I understand statistics, I just don't see them as an end all/be all of every argument. I've shown several instances on this site where advanced stats can be flawed, and sometimes it takes a little detective work to see why, since so many things go into the formulas for advanced stats. Someone like you just see's the stats and assumes someone elses work can be held as fact in every situation. If you want to talk stats, and only stats, Amare's are better, and always have been. I already posted the win shares, where when you compare complete seasons between the two (excluding microfracture, rookie years, etc.) Amare's lowest total is better than Bosh's best.