Reply With Quote
Actually, that's pretty much the definition of an opinion, since for the entirety of 2008-2009, Tony blew away Manu's production on a daily basis. Words are fun. You should look them up before using them.
You're right. He's an all-star PG. Shouldn't he shoot for a big salary?On the Big Contract: I'm not saying he is shooting for a huge contract, but answer me this: why wouldn't he be?
Unless you've suddenly developed some kind of strange relationship with Buford or Holt, who are you to say what's common sense about how much the Spurs organization will be willing to give Tony?He is worth more than the Spurs would likely be willing to pay him. Thats common sense.
Obviously Parker is being shopped. Just like Manu was being shopped last year. Where were you when his production was in the toilet and we were in danger of not even making the playoffs?I'm simply giving reasons as to why we we may be shopping Tony, but one thing I believe is that with Tony's name being kicked around like it is, there is no doubt that he is being shopped. Your part of the blinder crew.
"2. Are the Spurs aware that Tony will be demanding too much on his next contract?"Fact? Those were ING QUESTIONS, , how the am I stating them as fact? Your cred is because you're reading comp is 4th grade level.
Was your initial comment. This is a statement within a question, since the question is already attempting to assert it as fact that Tony will be seeking too much in his contract.
If I asked, "Is Spurstalk aware that you don't know the difference between fact and opinion?" it would be both a question and a statement, since the question hinges upon the idea that you have problems comprehending the differences between a fact and an opinion as a substantive, verifiable conclusion.
The problem with your question is it contains a fallacy with no ability to assert itself as substantive. This invalidates your question and makes the statement within it subject to criticism. If I asked Spurs_Fan_In_Exile, "Hey, how do you feel about the 400 rabid monkeys in your house?" there is a pretty good chance he would not immediately take it as a question that's answerable, because it contains an assertion with no merit (at least, that's what he thinks).
In short: Don't phrase things in an extremely poor manner, and then get flustered when people aren't in a rush to agree with what you say. Insulting me doesn't help your case, it just makes it readily apparent that what I'm saying is hitting a nerve and you can't deal with it rationally.
No, I just asked you to name a big we could get for Tony right now who would actually be worth it. I'm waiting.And yet again, you prove you cant read by misconstruing my statement on replacing Duncan, then putting some words in my mouth about the draft.
Who would be worth trading for?Read it again...it will take several players to replace tim. Tony's worth helps acquire help in the frontcourt.
Meltdown after my first response. Nicely done.I'm not going to re-read every one of my posts to your special ed ass...pick it up or shut the up.
Please show me where a TP "die-hard" posted in the thread before you. All I see is random speculation about what's going on before you come in, full guns blazing about how much TP sucks.
Who? Or are you taking the approach BP is using to the oil cleanup? "We HAVE to do something... wait... you want ideas? Don't look at me!"Tony as a player works out fine either way. But I, like many, would prefer size and a servicable point to a scoring point and the bigs we have now.
