Reply With Quote
Ibtl
The only way we could get Chris Paul is if we get involved in a three team trade. One would think that the other team would just try to get Paul because he is better than Parker but they would be wrong. Lets say the three teams are Spurs,Hornets and Blazers. This trade could work if we could get Tony to agree to a long-term contract and then he would go to the Blazers. The Blazers would take Parker for a guaranteed six years over Paul for two years. We of course get Paul in the trade. The Hornets get a bunch of young prospects from the Blazers and maybe something like temple from the Spurs. After two years with the Spurs Paul could then go to the Knicks to join his super team with Amare and Melo.
Blazers-Roy,Aldridge,Parker-Three very nice pieces to build around, plus they would not have to give away all of their young talent.
Spurs-Get Chris Paul for the remainder of the Duncan era.
Hornets-Get to rebuild with a bunch of nice young pieces from both the Spurs and Blazers.
Actual proposed players:
Spurs-Chris Paul 14.9mil/2yrs
Blazers-Tony Parker new contract 6/yrs,Emeka Okafor 11.4mil/4yrs,J.Wright 2.8mil/1yr
Hornets-R.Fernandez 1.2mil/1yr, N.Batum 1.1mil/1yr, M.Camby 11.7mil/2yrs, J.Pryzybilla 7.2mil/1yr, A.Miller 7.2mil/2yrs
The money works
Wish the front office was working on this trade right now but their probably still looking at the contract they gave to rj.
Who would decline this trade? What do you guys think?
Ibtl
The Tres' special (or close to).
http://es.pn/d2HRF4
the other threads weren't official? Or legit enough for you?
Dammit, jaffers!
I read 'official' and deemed it necessary to post.
If people don't want me to do and say things they shouldn't suggest that I do and say things.
No one proposed any logical trades and some thought three team trades were out of the question because the other team would just go after chris paul.
Blazers and Hornets.
The only possible "legit" Chris Paul trades do not involve the Spurs. Move this to the NBA forum, mods.
Edit: The only way NO would trade Paul is in a salary dump, so any proposed trades have to involve the Hornets getting rid of Okafor's contract and probably Posey as well.
Here's to you OP. I salute your attempt to cover up your unoriginality in starting a thread about a topic that's been beaten to death by declaring your thread as "the official" one.
Now if you'll excuse me I'm off to go start "the official" Richard Jefferson thread............
You could have.
obligatory
If you could get Parker to agree to a long term contract, why trade him?
He would not agree to a long-term contract with the spurs but for the blazers he might. The starting lineup Parker,Roy,Babbit,Aldrige,Oden and 6th man Okafor. That is a young and compe ive team for many years.
*cricketsThe official "legit chris paul trade"
This is never going to happen, so there is no "legit Chris Paul trade" i cant see the hornets trading him inside the division
He will only be on the spurs for the next two years. Their not competing for the championship anyways.
Hornets next year-collison,fernandez,batum,west,camby-bench- pryzbilla,posey, stojakovic, and some other sorry players not terribe but not great but by getthing rid of okafor will mean all their contracts will be done within the next two years. This trade allows them to get almost all the big contracts off the books and hit the FA market in two years while already having a nice pg,sg,sf, and pf if they resign west in two years the age of 32.
Does your ass have a twitter account? You certainly seem to be pulling a lot of theories from it.
Why would he not? He already said he would. If the Spurs pay him he will. Stop this nonsense.
Also, I don't see how you come up with "the money works" when Parker wans to sign an extension for max money (i.e. roughly what Paul is getting). And also Batum's value to the Blazers is A LOT higher than his $1m per year current salary. Batum will make at least $5m/y in his next contract.
lol legit
Why does Spurstalk still let new people start threads?
Paul is obviously much better then Parker, but would the Hornets take him especially knowing he's going to bolt out of there at the end of the season anyway
Paul comes to SA and Spurs are favorites to win it all
Okay maybe the money isn't perfect but they can make it work. Who cares what Batums value is they will get parker and okafor in the trade. The line up parker,roy,babbit,aldrige,oden and bench okafor,bayless,wright, and some other pieces to fill in a much better team for years to come. One or two bench players away from being serious contenders this year. Next with mle the will definitely be contenders. On top of that this is a team that will attract the old vets like miami to win a ring.
Also I didn't know that Parker said that he would sign with the spurs if we offered him one. Why would the spurs not want to get him at his lowest value possible right now? Perhaps they do not want to sign him to a long-term contract and the chris paul for two years would be the perfect way to end the duncan era. After that ghill could be the starter and we could get a trade exception from the knicks to pick up a new player. If he will take a contract then that is what I think we should do that but the spurs might not be willing to offer him this a contract. If that is the case then this trade can be a good solution to all the teams involved.
Blazers- Become extremely compe ive for years to come.
Spurs-Get to end the duncan era without offering parker a huge contract. Big trade exception after paul from the knicks for a new player of our own.
Hornets-Get rid of a longer contract in okafor which means all their contracts will be up within two years. They get some nice young players with a lot of potential and maybe some draft picks as well to rebuild.
Parker said he wanted max money, and wanted to stay with the Spurs. The Spurs said they wanted him to stay, but I guess they haven't put an offer on the table for max money yet. And I don't think paying RJ $10 million per year is going to help in negotiating a pay cut from Parker. He wants his $15 million per year or so, and will probably get them even with the new CBA. It might come with a S&T if the Spurs decide they can't pay him that much.
Please read again. It is a three team trade and hornets do not get parker.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
