Reply With Quote
Translation - "Sequs the only Spurfan that agrees with Lakerfan, therefore he must be right".
F- for u!
Translation - "Sequs the only Spurfan that agrees with Lakerfan, therefore he must be right".
Duncan's 2 MVPs and 4 rings says "Goodbye!".
Do Spurs fans go to Lakers boards and talk so much crap? I saw where Los Angeles was named the rudest city in the US. Judging from your posts you probably consider that a badge of honor. I hope you guys don't get knocked out of the playoffs before you can play us. I will enjoy that series immensely.
Nothing-to-do-with-the-topic says "Hi".
Fine.
1. Hakeem
2. Duncan
3. Kobe
Just a couple of questions for Laker fans:
1. How many times has Kobe been on a team that went to the lottery? Tim duncan?
2. Who has more regular season MVPs, Kobe or Duncan?
3. Who has more NBA finals MVPs, Kobe or Duncan?
What does Kobe have to do with this thread? Geez, is he always on your mind?
Hakeem was relevant since the 94/95 repeat (something Duncan failed to do 4 times) was mentioned.
Gee, do you think Hakeem would rather have two in a row or four?
Three pointers have proved to be quite important in winning les; even for the Lakers.
This is just another ankle biting lakerfan thread. They should quit being pussies and just live with being behind in the standings for now.
poor lakerfans
they are a sorry bunch these days.
How were those Rockets before trading for Drexler the next year?
How were those Rockets before trading for Drexler the next year?
2. Duncan also has more than Hakeem.
3. Duncan also has more than Hakeem.
He was speaking to repeat. The Rockets weren't repeating without the trade for Drexler, the likes of a move the Spurs never swung the following year after winning a championship.
no he wasn't.
you might have been, but you didn't made that clear.
I'll make sure to hit multi-quote just for you when I'm going back to read over a thread, Blake.
k, do that. It would have helped to clear up what looked to be an obvious fail on your part had you done that to begin with.I'll make sure to hit multi-quote just for you when I'm going back to read over a thread, Blake.
Just curious, how do you think the Rockets were after the trade for Drexler?
What makes you think they couldn't have won a trophy again with Thorpe instead of Clyde?
What does Hakeem have to do with this thread about three-point shooting teams? Geez, is he always on your mind?
Kobe was irrelevant until 08 when the league gift-wrapped a top 3 big to him (something everybody in the history of the league have failed to do throughout league history).
I don't feel the need to prove I know what the I'm talking about with each post by leaving no stone unturned. I kind of know the players here and what they're trying to imply and/or where they're coming from by reading a given thread, topic.
Anecdotally, on the basis of watching them play, and common sense -- it's why they made a trade like that so late in the year (Feb. 14).
They didn't win a series in either le run without Home Court.
In fact, Shaq was still on the roster the last time they won any series without HCA.
You don't feel the need to prove it, but you tried any way.
k, thanks.
If I added right,Anecdotally, on the basis of watching them play, and common sense -- it's why they made a trade like that so late in the year (Feb. 14).
The Rockets record without Clyde was 30-17
The Rockets record with Clyde was 17-18.
Here's the link, correct me if I'm wrong:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...995_games.html
What common sense are you referring to that tells you that a 17-18 team will win a championship?
In case you didn't know, I think you're kinda special.
Why did they make the trade, Blake? Could they have possibly seen the type of forecast I foresaw?If I added right,
The Rockets record without Clyde was 30-17
The Rockets record with Clyde was 17-18.
Here's the link, correct me if I'm wrong:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...995_games.html
What common sense are you referring to that tells you that a 17-18 team will win a championship?
Naw, they just traded an integral part of their team, a big averaging 13 and 9, on Feb. 14 with a 30-17 record because integrating another star that late in the season would be a piece of cake. A no-brainer upgrade, something without risk and would only better their already championship-caliber team.
(Went blue for ya. Didn't want to risk you missing out on the sarcasm, now.)
Blessings bringing the hype, tbh. You'd make a real good used car salesman.
I think your communication skills are lacking.In case you didn't know, I think you're kinda special.
I didn't ask why they made the trade. The original question was 'how do you think those Rockets were after they made the trade for Drexler?'.Why did they make the trade, Blake? Could they have possibly seen the type of forecast I foresaw?
Naw, they just traded an integral part of their team, a big averaging 13 and 9, on Feb. 14 with a 30-17 record because integrating another star that late in the season would be a piece of cake. A no-brainer upgrade, something without risk and would only better their already championship-caliber team.
(Went blue for ya. Didn't want to risk you missing out on the sarcasm, now.
Are you definitely saying they were better than the previous year's championship squad?
It's not an especially difficult question to answer unless your communication skills are lacking.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
