. This will create an environment that will cause employers and individuals to skip insurance in favor of paying the penalties.
    I don't see how that prevents doctors from providing care if patients don't have insurance... which was your claim.

    Why? Because Obamacare also forces insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions. So. Why pay premiums when you can pay penalties and then, when you get sick, start paying the premiums for the insurance companies are forced, by law, to now provide you?
    Because insurance companies can price premiums accordingly. That they have to sign you up doesn't mean that they need to charge everyone the same. They can easily give you discounted rates for being with them for x amount of time, or having been healthy for x amount of time. Rewarding customer loyalty and behavior with perks has been done throughput the insurance industry for years.

    The commercial insurance industry cannot survive this model. That will leave government provided single-payer coverage with all the rationing and death panels now enjoyed by Canada, Great Britain, etc...
    Sure it can survive that model. It will merely have to adapt their current model to a different one. The rest is just your imagination.


    And BTW, I'm still waiting for the quotes on the relevant parts of the current legislation where it prevents doctors from providing care if patients don't have insurance...

  19. #44
    i hunt fenced animals clambake's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    25,321
    why doesn't yoni link the blog to his followup?

  20. #45
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    Right. So, in other words, it doesn't say anywhere in the bill that private insurers won't be able to treat people without health insurance, but this is just some future vision you saw in a crystal ball.

    Thanks for the clarification.
    Insurers don't treat people.

  21. #46
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    No, you're missing the point. If he couldn't collect $100,000+, then there would not have been a "Mayo Clinic" either.
    Not true, he incurred the debt...the Mayo did not require him to pay up front.

  22. #47
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Yoni Lies: health care reform doesn't block any doctor from treating any patient.


    Yoni and His Girlfriend Pitbull Lie: There are no government death panels.


    For-profit health insurers block doctors by refusing, partially or completely, a doctor's preferred treatment for a health insurer's client.

    Many doctors refuse to treat Medicare/Medicaid patients because the allowed reimbursement is insufficient, in their 5-star gold-plated opinion.

  23. #48
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    Liberals usually like to site the Canadian health care system as the model.


    Until they realize Canadians don't like it.



  24. #49
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    it is already rationed. Only for the rich

    Wow. 85% of all Americans are rich!

  25. #50
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,407
    Liberals usually like to site the Canadian health care system as the model.


    Until they realize Canadians don't like it.
    Disingenuous liars pretend that the single payer system is the only other option available and also pretend that single payer is included in this current health care bill.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •