Reply With Quote
well, at 2:18, 249 of 301 precincts reporting. Ayotte 45,038 (38%) and Lamontagne 43,573 (37%).
I predict Palin's candidate, Ayotte, but where is the recount set at?
Cannot argue facts, just how they are portrayed.
well, at 2:18, 249 of 301 precincts reporting. Ayotte 45,038 (38%) and Lamontagne 43,573 (37%).
I predict Palin's candidate, Ayotte, but where is the recount set at?
Insurgents
Tea bagger Congresspeople, all freshman lacking any seniority, are gonna obstruct Dems and vote 100% of the time with Repug party. yawn
And they will all be corrupted and bought off with pork and corporate contributions.
Scam I read aboust last week: Congressperson starts a charity, employs his family members with high salaries, then orps contribute $Ms to the charity, all tax deductible charity contributions. Congressperson votes the way the charity contributors want him to.
Here's the difference between liberals and conservatives - conservatives are sick of the RINOs and want candidates who will stand up and fight for conservative ideas. That is why the Tea Party candidates are doing pretty good so far. Liberals, on the other hand, continue to elect the same old corrupt, career politicians over and over and over... i.e. Charlie Rangel.
And why is it that no one ever scolds the democrats for having candidates that are too liberal? Why aren't they told to field candidates who are more moderate? This country is still a center/right country, yet conservatives are always told they need to move more to the center; yet the dems have flaming liberals like Pelosi, Waxman, Kennedy, and Boxer and no one says they need to move toward the center. Why is that?
"why is it that no one ever scolds the democrats for having candidates that are too liberal"
straw man, .
VRWC has not only "scolded" but demonized anybody who is not right of center-right. Even moderate, only-half-crazy conservatives (those who masturbate occasionally) can't get any love.
If the GOP stays out of the DE race (funding) it's hard to imagine she wins..... who knows.. this is good news for the Dems keeping the Senate.
Perhaps, but don't ignore what's really fueling this bizarre occurance......anti-in bency. I don't think that sentiment is restricted to only one side of the political spectrum.
Relax everybody, no matter who wins, either party, total paralysis and corruption will govern in DC.
All this disenfranchised "citizen voting" is so quaint, so masturbatory, and so ineffective.
If the establishment GOP continues to play this dangerous game, I think they're going to regret it. These establishment republicans are the ones responsible for losing the House and Senate in 2006. They forgot how they regained power in 1994 and they contributed to the out-of-control spending. The conservative electorate doesn't want those kinds of politicians - and that's why you see people like Joe Miller and Christine O'Donnell pulling these upsets.
The GOP better wake up and smell the coffee and get behind these candidates, or they're going to experience a huge backlash and it will show in their funding.
"republicans are the ones responsible for losing the House and Senate in 2006"
a terrorist attack permitted on American soil while Repugs did nothing
two bogus and botched Repug wars
running up a huge deficit while cutting taxes on the superweathy and subsidizing corps.
With a record like that, what's not to hate?
Why aren't the Repugs running on their accomplishments 2000-2008?
Elected tea baggers won't accomplish anything in Congress, other than voting 100% of the time with Repugs and against Dems.
anti-masturbator O'DonKnowell is a Bible-thumping, Genesis literalist:
"CHRISTINE O’DONNELL: Well, creationism, in essence, is believing that the world began as the Bible in Genesis says, that God created the Earth in six days, six 24-hour periods. And there is just as much, if not more, evidence supporting that."
http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/...paign=alternet
God trash talks: "144 hours, baby. Can y'all top that?"
O'Donnell is well-nigh unelectable in Delaware.
62% voted for Obama in 2008, O'Donnell's negatives are too high and Coons will peel off a big chunk of Mike Castle supporters.
Yes, Christine O'Donnell has a tough fight ahead of her, but it's shameful for the GOP establishment to write her off without even trying to help her. Maybe the dems will be so confident of a win that they'll get complacent and stay home on election day. It's no secret that the republicans have more energy and excitement this year.
What excites you most about O'Donnell?
No masturbation or the 144-hour creation?
lol what evidence supports a six day creation other than where she got the idea to begin with?
Mocking O'Donnell's religious beliefs. Is that really all y'all got? Pitiful.
Just keep laughing libs - John Cornyn faced a firestorm and has now reversed course and said The NSRC will support O'Donnell and will give her money. Also, O'Donnell has had so much money donated since last night that her website crashed!
I realize that much of the money is probably coming from out of state, but at least she'll be able to better compete with the democrat with all this money coming in.
$42,000 ain't much for a Senate campaign.
Even if 10 tea baggers are elected, what are they going to change?
The way Karl Rove, Charles Krauthammer and Bill Kristol talk about other Republicans, for example. The GOP establishment ain't happy about this. Energizing the base is fine, until it starts electing candidates (possibly) unwilling to tow the party line.
The party needs to wake up and see what's happening. The GOP had lost its way and become not much more than Democrat Lite. The party needs to remember what Ronald Reagan said - NO pale pastels. The conservatives are exerting their will at the ballot box, and the GOP would do well to listen!
Guess you forgot the 11th commandment, or what RR said about Republicans who vote with the party only 80% of the time.
"unwilling to tow the party line."
what are the going to do? Vote for Dems' legislation? Abstain from voting?
I'm inclined to think tea-partyism amounts to little more than a rebranding of the GOP, but who knows?
A few might take it seriously. If they don't, the voters who put them in office could toss them out on their ears the next time around.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
