What about flouride?

[Parker2112]

Hey, if it's actually uncons utional, there would have already been a lawsuit regarding it. Or is the opposition too poor to pay lawyers?

good point. good subject for research

[ChumpDumper]

Then why were folks, including chump, arguing the fact?

Show me where I argued that fact.

Now.

You don't need to start flat out lying now. It's not going to make things better for you.

[RandomGuy]

Only if we throw out contrary findings and evidence. Of which there are multiple sources in this thread.

Nice brush off of the opposition though.

There is just as much, indeed much more, evidence that there is little or no harm to the levels of floride present in water.

The overall weight of evidence does not support the theory that floride levels normally found in drinking water is harmful.

If it were as obviously bad as opponents pump it up to be, then there would be more than a couple of minor papers on the possibility of certain types of bone cancer. One was an unpublished doctoral dissertation. God knows there are enough motivated people fighting floride for SOMEONE to have taken the time to do a decent scientific study.

Hardly the stuff of an iron-clad court case, is it?

[Blake]

I know the expense is justified in $. It avoids pollution, damages, illness, and extra burdens on the economy.

Great, you again justified the expense.

You can cross #3 off your list.

Maybe by page 50 you will have crossed off #2.

I know that it is not justified in sense. Cons utiona bars it, sensative populations undermine it at current levels, and the data doesnt support its actual utility.

This is complex. Maybe leave it to others.

The Cons ution does not bar it.

The data does support it.

This is not complex.

You are ignorant.

[ChumpDumper]

good point. good subject for research

Did you know the government forces us to ingest altered dairy products too?

It's a conspiracy!

There is also chlorine in the water.

It's toxic!

[Parker2112]

You already have been told, yet you still say it's Toyota.

.

any idiot would know that the NaF would have to be processed for consumption, so it couldnt possibly go from Toyota to SAWS. I never said this. I said the timing was su ious, and I still believe there could be more to this timing behind the curtain.

Thanks RG!

[Parker2112]

Did you know the government forces us to ingest altered dairy products too?

It's a conspiracy!

What does that have to do with forced medicines?

I think the conspiracy is you conspiring to twist facts in argument for self gain.

[Parker2112]

I understand...you cant distinguish between consumed products and medical treatment. Now I get it.

[RandomGuy]

Labeling something "industrial waste" does not make its presence in the human body in dilute amounts toxic, does it?

Then why were folks, including chump, arguing the fact?

You didn't answer my question.

Labeling something "industrial waste" does not make its presence in the human body in dilute amounts toxic, does it?

[ChumpDumper]

any idiot would know that the NaF would have to be processed for consumption, so it couldnt possibly go from Toyota to SAWS. I never said this.

You said it goes from Toyota to some processing plant to SAWS.

And you still say it's NaF in the SAWS water. Any idiot who actually read the thread would know that isn't the case.

I said the timing was su ious, and I still believe there could be more to this timing behind the curtain.

Su ious ignorance.

Thanks RG!

?

[Winehole23]

This is complex. Maybe leave it to others.

Good idea. You obviously can't carry the burden.

[ChumpDumper]

What does that have to do with forced medicines?

It is forced on us for health reasons. You would claim it to be uncons utional.

I think the conspiracy is you conspiring to twist facts in argument for self gain.

What am I gaining from this?

[RandomGuy]

any idiot would know that the NaF would have to be processed for consumption, so it couldnt possibly go from Toyota to SAWS. I never said this. I said the timing was su ious, and I still believe there could be more to this timing behind the curtain.

Thanks RG!

Define "more to this timing behind the curtain".

What was the chemical forumla for the chemical in that bid sheet again?

[Blake]

right to privacy encompasses the right to decide medical treatment. Study.

You are not being forced to drink SAWS water. You shouldn't even have to study to know this.

[RandomGuy]

any idiot would know that the NaF would have to be processed for consumption, so it couldnt possibly go from Toyota to SAWS. I never said this. I said the timing was su ious, and I still believe there could be more to this timing behind the curtain.

Thanks RG!

Screw, let's just spell it out.

NaF you say?

Do me a favor, and read the actual bid for what they are putting in the water.

http://www.saws.org/business_center/...cic%20Acid.pdf

Now, Parker, can you tell me what the chemical name is of floride they are actually putting in the water?

(hint: here is the wiki entry )

Further ing with your asinine and unproven assertion that SAWS' decision to floridate the water with the Toyota plant's industrial by-products, is the fact that what was actually added to the SAWS water is a by-product of fertilizer production, not automobile manufacture.

The fact that you still are harping on "NaF" proves you didn't bother reading my linked material, Parker2112, you lazy .

Since you are too lazy to read the stuff I give you, then let me give you the actual chemical forumula of Hexaflourosilicic acid.

H2SiF6

There is no sodium in that compound.

[Winehole23]

right to privacy encompasses the right to decide medical treatment. Study.

Drinking tap water isn't mandatory. If you choose to drink it, no one has infringed your privacy.

[Winehole23]

Blake, you beat me to it.

[Blake]

What am I gaining from this?

what we all strive for.....internet glory.

[Winehole23]

Dumping chumps?

[Blake]

Blake, you beat me to it.

I figure I beat at least 3 maybe 4 others to the punch.

[RandomGuy]

I figure I beat at least 3 maybe 4 others to the punch.

Yeah. Quite frankly, the links you posted earlier pretty much beat the out of the OP long before now.



Poor Parker pretty much glossed over all the links you provided him.

"Look at my youtube videos, but don't ask me to read the material you present".

Confirmation bias in action.

[RandomGuy]

what we all strive for.....internet glory.

You are hereby awarded 754,923 Internet Points for con ious science under fire.

[Parker2112]

You said it goes from Toyota to some processing plant to SAWS.

And you still say it's NaF in the SAWS water. Any idiot who actually read the thread would know that isn't the case.

Su ious ignorance.

?

Actually, 1. I never said that. Quote it. Now. Or label yourself a liar. No need to fill this thread with more [burps].

2. I actually dont claim to know about SAWS water. I didnt say SAWS uses NaF. Quote me when I said I did. I SAID ITS SU IOUS. Quote me. Now. Or label yourself a liar.

[Parker2112]

Screw, let's just spell it out.



The fact that you still are harping on "NaF" proves you didn't bother reading my linked material, Parker2112, you lazy .

Quite honestly, I dont read 9/10ths of the you post. You like to hear yourself talk, but you spit out a lot of false assumptions, intolerably simple calculations passed off as real intelligence, and wordy beating around the bush because you enjoy the process.

This doesnt mean I have to take you seriously and read your garbage, I told you your cred with me is 0, and I dont engage your 9/10ths of the bull you spew.

[Winehole23]

I dont engage your 9/10ths of the bull you spew.

Yet you demand yours be taken seriously.