Reply With Quote
Let me guess.
This is an example of you owning another poster in this thread.
The Spurs Front Office feels they don't need RMJ back. You lose.
Let me guess.
This is an example of you owning another poster in this thread.
Mel, I'll make you a deal, stop coming in here just to bash me and this thread will die. As I said, I've already won, there's no need for you to keep this thread alive. If all you want to do is troll, you're doing a fine job because you never post anything of substance.Let me guess.
This is an example of you owning another poster in this thread.
Thank you.
chazley is so dedicated to his craft. 61 posts in this thread. That is almost half of his posts on Spurstalk.
Don't hate, appreciate.
You have no appreciation for irony, do you? This thread has had dozens of chances to die, only to be resurrected by you. Each time you bump the thread you're asking for a response. If you truly wanted the thread to die, all you have to do is never post in it again. Then it will finally die the death it richly deserves.
Like I said, if you stop posting in it it will die. Your posts are useless and have no value, just leave.
I already won the argument, and no one is left to argue with me. All you want to do is bash me.
Post one example where someone had a point that I didn't have a valid response to. Just one.
You declared victory, you won nothing.
What next, are you going to bump your threads extolling the virtues of Bonner and Jeffries?
You may think that you dominated everyone here. You may be happy by thinking you crashed everyone but our aim is not crash the other users in this forum, we're trying to share our ideas.
But you couldn't do what you should do. Nobody think that you're right and also nobody even didn't confused about RMJ after reading you. So you couldn't convince anyone and you're not successful.
I will summarize your states in your 61 posts under this thread:
- We need a 3 pointer and RMJ is %37 shooter.
- RMJ is a good SG but Pop used him as PG this year.
- RMJ was good at playing SG in 2009 but couldn't do well in 2010 because playing in PG
- We can't replace him by paying LLE.
This can be explain in 1 or 2 posts but you did it 61 times by saying the same thing in different ways. Everyone is bored here and they are pissed of giving the same response to your message. Only EricB told you RMJ's %37 three point avergae doesn't mean too much, because it was %32 in play-offs at least 4 times. But you have stated %37 again and again until the other users stops to give same answer.
Last edited by tuncaboylu; 07-08-2010 at 02:22 AM.
About half that post is wrong. However, I appreciate you taking the time to read through some of the thread.
Basically, I said RMJ shot 42% and 12 points from 3 his first Spurs season, and I think that expecting 8-9 ppg and 38% from 3 is not out of the question if he goes back to his role as a SG.
Plus, when you 'summarize' my thoughts, even though somewhat inaccurately, you don't bring up any counter points. People have tried, unsuccessfully, to counter point what I have brought up to no avail, so I don't blame you for not trying to do so.
I don't mind admitting I'm wrong and changing my viewpoints, but people are trying to argue with me that we can find a better shooter for a vet minimum.
I'm saying he is a viable 8th/9th man on a championship team. Everyone expects him to be a Manu or Wade, which he will never come close to being obviously. If he can't do anything other than shoot 3's at a good rate, that alone is very valuable to a championship team.
So if we're basing this completely off shooting (defense doesn't count right?) why not go after Luther Head. He's a better shooter who could probably be had for very little money. Oh and the Spurs FO hasn't already ruled him as far as we know. That's something he has over RMJ.
His defense is atrocious, but it doesn't matter cause Finley's defense sucks too. Wonder what happened to that guy and his playing time this season.
Chazley dude, you make a bit of sense and I think re-signing him would not be such a bad thing as long as we keep him as a 2-guard and don't expect him to be a star. However, you forgot something very important:
Mason is the 'it' guy to hate right now so no one is going to have anything positive to say about him.
This is the crux of the issue. The premise is faulty as I pointed out in my first response in this thread. Any argument based on that faulty premise will be flawed. Clearly you don't recognize this as you have simply repeated the same thing over and over again and declared yourself victorious. Then you take offense when others find that approach humorous.
Ya know what just happened?
I just owned chazz.
Yeah ... that just happened.
Yea, I know, it's fun to argue with these guys who don't know what they're talking about though. They think guys who shoot 40% from 3 are available anywhere for the vet minimum and that those guys aren't valuable as 8th/9th best players on a championship team. It's so funny, people on these boards get super excited about a guy like James Jones, but completely dismiss that he, too, is terrible on defense, but don't hold that against him.
Also, Mason is not atrocious on defense. He doesn't have good lateral quickness, but he gives the effort at least. His defense is just emphasized because our team defense as a hole isn't nearly what is was back in the day.
What is faulty about it? We have no cap room, but we can resign our own players for above the vet minimum. It is not flawed, and it is the base point for my argument.
Dear troll, I will explain why your arguments are not valid: they suffer from severe selection bias. First you choose a single attribute (shooting), then you select the stat that best suits your own opinion (ignoring the most recent and relevant stat). Do you understand that by selecting very specific info and ignoring all other info you can "prove" virtually anything? Do you understand that this doesn't mean , if for example a certain player sucks and makes opponents goand fans go
? when he is on the floor?
Also if you don't want other people to think that you are a kid, don't use the words "hate" and "own" quite as often.
That being said, this thread is so stupid it is/was kind of funny.
His arrogance is only second to his stupidity. Chaz seems to think the professionals are wrong. All bow down to Sir Chaz!!!! You have declared yourself victorious!!!! Too bad no one else thinks so. But hey!!! We are all kings in our own mind my friend.
Keep it going bro., your stupidity entertains us.
That doesn't matter. Neither have the possibility of playing here next season so having any sort of discussion about how they would help is a waste of time. Game over. Congrats on your fail.
haha, love seeing everyone so bitter about me dominating some of the big posters on SpursTalk. This is fun.
The best part is people trying to say I'm wrong and stupid without having a discussion with me. Too funny.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
