Reply With Quote
Parker. why did he come back?????
Agree, small ball and Blair killed us in the 2nd and we never recovered
Parker. why did he come back?????
lol 26 min 10 FGAs 50% 8 assits TP is a ing ballhog !
my first post on this site was about how parker messes up the chemistry and yall dumbass said i was stupid well yall see now......
nothing has changed you're stupid
and freaking -17 +/-lol 26 min 10 FGAs 50% 8 assits TP is a ing ballhog !
so what ? my post was a response to ballhog , TP just took 10 shoots 3 less than bonner and added 8 assists. Whats your point with the +/- regarding ballhoging ?
are you a new <1000 posts member of TP haters church ? welcome
thank you you hospitable french, parker's guardian angelso what ? my post was a response to ballhog , TP just took 10 shoots 3 less than bonner and added 8 assists. Whats your point with the +/- regarding ballhoging ?
are you a new <1000 posts member of TP haters church ? welcome
It's pointless arguing with a French person about Parker the same way it's impossible to argue with an Argie about Manu.
Lets break this down into an analogy.......
Who drives a Ferrarri on a offroad trail when they have a Jeep Rubicon sitting in their garage? Trade the Ferrari for a Hummer H2 and an Escalade and some dirt-bikes...
Last edited by G-Dawgg; 04-09-2010 at 11:56 PM.
For me the big liability on the Spurs right now is Blair. He is just too short and does not do a good enough job keeping his man off the block. His game has not really improved much from the beginning of the season and in fact it has gotten worse. In the end the prize catch of the second round plays too inconsistent to merit the role that he currently has with the Spurs.
Why are the posters on this site said to hate Tony Parker if they simply believe the team is better without him or can become better by trading him? The common defense for Tony is that he hs been part of the big three for three les. As far as Tony is concerned I remember him being bailed out by Speedy Claxton in 2003. I remember .4 overshadowing Tony disappearing after gaining a 2-0 advantage in 2004. I remember Manu leading the Spurs back in game 7 of the 2005 finals when Tony finished with 8 points and 3 assists. He won the 2007 finals MVP in a series that was over before it started.
I don't hate Tony but I am a team first fan. I will always put my team ahead of any player. I've said it before, unless Tony becomes the player that can dominate the paint consistantly like he has in the past he is hurting the team.
Last edited by Mikesatx; 04-10-2010 at 12:20 AM.
What a unique thread topic.
Good take...too bad everyone will crucify you for it. Tis a shame loyalty>reason overruns this board.
I'd really hope Parker will be traded to Lakers.. where he will play tremendously with Byrant for 4-5 championships
Thank you. I think it is time we discuss Tony on this board. And thank you for your other 50k posts that I am sure were as inciteful as this one.What a unique thread topic.
Seriously, this thread is full of them.
Please learn at least a tiny bit of knowledge about basketball before you post a thread or in a thread like this.
I played organized basketball so I know everything there is to know about the game. If you haven't you fail at life and shouldn't be allowed to post.
You haven't been paying attention.How would you know? You don't even know there are already Tony Parker discussions on this board.And thank you for your other 50k posts that I am sure were as inciteful as this one.
With Parker time has told Manu isn't what he can be.
Its like he holds back cos Tony needs to run things.
can we have a 200 reply minimum before people are allowed to start threads? god i dont know how you can run this site and still have your sanity with all these n00bcakes posting the same dumb over and over.
Just move past it and quit ing.
i think parker and bryant wont mesh. coz parker is a shoot first and bryant? needless to say always demands the ball. on the otherhand we will have bynum who will play alongside tim. do you really think it was parker who won us those championships? if you ask me the reason we became champions is the man named tim duncan.
look, parker got injured we started winning games. the combo of hill+manu+rj really really killed cleveland, orlando, boston and lakers. but when georgie got injured we started losing games. because
we miss george's 3 point shooting ala bruce bowen corner 3
we miss george's defensive presence(he even got long arms)
parker on the otherhand is slower cause he is not healthy this year. face it parker lovers. not healthy means..
parker is slower, if he is slower he wont penetrate like he used to. thats his only asset
parker injured is right hand, his shot will be affected thats why this past few games he did well passing and creating for his teamates cause he knows he cant shoot the ball well
parker cant shoot 3 point shot. parker just plain sucks at the 3 point spot.
so i would rather start georgie and parker bench.
for now. george is the better option.
since signing manu for 3yrs i think its time to let parker go for a young big next to tim. tim is older the big 3 that we are used to who won us championship wont happen anymore. face it parker lovers. the big 3 aint getting younger.
so trade parker while he still has value.
You want to bet?
I bet you bynum won't even last one full season..
Do you think Lakers need Parker to win championship? Do you think Byrant is not > Duncan?
Don't speak with your ing head in your ass
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
