What about flouride?

[Parker2112]

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

OK, so how many cancer cases have been attributed to fluoridated water?

skepticism.

ulence.

[Winehole23]

I didn't think it was possible for you to get more incoherent, but you just did.

[Parker2112]

whatever, magilla.

[LnGrrrR]

So, as I see it, Parker is mad because people dismissed the concerns without evidence. But the evidence seems to say that fluoride is of no big concern. At the levels recommended by the EPA, it seems to cause no harm. I haven't even seen any ironclad proof that it causes harm to specific populations such as the elderly or children.

Given all of the above... What exactly is Parker arguing about?

[Blake]

what page?

page 19:

right to privacy encompasses the right to decide medical treatment. Study.

You are not being forced to drink SAWS water. You shouldn't even have to study to know this.

[Blake]

if that is the case, then doing the search isnt either. to me it boils down to the age old question: "Who wants to know?"

Apparently not you.

You'd rather dance.

[Parker2112]

So, as I see it, Parker is mad because people dismissed the concerns without evidence. But the evidence seems to say that fluoride is of no big concern. At the levels recommended by the EPA, it seems to cause no harm. I haven't even seen any ironclad proof that it causes harm to specific populations such as the elderly or children.

Given all of the above... What exactly is Parker arguing about?

did you or did you not say you were voting libertarian in the next prez election? You tell me what its about newbie.

[Blake]

did you or did you not say you were voting libertarian in the next prez election? You tell me what its about newbie.

your meltdown is getting worse by the post.

[Parker2112]

your meltdown is getting worse by the post.

thats a commonly held view by libertarians, dumbass. Its on many written party platforms.

[Parker2112]

summary

[Winehole23]

thats a commonly held view by libertarians, dumbass. Its on many written party platforms.

Another lame appeal to authority. Par for the course.

[LnGrrrR]

did you or did you not say you were voting libertarian in the next prez election? You tell me what its about newbie.

What "it's" about? For one thing, I don't think the fluoridization of water, which is considered harmless by a majority of scientists who have studied it, is really as important as, say, a President claiming the right to assassinate US citizens, and then barring them from bringing a suit to court by using the state secrets privilege.

But I'm the crazy one here, I guess. I'm the "newbie".

[LnGrrrR]

summary

You can't sum it up yourself?

[LnGrrrR]

right to privacy encompasses the right to decide medical treatment. Study.

There's no "medical treatment" involved if it has no significant health effects, right?

[Parker2112]

Another lame appeal to authority. Par for the course.

Lng claimed to lean libertarian. I am just checking his "liberty card."

None of your concern.

[Parker2112]

What "it's" about? For one thing, I don't think the fluoridization of water, which is considered harmless by a majority of scientists who have studied it, is really as important as, say, a President claiming the right to assassinate US citizens, and then barring them from bringing a suit to court by using the state secrets privilege.

But I'm the crazy one here, I guess. I'm the "newbie".

Libertarians believe in reigning in big govt spending and control. This issue definitely fits the bill. I just thought since you claimed some sympathy to the cause, the fluoride issue would hit the same nerve it does with most libertarians.

[Parker2112]

What "it's" about? For one thing, I don't think the fluoridization of water, which is considered harmless by a majority of scientists who have studied it, is really as important as, say, a President claiming the right to assassinate US citizens, and then barring them from bringing a suit to court by using the state secrets privilege.

Man, the one place Boutons and I disagree: 95% of the time Faith in govt is faith misplaced. This is the type of crap govt is good for.

[Parker2112]

You can't sum it up yourself?

it pretty much touches on most everything I touched on earlier. The purpose is actually to confirm that these issues are commonly in dispute.

[Parker2112]

There's no "medical treatment" involved if it has no significant health effects, right?

tell that to the kids developing fluorosis.

[Parker2112]

WH: something that you should know. The vid in post 1 is not produced by anyone associated with infowars. It was just linked from infowars page. Now watch it, magilla.

[Blake]

summary

from Dan Stockin's website:

Our goal at The Lillie Center Inc. is to stop water fluoridation permanently -- through educating the public, research, working with the media, and most of all, by relying on God to help us end this harmful practice. If you would like to help us, any ideas, media contacts or opportunities, legal assistance, or financial contributions that you can offer are sincerely appreciated. Contributions are not tax-deductible charitable gifts, as we’re not a non-profit. We’re simply a small firm that feels led of God to participate in this work.

http://www.thelilliecenter.com/water...idation_1.html

I'm curious why he wouldn't go non-profit.

[Blake]

tell that to the kids developing fluorosis.

what kids? where?

[Parker2112]

what kids? Where?

oh . Read man! Page 1!!!!!

[Blake]

oh . Read man! Page 1!!!!!

oh ! Page 1 was almost 2 months ago!!!!!!

oh the one kid picture you posted from Jersey got fluorosis from eating too many multivitamins!!!

This patient, as a child, used to eat his Chewable multi-vitamins with fluoride, like candy.

http://www.cent4dent.com/html/treatment/fluorosis.html

oh ity you are a huge dumb .

[Parker2112]

oh ! Page 1 was almost 2 months ago!!!!!!

.

Thats what Ive been telling you bas s for days.

FFUUCCKKK!!!!!!