Reply With Quote
Those damn Muslims are a scary religion, unlike peaceful Christianity.
Those damn Muslims are a scary religion, unlike peaceful Christianity.
This makes sense. DarrinS is afraid of terrorists, so he thinks it better to just remove their liberty to have a mosque, just in case. He's just a pussy. I understand better now."We closed the Taiba mosque today because young men were converted to religious fanatics there. A purported cultural association shamelessly exploited the freedoms of our democratic state under the rule of law to recruit for holy war behind the scenes". (that's interesting)
Well, you wouldn't have a problem with a big ol' Christian church, right?
Blackjack, eh?
I do it too for sure. I just wanted to point out the irony in BJ's post. It's so good.
Nothing can reinforce Krauthammer because his articles are always logical failures. This very sentence...
...goes to show how dumb Krauthammer is, or at least, pretends to be. I'm sure he knows that we have a democratic republic, and not a straight democracy. But he plays up the "democracy" angle instead.As for Proposition 8, is it so hard to see why people might believe that a single judge overturning the will of 7 million voters is an affront to democracy?
And given what he says in the article, one can only conclude that America is at war not with radicals or extremists but all of Islam. Only a fool would conclude this. Krauthammer is a fool.
To Darrin, he is a hero.
I mean, look at this sentence.
"arrogant elites" "undisguised contempt" "great unwashed" "serious thought" "dare oppose"... .could you fit more trite political tropes/cliches into one sentence?But because a comeuppance is due the arrogant elites whose undisguised contempt for the great unwashed prevents them from conceding a modi of serious thought to those who dare oppose them.
That's an area of relative mastery, cramming in all that horseflop.
I get it. You don't like Krauthammer. But this is beneath you.
F U (grammar) Nazi!
I personally believe it's an emotional issue, one that tends to devolve in a moral issue, or just the belief that anything having a hint of insensitivity to the victims of 9-11 or would be seen as a slap in the face to Americans at large, would be better off built elsewhere.
It's hard to reconcile -- with some -- that even a minority of a faith or religion that perpetrated such a crime could stand to gain any kind of boost or benefit from such a project. That's the crux for most I believe, even if they don't exactly have the ability or willingness to explore their thoughts. It's just and emotional and even sometimes, guttural, reaction.
You can't paint emotion with the same broad brush, as their are legitimate and illegitimate reasons for all involved, so to dismiss all that oppose as racists or Islamaphobes is -- at best -- disingenuous.
Maybe.
If you are one to claim you're a liberal and open-minded thinker but dismiss any opposing viewpoint with name-calling, race-baiting or any other fifth-grade retort, then you, sir, are a lemming.
If not ... then you're not.
I think your usage was correct. It was just cute seeing it used so often today.
So you are?
I don't like the fact that Krauthammer still has a job. He's a political hack, and makes his living because no one in the MSM calls him out on his multiple failed predictions, or his faulty logical reasoning.
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/dai...authammer.html
Go ahead, read up on the stuff he says. He's like a walking fail.
TBH, I wasn't sure. Don't really use it all that often, may have been one of those subliminal things with today's upped usage.
So you must be steamed that people can no longer pray in schools. That they have to go down the street around the corner from anyones sight in order to do their God given right to pray. Huh?
Are people saying you can't practice Islam?
I thought you wanted to talk about something else.
Don't remember the "pull your head out of your ... if you think it has anything to do with freedom of religion" speech you gave us earlier?
Hmmm. Is that a rrrrrrrreally long "yes" or a rrrrrrrreally long "no"?
I'll just wait.
Maybe you can make a complete sentence by then as well
I would have to see the court ruling prescribing those conditions before getting steamed.
You dodged my direct reply, attempting to redirect me to the very issue you waved off as a non-issue at the very beginning of this thread. Change your tune much?
It's not a freedom of religion issue.
Hence my question that you still haven't answered.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions