I agree. Rose is a bigger, stronger, more athletic version of Parker, only he's played at or near the level Parker has in recent seasons for less than one full season, yet people have inexplicably already placed him above Parker. Why; because he projects to be better? Unbelievable the lack of respect Parker receives and typical of the impulsive analysis that's become increasingly prevalent in sports in recent years.
Rose is either sixth or seventh, but he's got to do something to get into the top five, even if it's something as simple as maintaining his current level of play for longer than less than one full season.

Reply With Quote


