HOLY CRAP, that kick still had alota distance left in it!
HOLY CRAP, that kick still had alota distance left in it!
Wow.
Apparently, Tannehill WASN'T that good. The Big XII was just that BAD...
NAh hes good..... at staring down his receivers!!![]()
Now we're gonna hear it from the LSU fans, DAMMIT!!!![]()
She is showing you how big jgw's is.
eh, big deal.
congrats to LSU for winning a meaningless exhibition game.
that's pretty gay tbh. if it stood for Westside Connection then maybe i could get behind it.
Still a lil pissed bout the helmet to helmet non call!!![]()
Jesus Christ almighty I was right to begin with.
Aggies are good at 2 things:
ing over UT
sucking ass on the big stage
absolutely uncannily implausibly amazing
oh yeah that would have helped. The curbstomping would have been a slightly less painful curbstomping.
Meh, dunno but A&M coulda got a 15 yrd penalty, 1st dwn, score & some momentum!
Well, yeah, and QB coulda not thrown 3 INTs; but that didn't happen, either.
If Kori would have given me the Mod Capabilities I asked for, JohnGatesRepublicanWhitley would be pinked for the entire offseason because of this .
I have many friends who are aggies, they should have won this ing game.
But they did the same.old.crap. they always do. Jeeeeeeze
Damn, you know this a new era in the College Forum when CBF ain't saying CROFL aggies and is actually mad they lost
ROFL CBF
You know UT has about 2 more years before they become revelent again right? Sad day indeed.
define relevant
Not expecting a le any time soon but as long as we beat OU next year i consider the season a success
UT gonna be in the same amount of bowl games as USC for the whole ban-time.
1) i'm not a republican
2) you misspelled my last name
3) yep, A&M could have won
...cannot believe the interceptions from tannehill, nor the roughing the kicker. but, lsu is a good team and you cannot do that and win. rough.
Well, I have to say, if there is one thing consistent and across the board with the cult of bryan, it is denial. Comes from the koolaid, I'm sure.
Saying aggy would have won that game IF/IF/IF, is like saying OSU would have beaten UT 2 years ago if Zac hadn't thrown 3 INTs for TDs, because they didn't beat us by 3 TDs.
It may be denial to say A&M would've won, but if you would've read the sentence you quoted, you would've seen A&M could've won. Equating A&M having a chance to win with denial is just stupid.
Who's "bryan"?
he does that crap all the time. anyway, of course A&M could have won, they didn't play very well. lsu was better that day, but i have to think opposite day for QBs would not be a trend going forward. how jefferson basically matches his season total for TDs, and tannehill his int total, was absurd. and why didn't we run the ball more...it was working.
oh well...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)