Page 16 of 47 FirstFirst ... 612131415161718192026 ... LastLast
Results 376 to 400 of 1165
  1. #376
    #1 poster - @chazley
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    1,360
    PLEASE GOD, let DA be wrong about the 4th year being a player option instead of a team option...

    11 mil for a 34 year old RJ? *puke*

    It'd be alright if the Spurs ever moved expiring contracts for assets, but they rarely do.

    If only we had traded for Jared Jeffries last season...

  2. #377
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    This does not bode well for Parker. I do not like it.

  3. #378
    Defense Wins Championships Texas_Ranger's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    13,364
    At least we've got a SF now. Yes he is overpaid, and I gues he will suck in his 3rd and 4th year, but if we want to win it all we need him now. Jefferson was not that good last year, but I believe he will play much better this year. So I'm OK with RJ. The only thing that makes me angry is Bonner's contract. LOL @ raise. Pathetic.

  4. #379
    Chunky Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    30,520
    Player option... LOL

    Nice hustling job RJ!
    if only he could hustle like that during the games

  5. #380
    Veteran Chomag's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    8,772
    player option is better than no option.
    Might as well be, I highly doubt RJ would opt out of the 11 mil (highest paid year of his contract) near the end of his career.

  6. #381
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Post Count
    110
    By my calc's, the Spurs are now about $740K over the tax line if you count Anderson @ 100% of the rookie scale (he can sign from 80% to 125% of that figure) and the 4 Toros as fully guaranteed (though we know that they aren't).

    That's 14 players on the roster by the way.

  7. #382
    Veteran Chomag's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    8,772
    if only he could hustle like that during the games
    no doubt!

  8. #383
    hope and change
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    5,749
    WGAF about years 3 and 4? If he'll suck as much as some of you think, the higher the lotto pick.
    Blair/Hill/Splitter/RJ/Bonner...

    I don't see a top 10 pick

  9. #384
    Chunky Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    30,520
    This does not bode well for Parker. I do not like it.

  10. #385
    #1 poster - @chazley
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    1,360
    This does not bode well for Parker. I do not like it.
    I think it's the opposite. You really think the only players the Spurs want to have on the books past the next 2 years are two players who will be north of 33? I see this as the Spurs saying we don't want any years of rebuilding and we will try our hardest to make sure we put a le contender on the floor every season.

  11. #386
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    Props to our source for giving us the details almost three hours before the Spurs finally admitted the numbers.

  12. #387
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    By my calc's, the Spurs are now about $740K over the tax line if you count Anderson @ 100% of the rookie scale (he can sign from 80% to 125% of that figure) and the 4 Toros as fully guaranteed (though we know that they aren't).

    That's 14 players on the roster by the way.
    That's almost exactly what Hairston made last season. Time to cut his useless ass loose.

  13. #388
    Veteran Libri's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    11,209
    Player option?? It must be a typo. Let me check again...




  14. #389
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    What an awesome off-season.

    Spurs got swept in the secodn round and they come back with the same team and two rookies. Spurs have also spend about $50M for a choker and a player who failed to fit with the team.

    Please, tell me it's a nightmare and not the reality...

  15. #390
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    Nobody as to admit to . None of us have any idea what the market for Jefferson was nor how the negotiations with the Spurs went at any point.

    You can go ahead and assume based on nothing but speculation but that does not make it true.


    Calm down, beautiful..

    I doubt timvp would have made a thread like this without having a solid source, he's one of the more credible guys on the forum..I trusted him, and I was correct..

    How so? 15.2 million guaranteed + tax penalty incurred by the team vs. doing each other a favor and obtaining services back for those monies from a NBA vet. Not hustled....not even close! Not the greatest deal i will agree, but certainly not the worse (see atlanta and joe johnson).
    It's clearly some quality hustling from Jefferson and his people..

    He's going to make 40 million $ in the next 4 years, despite coming off his worst season, and clearly being on the decline..

    No other team appeared to be willing to give him anything, and for good reason..he's severely overpaid, a lot more than his actual market value, and he's going to have long-term security without earning it..

    He's getting his Frank Abagnale game on..

  16. #391
    I'm your huckleberry K-State Spur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,810
    i don't know why he is "clearly on the decline".

    i didn't see a lack of athleticism from him last year, i saw a player that was too hesitant and couldn't figure out his role with the team.

    his percentages weren't far off from what he's done throughout his career - he just was a lesser option in the offense and got less attempts. if he had signed with a bad team this offseason, there's a good chance his numbers would have gone right back to where they were.

    now, a player with his skill set will decline earlier in his 30s than later - but i don't think last year provided much evidence that his skills have decline yet.

    the bigger issue is that he was never a great fit for this team in the first place.

  17. #392
    Thanks Tim Vic Petro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    1,491
    Seriously this sucks badly.

    So we'll be a contender for the playoffs this year, but not a championship. Then we're hamstrung financially for the next few years and may or may not be able to keep our best player beyond next year.

    Ffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuucccccccccccccckkkkkkkkkkkkkk k.......................................

  18. #393
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Props to our source for giving us the details almost three hours before the Spurs finally admitted the numbers.

  19. #394
    selbstverständlich Agloco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    9,019
    So now Spurs will have 2 players that are overpaid for 4 years? Great off-season FO!

    Well, it is what it is. I guess the only thing to do now is hope for success.
    At least they'll have two that are also underpaid.........

  20. #395
    Reppin' Timmy's homeland. VI_Massive's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    960
    McDonald tweeted last year is partial guarantee.

    http://twitter.com/JMcDonald_SAEN/status/19115544517

  21. #396
    Done with the NBA
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    18,479
    Are the official terms of the contract out? If so what are they?

  22. #397
    Inthe land of audiophiles angelbelow's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    9,560
    it.. lets just be positive and hope he can contribute next year. No reason to dwell on this contract.

  23. #398
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    3,665
    By my calc's, the Spurs are now about $740K over the tax line if you count Anderson @ 100% of the rookie scale (he can sign from 80% to 125% of that figure) and the 4 Toros as fully guaranteed (though we know that they aren't).

    That's 14 players on the roster by the way.
    Either Hairston or Jerrels is toast... Maybe both - that would give the Spurs enough room for a vet-min pickup later, if they needed one...

  24. #399
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    I think it's the opposite. You really think the only players the Spurs want to have on the books past the next 2 years are two players who will be north of 33? I see this as the Spurs saying we don't want any years of rebuilding and we will try our hardest to make sure we put a le contender on the floor every season.
    It's a numbers game...Spurs are already teetering on the lux tax line for this year and will have raises for everyone on the team, including sizeable ones for Duncan, Ginobili and now Jefferson.

    You really think the Spurs are going to offer Parker a contract extension at or above his current earning rate given those future payouts?

  25. #400
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Post Count
    110
    That's almost exactly what Hairston made last season. Time to cut his useless ass loose.
    I'm actually a little low on the calc, I used the wrong tax figure for the 4 Toros

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •