Reply With Quote
Assuming it was ours...
This administration doesn't know how to speak the truth.
They cannot think fast on their feet. probably caught off guard with being caught.
Maybe they were showing off range by where it landed. We don't have that data though.
You believe that, I'm sure.@ intelligence blogs.
Over at KGB.blogspot.com
Seriously these ers like Yoni are afraid of their own shadow. He's the type of person (and I"m not even kidding here) that was all over the Bush admin. No surprise we went to war at all.
In fact I bet he and the Bush admin used the same Intelligence blogs for their info.
Assuming it was ours...
This administration doesn't know how to speak the truth.
They cannot think fast on their feet. probably caught off guard with being caught.
Maybe they were showing off range by where it landed. We don't have that data though.
I wouldn't take such thoughts as fact. just because we don't know doesn't mean they don't have some modern sub now. Our intelligence is lacking since president Clinton's slashing of the CIA, and they keep secrets well. Using a former ambassador for CIA information in Nigeria should be evidence of that. Not only that, how many trillions have we lined their pockets with to research with stolen plans of ours.
I will not say they have good subs, but only a fool would think that it's not possible.
They don't call him NoBama for no good reason now...
LOL...
“Mystery missile” was probably an aircraft, government says
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lano...ment-says.html
If that video matches the incident...
It was a missile or rocket. That was no plane. If something else, it was Superman,...
Do they really think we are all that dumb?
Go Nobama...
ing laughing-stalk.
If that was a jet plane, it had something seriously wrong with it's engines.
The contrail is too big for a passenger jet liner.
Now that I've been though this thread, can I say it's a waste of time?
Just another day.
I don't buy it, either but, there are a whole bunch of people out there trying to make that narrative fit.
Jet contrails from some angles look like missile trails
I remain unconvinced.
From one angle, and wind variations, the look is possible. However, I have never seen a jet contrail that big.
Have you?
Anyone...
Ever see a jet contrail that full and wide? They get very thin as they expand.
No, but I don't live on the West Coast where the horizon is further out than if you were viewing it over land.
Given your track record of paucity when it comes to intellectual honesty, we can only assume that, since you refuse to name the "intelligence blogs", they are not, in fact "intelligence blogs".
I readily posted a couple of links to things, when I drew information from them.
It takes less than 4 seconds to highlight a URL, then click copy, and paste it into a quick post.
I think you are either being lazy or dishonest, unless you can provide me with some principled reason for NOT giving the information, so we can judge for ourselves.
Which is it?
Interesting.
The military's more explicit denials that I heard seem to be a bit more than the "we know but aren't going to tell you variety" than they seemed yesterday.
The media story has caused a bit greater interest and more people are poking around asking different military sources, and all have come up with nada in terms of even off-the-record admissions.
Given that missle launches would require no few number of people to know about them, the fact that those inquiries have come up empty leads me to lend a bit more credence to the "jet contrail" explanation, over the "US Navy did it".
Both are still far more probable than a Chinese/Russian launch.
Again, seems to be something of a non-issue to me. I would be highly concerned if it were Chinese/Russian, but there is no indication whatsoever that that was the case.
sounds like the chinese sneaked onto our country, installed a missle launch site, and launched a missle away from the US to prove their domination.
don't go outside yoni.....there might be plane! lol
hey yoni, theres a job opening on fantasy island!
are you short?
Yeah it makes sense for it to be a plane. The jet stream appears to expand as it gets closer to the horizon. Just like a sunset.
High clouds, like contrails, look thicker at sunset due to the angle of the sunlight hitting them and refraction by the atmosphere. This is highly common and makes for better sunsets. On many colder and clear days in South Texas and New Mexico the western sky will get cloudy at sunset (or basically late in the day) because of this yet you'll have a full sky of stars after sunset.
I give you the name of the submarine, the type of accident & STILL YOU PEOPLE say it did not happen… I say the jet stream over Cali never happened…Cosmic just made it up to start a thread…
http://www.maritimeconsultant.com/ma...ring91/Tug.htm
Damn, you are stupid.
What the would make anyone think it's a stalk?
Neither.
I say I read intelligence blogs that say they don't know what it was but they hope it's innocuous and that requires links?
What in that post, a summation of what the few intelligence blogs I read were saying, do you need to verify?
you, RG; when I post information that I think needs support, I'll link to the source. What you think I should do is meaningless.
It took more effort to write that post than to provide the links to KGB.blogspot.com . I guess that eliminates lazy and leaves dishonest.
Not that anyone is surprised.
No, it didn't. What I posted was my opinion of what I had read in my usual rounds of the various blogs I read regularly. I don't even recall from which I drew the consensus. Besides, I'm curious, what in my post needed to be verified? Is there something controversial about a blogger (intelligence or other) not claiming to have an answer to the event off the coast of California but, hoping it was innocuous? Or, me claiming that the few I read were, in my opinion, saying that?
If I had forwarded some of their guesses or theories, I'd see RG's point.
are you scared of shadows, too?
If you look closely, you can see Jack.
Damn, you are stupid.
What the would make anyone think it's a stalk?
Hey, pussy: They just wanted to look at the ing blogs.
No need to go full emo over such a simple request.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
