Reply With Quote
Ducks look bad, but at least they just got a TD
Not looking good for the Ducks early.
21-3
Mussberger called Luck best college QB since Peyton.
Ducks look bad, but at least they just got a TD
Looking like a game now.
yep, it may end up being a 107-100 score though. Pac-10 defenses are loltastic, at least these two are anyway
great playfake
This is really the first time I've watched Luck this year, his mechanics are very good. Can see why everyone has a hard-on for him.
yeah, haven't watched him much. Looks much better than He15man
?! almost 300 total yards for the Ducks already. Wow. Pair a stout defense with either of these teams and Bama would be shaking in their boots.
Problem is, in the Pac-10 teams put all their best athletes on offense(USC was the exception in the past), whereas the SEC usually puts them on D. That is the difference. Neither of these teams has a NC caliber D
Last thing i'll say before I head out, Harbaugh is a uva coach. What he's done with the Cardinal is impressive, especially considering the limitations he has when recruiting.
I fully expect to see him heading an NFL team in the next few years, and believe he'll be successful there as well. Niners maybe? lol
Jake Locker does not deserve to be in the same sentence as Andrew Luck
Yeah Jake Locker isn't even the 3rd best QB in the Pac-10. I'd take Foles, Barkley and Luck all over him.
choke
Locker is as overrated as it gets, but Luck is plenty overrated on his own. Neither one should even be put in the same tier as Ryan Mallet.
ing fixed it for you.
and lol sucking up to mono
USC lost.No AP National le. Maybe all teams can finish with 2 losses.
Sarkisian knows USC's every play..Monte and Lane are going to get run out of town lol...L Kiffin sucked in Oakland..he sucked in Tennessee..and well he's going to suck at USC..of course 4-1 is not bad..but it might get a whole lot worse.
Oregon as always starting off slow and finishing strong...
LOL SEC. Pac-10 >>>>>>> SEC
The SEC has more great athletes so they can put them on both sides of the ball. Stanford doesn't have great athletes on either side of the ball, but when your offense controls the line of scrimmage like theirs does and is a pro-style run first offense, it doesn't need athleticism.
They haven't had a legit test yet, but so far Arizona's defense looks NC caliber, top 5 in the country in yards given up per game and points given up per game, which is a shock with 7 new starters (including all of the linebackers who have been a huge surprise with how athletic they are). If they beat OSU, chances are they start off 8-0. They have the potential to run the table if the offense starts playing like the offense that was supposed to carry an inexperienced defense and the defense is as good as it looks.
People are forgetting about Arizona considering they weren't hyped up as much as Stanford and Oregon. Only thing I really knew about them is that that moron Dan Buckner transferred there
They didn't deserve hype after that Holliday Bowl abortion. Oregon deserved the hype however they didn't talk about losing Masoli nearly as much as they shoulda, but Stanford, Washington, and Oregon State all got WAY too much attention and praise.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
