Reply With Quote
What a stupid thread
scola diving?
What a stupid thread
hi lefty
Good chance the Lakers would come out of the West even without Gasol. Mitch has done a great job of rebuilding the team. The Lakers struggles for a few years were because they were rebuilding like all teams do at some point and were starting garbage like Smush Parker, Chucky Atkins and Kwame Brown. In 2008, prior to the Gasol trade the Lakers were 29-16. They had a good team that year even without Gasol and the Lakers would have an even better team now without him.
The Celtics won 24 games in 2007 with Paul Pierce, Al Jefferson, Rondo, Perkins, Delonte West etc. Sometimes the team just isn't ready to win yet for various reasons including lack of experience issues and rebuilding.
Might as well hand the Bee Show the #1 seed if Gasol went down
^...just don't wet your diapers tonite.
But the West was still wide open. The Lakers were 29-16, but they weren't in first place at that point anymore. When the trade was made, the Hornets were 32-13, the Mavs were 31-14, the Spurs were 29-16, and the Jazz were 29-18. Plus against what were considered legitimate contenders (Celtics, Spurs, Mavs, Hornets), before that Gasol trade, the Lakers were 2-6 against those teams.
It's not likely the Lakers come out of the West without Gasol in 2008. And even with the development of some of their younger guys, it's nowhere near foreseeable that the Lakers come out of the West this season without Gasol. It might be Kobe's team and I do believe Kobe is still the best player on the Lakers, but without Gasol you'd be crazy to think they'd still come out of the West.
I agree they were not good enough to come of of the West in 2008 without Gasol but this year they would have a very good chance. They wouldn't be a lock by any means but they would have a legitimate shot at it.
You leave me with no choice but to parse your words. "Very good chance" and "legitimate shot" can be very different things. Would they have a chance? Maybe. It's at least arguable. "Very good chance?" I don't agree with that at all.
if gasol goes down .....kobe will retire after this season
LMAO@ Venti...
gs didn't call him "Kome".
He slipping.
X'in' out Gasol, retiring Bryant, find a way around the Suns in the Spring and you're off the snide, sweetheart.
Getting rid of Gasol not only robs the Lakers of their #1a player, it also robs them of a huge part of their size advantage, which is the main advantage they have over the rest of the NBA..
The fact that some Laker fans even think that they would have a "very good" chance, speaks on the disrespect that Gasol still gets from their pathetic fanbase..
If the Lakers lost Pau prior to the playoffs and had a health Bynum they could still make noise, but wouldn't be a lock to get to the finals.
Bing bing. Winner.
Getting rid of Gasol not only robs the Lakers of their #1a player, it also robs them of a huge part of their size advantage, which is the main advantage they have over the rest of the NBA..
The fact that some Laker fans even think that they would have a "very good" chance, speaks on the disrespect that Gasol still gets from their pathetic fanbase..
Getting rid of Gasol not only robs the Lakers of their #1a player, it also robs them of a huge part of their size advantage, which is the main advantage they have over the rest of the NBA..
The fact that some Laker fans even think that they would have a "very good" chance, speaks on the disrespect that Gasol still gets from their pathetic fanbase..
First off, Kobe is our biggest advantage on this team. He is still the best player on the planet and would still be an advantage against every team in the league (even the Hype). Kobe lead a team that started Kwame, Cook, Odom, Luke Walton and Smush Parker to the playoffs. Matter of fact, the Lakers were one lucky rebound away from taking down the 2006 Suns - who were a powerhouse that year. Just about every player he has on this year's team is better than that bunch.
Anyway, here are all of the advantages the Lakers pose against every team in the league:
- Kobe. There is no other 2-guard in the league that is better than him. No other player is better than him. There are no "Kobe stoppers" out there that could stop him from doing whatever he wants.
- 3-headed monster front line. "No rebounds, no rings" is Riley's mantra. Well, we are 0.3 rpg from being the top rebounding team in the league. I've stated this before, you can't get out and run if you don't have the rebound (I'm talking to you Miami Hype
- Continuity. The core of this team has been together at least 3 years. There is no need to learn each others' tendencies, strengths, or weaknesses. It's a given.
- Championship experience. We've faced a game 7 in the Finals, staring at a 13 point deficit, and came out on top. That builds on the confidence we already have.
- Bench play. Barnes, Blake, Brown - and soon to be Lamar Odom - is clearly the best bench in the league. Brown has improved and Blake/Barnes have proven to have better hoops IQ than I thought. Blake is the pass first PG the bench needed. Barnes hustle, tenacious defense and rebounding ability has been nothing short of spectacular. Their play will allow us to cut down on Kobe and Fisher's minutes all year. That means they will be fresh. Quick fact: Kobe's high in mpg all year has been 37 minutes. That means we are 5-0 even when our best player misses a whole quarter of every game this year.
- Perimeter defense. The top scorers in the league are perimeter players (primarily). We have improved in that department boasting Artest, Kobe, Barnes, Blake, LO (for perimeter bigs like Bosh and _irk), and Brown. They are anchored by #2 on this list in case they get by our perimeter defenders. Now granted you will see an occasional good game from some perimeter players, but those days will be much fewer than in years past.
There are more advantages, but you get what I'm saying. It's good to see that Kobe is still our best advantage, but there are other factors we can use to our advantage to cut the nets down.
So if Gasol went down, and Bynum got the same shot attempts that he gets, I don't think the Lakers are as bad off as you think. Bynum's advantage at the center position is almost as good as Pau's average over ever PF in the league. The center position is weak. Low post defense as a whole is weak. A Bynum/LO frontline is probably better defensively than Bynum/Pau too. Bynum is the anchor that Pau isn't and LO is a very underrated defender.
The Hype will have to play balls to the wall all year while playing their big 3 big minutes to build continuity and familiarity to yield the same results. I mean, we're coasting yet we have the best record in the league. I'm yet to see a game whereas at least 3 of our starters played 40+ minutes in the same game. We haven't needed it. Even that come from behind win against the Rockets saw Kobe play only 37 minutes. This Laker team is stacked.
ty thread, by the way.
It's good to see Laker fans actually acknowledging Pau's importance. Some of you guys are saying that they wouldn't come out of the West this year without Gasol.
Well, your'e exactly right. Bryant has accomplished absolutely nothing without a dominant offensive center to protect him and open things up.
The better question is... if the Lakers lost Bryant for the rest of the year, would they come out of the West this year?
If Bynum, Gasol, and Odom are healthy...Yes, they would, because the rest of the guys on the team understand pounding it inside. How hard is it to beat people if you have three guys who are practically ten feet long?
Yet Bryant obviously doesn't understand this concept, because he eats first.
It nearly made him commit sideways, but, he let Artest eat first in Game 7. The Celtics were waiting for him on that last shot. He could not get it off on the way up, at the top, or, on the way down. He finally gave up the ghost a couple inches before ups & downs was called & begrudgingly let Artest take it. He was actually incensed that A.) he was denied that shot, and God love him, B.) Artest made it.
That he passed it there was akin to an alcoholic walking away from a shot of rye.
Kobe is a case study for the books.
you try too hard to be funny..and yet u suck with same comments over and over...stop quoting my post next time coz i already know what u r posting ability is....stfu with the sweet talk and act like a man
What a f'in post. My god. G-man...my aaa italian friend. Bringing the f'in goods. Per the usual. What a f'in post culb. What a post. Almost brought a tear to my eye
Thank you for that culb...thank you.
Bing bing more winnin.
Laker Bois with Kobe butt hairs on their lips can't come up with anything.
Bing Bing Bing the bull detector has gone off.
Dominant center as long as he has Kobe on his team. Gasol was 0 for 12 in the playoffs before he joined Kobe. 0 for ing 12. That's a winning percentage of 0%. He couldn't win a single ing game but now he is dominant. LOL. Gasol is an important player for the Lakers but he is a complimentary player who has shown he needs a better player than he is on his team to win just one playoff game, never mind a playoff series, a conference le or a championship.
Nobody wins championships without other good players.
Larry Bird never won anything without two Hall of Fame bigmen and Magic Johnson never won anything without a bigman who is the all-time leading scorer in NBA history and one of the top three players of all-time.
/end of thread
Last edited by namlook; 11-06-2010 at 04:39 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions