Reply With Quote
Because the Cavs are incredibly stacked up front. As you just pointed out.
I meant they are still a fantastic team outside of Lebron. Not that last night proved it.
And how about you answer my question?
Because the Cavs are incredibly stacked up front. As you just pointed out.
Well, you were coming up with all kinds of reasons on how the Cavs were deeper and I said take out Kobe from LA and Lebron from CLE and see which team does better.
We have seen that. There is nothing left to discuss.
They are decent up front but if a player cannot beat out Big Z, he is probably not going to make an impact for the logical reasons I pointed out. You on the other hand are making terrible arguments to the contrary.Because the Cavs are stacked up front. As you just pointed out.
Just another day.
If he never gets PT, why was he destroying the Lakers a month ago in Cleveland all game?
Must have been a ghost.
Surely if last night proves he is a scrub, the game vs us proves he is an allstar.
But oh wait, that wouldnt support your argument.
You aren't doing too well at this. I never said he was incapable of having a good game. I never said he does not get minutes. I said he would not be an impact player in the playoffs and it does nothing to add him to the depth argument. I showed you the reasons why. He is behind 4 guys in the rotation.
He won't have an impact in the playoffs, like you were spewing. No more than the occasional burst that Powell gives the Lakers.
Sorry bout it.
But I am going to go ahead and stop while you're behind.
Maybe. But there's a good chance you're dramatically underestimating the Bucks.
The Bucks have been the second best team in the Eastern Conference over the past month and a half. They have won 17 of their past 23 games. They were 8-3 before Redd's return and 18-10 since he went down again. Redd's temporary return (out of sync) + Bogut's injury and additional time to regain game shape cost them a terrible month in terms of playing quality + wins.
When Bogut is healthy, the Bucks are a top-3 defensive team + top-3 rebounding team. With Salmons they now have the additional scorer/shot-creator they needed to elevate their offense to passable.
That might be true. He's still better than Powell or any other of our bench bigs. And the the other Cavs role players are still much better than our's. You can downplay that significance all you want but NBA history disagrees that they are not important.
Don't. Please tell me more about how last night proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that LA is more stacked than Cleveland. Its especially amusing me since we've lost 2 straight at full strength to teams worse than the Bucks, and needed an overtime buzzer beater to beat them this season, at full strength.
Last edited by picc84; 03-07-2010 at 03:34 PM.
Yeah, I'm sure he's better than Lamar Odom.
Nope, I already knew they were playing great ball.
LA is "clearly the most stacked team in the league", and "blows everyone else away in talent".
"I would love to see the Cavs play without Lebron" because "it would show everyone this is not 2007 and they have a great team".....that loses to the Bucks.
A truly great team would beat every non-contender. Like the Lakers do.
And the Spurs.A truly great team would beat every non-contender. Like the Lakers do.
No Bron today. It would suck if the Cavs beat the Spurs in order to prove Picc's point. That would be a double dose of STFU to me
Shhhh.No Bron today. It would suck if the Cavs beat the Spurs in order to prove Picc's point. That would be a double dose of STFU to me
Easily.
Most talent hands down.
Oh, there's no argument..he has the best supporting cast of the post-80s era off the top of my head..
Damn this was an easy le to predict.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions