Hollinger would take Bucks over Mavs in playoff series

[Rogue]

Sure I can. Dallas doesn't have it. Lakers do. Denver, since they signed Chauncey do. Orlando doesn't, but they make up for it with Howard being a beast. Same for Cleveland and Lebron.

you think Den, Orlando, Cleveland are all better teams than another team that won their 13 past games in a row? what an arsehole's point of view, you sissy vulva licker you

[mavs>spurs2]

i just had a motha in epiphany, i finally got IT!!!!

[Findog]

Boxscore says we were not capable.

Considering the Spurs won two games at home in that series, I think we can easily assume that they were CAPABLE of winning a Game 7 at home against the Lakers. We can't state with 100% certainty that they would've done so, but they certainly were CAPABLE.

[ElNono]

Prove it. How much of "it" do you need? And when it comes to things like being a late-game manager, basketball IQ, and an alpha dog personality, there's nothing that Chauncey Billups has that Jason Kidd doesn't. Whether that means Denver or Dallas will win a le this season, that has yet to be determined.

I already listed the teams, who has it and who doesn't.
Kidd is not the alpha dog of the Mavs. You should know after getting kicked out by NO and Denver.

[Goran Dragic]

wait a minute, so if i was a part of a state championship basketball team, does that mean i have "it?"

Na, you have to watch people you've never met win an NBA championship. ElNazi knows more about basketball than Karl Malone. Karl Malone never watched his team win a ring.

[Findog]

wait a minute, so if i was a part of a state championship basketball team, does that mean i have "it?"

Even though I watch the NBA Finals every year, I don't know what "it" is.

[dirk4mvp]

Even though I watch the NBA Finals every year, I don't know what "it" is.

You have to be a fan of either of the teams participating to get "it", imho.

[ElNono]

Considering the Spurs won two games at home in that series, I think we can easily assume that they were CAPABLE of winning a Game 7 at home against the Lakers. We can't state with 100% certainty that they would've done so, but they certainly were CAPABLE.

There was no game 7. The series was 6 games. Lakers won 4 because they were the better team. We had the intangibles that season, we didn't have the personnel to foil the Lakers gameplan.

[Goran Dragic]

Even though I watch the NBA Finals every year, I don't know what "it" is.

Yeah me too, I'm not watching "it" right. My TV just doesn't have that "it" factor.

[ElNono]

you think Den, Orlando, Cleveland are all better teams than another team that won their 13 past games in a row? what an arsehole's point of view, you sissy vulva licker you

Don't get blinded by the regular season. That's number one Mavfan mistake.

[Goran Dragic]

You have to be a fan of either of the teams participating to get "it", imho.

No you have to be a fan of the winning team. Mavfan doesn't have "it" after they watched the Heat win.

[Findog]

I already listed the teams, who has it and who doesn't.

Prove it. Tell us how you determined who has "it" and who doesn't. Give us your reasoning instead of appeals to authority and stating "Such and Such is X because Such and Such is X."

Kidd is not the alpha dog of the Mavs. You should know after getting kicked out by NO and Denver

The Mavs lost to the Hornets and Nuggets because those teams were better, not because the Hornets and Nuggets had "it" and the Mavs didn't.

[ElNono]

Even though I watch the NBA Finals every year, I don't know what "it" is.

Exactly. That's why you think your team can win it all.

[mavs>spurs2]

Elnono's mom said I have "it" tbh she said i got that good good IMHO

[Goran Dragic]

Don't get blinded by the regular season. That's number one Mavfan mistake.

The force is not strong in Mavfan. The dark side blinds them with things like the regular season. Use the force, Mavfan!

[Findog]

There was no game 7. The series was 6 games. Lakers won 4 because they were the better team. We had the intangibles that season, we didn't have the personnel to foil the Lakers gameplan.

So the Spurs lost Game 5 on a miracle shot and were .04 seconds away from having a Game 7 at home, a game you say that they were not CAPABLE of winning.

Got it.

[Findog]

Exactly. That's why you think your team can win it all.

My team can certainly win a le this year. It's within the realm of possibility. But a much stronger possibility is that the Lakers or Cavs will win a championship.

[Goran Dragic]

So the Spurs lost Game 5 on a miracle shot and were .04 seconds away from having a Game 7 at home, a game you say that they were not CAPABLE of winning.

Got it.

I must admit ElNazi is willing to say a lot of re ed to keep the "Spurfan knows more" argument going.

[Rogue]

Prove it. How much of "it" do you need? And when it comes to things like being a late-game manager, basketball IQ, and an alpha dog personality, there's nothing that Chauncey Billups has that Jason Kidd doesn't. Whether that means Denver or Dallas will win a le this season, that has yet to be determined.

no one is prophetic enough to give an accurate prediction of the championship winner anyway. but still you are just trying to be a clot to credit JK this much IMHO. JK used to be miles better than the current prime version of Chauncy but I'm pretty sure Kidd has faltered a lot, age has vitiated him so badly it's now quite an onerous job to list Kidd parallel to Billups IMHO. Billups is clearly the better player between Kidd and himself and probably he's one of the handful of best PGs around the whole league.

[ElNono]

Prove it. Tell us how you determined who has "it" and who doesn't. Give us your reasoning instead of appeals to authority and stating "Such and such is X because such and such is X."

I gave you examples. I can give you more.

The Mavs lost to the Hornets and Nuggets because those teams were better, not because the Hornets and Nuggets had "it" and the Mavs didn't.

Well, no. We were discussing Kidd being the alpha male in your team. Obviously, the Hornets didn't win it all, and they certainly doesn't have the intangibles. Denver did, but the Lakers did too and they were simply the better team.

[Goran Dragic]

Well, no. We were discussing Kidd being the alpha male in your team. Obviously, the Hornets didn't win it all, and they certainly doesn't have the intangibles. Denver did, but the Lakers did too and they were simply the better team.

what is the "it" Denver had in 2009 that the Mavs didn't have in 2006?

[Findog]

no one is prophetic enough to give an accurate prediction of the championship winner anyway. but still you are just trying to be a clot to credit JK this much IMHO. JK used to be miles better than the current prime version of Chauncy but I'm pretty sure Kidd has faltered a lot, age has vitiated him so badly it's now quite an onerous job to list Kidd parallel to Billups IMHO. Billups is clearly the better player between Kidd and himself and probably he's one of the handful of best PGs around the whole league.

Billups is slightly better than Kidd, but not in the areas of game management, basketball IQ, veteran savvy and alpha dog temperament. I'd say neither player has a discernable edge in those categories.

[ElNono]

So the Spurs lost Game 5 on a miracle shot and were .04 seconds away from having a Game 7 at home, a game you say that they were not CAPABLE of winning.

Got it.

No, I didn't say that at all. But if that's how you want to interpret it, then go ahead.

[Goran Dragic]

Billups is slightly better than Kidd, but not in the areas of game management, basketball IQ, veteran savvy and alpha dog temperament. I'd say neither player has a discernable edge in those categories.

You obviously don't know what "it" is.

[ElNono]

what is the "it" Denver had in 2009 that the Mavs didn't have in 2006?

A leader.