03,05,07

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan w

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan was

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan was at

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan was at his

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan was at his physical

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan was at his physical peak in

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan was at his physical peak

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan was at his physical peak in 03, I

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan was at his physical peak in 03,

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan was at his physical peak in 03, I think

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan was at his physical peak in 03, I think he

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan was at his physical peak in 03, I think he was

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan was at his physical peak in 03, I think he was at

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan was at his physical peak in 03, I think he was at his

[Spurs7794]

I will never understand people when they say 03 was the best. They gave up every big lead they got. I think 99 was the best followed closely by 05. The 03 team would not have beaten the Pistons in 05...too mentally weak.

Also, I may be in the minority here but while Duncan was at his physical peak in 03, I think he was at his least

[Spurs7794]

Wow, that glitched out on me....can someone delete everyone of these?

[rascal]

Did you even follow the team in 1999?

[galvatron3000]

'03 would have destroyed the '05 and '04 Pistons, although the '04 Piston could have perhaps beaten them, the '03 Team was much deeper than the '05 Piston and Robinson would have creamed Ben Wallace as would Duncan would have done to Rasheed. Bowen was still at his peak and would have been on Hamilton as would Jackson would have been on Prince. Parker would have been the weak link but Claxton off the bench with Ginobili would have crushed the Pistons even when Manu was just emerging plus Parker was the weak link in '05 too. Kevin Willis, Steve Kerr, Malik Rose that '03 team wasn't a punk they just turned the ball over too much thus losing leads but that was mostly due to Parker. The Piston struggled to score as the Spurs did but the Spurs had far more scoring weapons and the match ups favored the Spurs the team that dethroned the Lakers, not the '04 Pistons.

[LoneStarState'sPride]

2005, and it's NOT close. The 2003 team was stacked, but moreso when we look at it in retrospect. That team had young, unproven guards on the wings in Manu and Tony, and a wildcard in Steven Jackson. Plus, Robinson was far past his prime. That team's chemistry wasn't near as good as '05--one only needs to look at the way they gave up so many leads late in games. People quickly forget that save for an out-of-nowhere performance from Steve Kerr, the '03 Spurs might well have been remembered for blowing a 3-1 lead against the Dirk-less Dallas Mavs in the WCF.

The '05 team, on the other hand, was a ing amoeba. Win slow and with D? Check. Win physical matchups? Check. Win playing uptempo? Check. It didn't matter how you played the '05 team, they'd beat you at your own ing game. Throw in the fact that the postseason run in '05 presented the toughest compe ion before or since (Denver, Seattle, Phoenix, and defending champ Detroit), and there's really no doubt in my mind that the '05 team was the best of the post-1999 le teams.