Reply With Quote
those are OPINIONS and OBSERVATIONS you silly . They can't be proven right or wrong, only factual.
ring
wcfinals
second round
first round
The regular season is meaningless.
The Lakers and Spurs are 71-70 in the regular season
but 34-18 in the post season head to head, both in the Lakers favor.
If you cannot deduct a reasonable level of logic from that I can't help you any further.
those are OPINIONS and OBSERVATIONS you silly . They can't be proven right or wrong, only factual.
That is a pretty re ed comment. It won't matter what level Bron reaches. If the Celts are healthy and have a frontcourt advantage, they will be in the finals. The Heat aren't beating a healthy Celts team considering their front court will be quite inferior to Boston's. You aren't beating the Celts with a frontcourt of Bosh/Damp/Z/Anthony. Lebron's level won't cover that up.
One and done for the Spurs.
As for the thread, the spurs will lose in the WCF to the Lakers.
Spurs are 9th in the league averaging 20.6 three point attempts per game.
Lakers are currently tied for 12th with several teams averaging 18.5 three point attempts per game.
This is what I think: you are stupid.
2-0 contributing to HCA through the playoffs says you're an idiot.
Just a refresher
yet lost to magic(daam !!) and celts (even da choke job wouldnt be nuff).
Seriously i like da spurs but dey not playin champ basketball especially on D. In a 7 games series dis gon hurt alot. Jus sayin.
Lakers were 10th last year in FGA.
they also had 20 three point attempts in game 7 last years against the Celtics.
not really sure what you are sayin
I'm jus sayin that history2b is stupid.
I don't know how I feel about the Spurs' chances yet..if they lose to LA, it would be a disappointment IMO, because they should have the confidence and the talent to beat the Lakers in a 7-game series IMO..the Lakers' are still the favorites though..
I do find it funny when Lakers fans make certain statements about the Spurs..
"The Spurs' D sucks"..
San Antonio's D is #7 in the NBA, LA's D is #8..this is despite the fact that the Spurs' have had the 9th toughest schedule in the NBA(from an SOS standpoint), and the Lakers' schedule is #28..
As Blake alluded to, the Spurs' don't even rely on 3-point shooting that much more than the Lakers do, surprisingly..they also aren't even that far apart in shot attempts inside the paint..
Haha...
"Me no like history2b... grunt grunt. He say Spur no good than Laker. He stupid."
Whatever , I'll be here in June saying the exact same thing and you won't have a damn thing to say because like all Spurs fans, when it comes down to it, you're nothing but a frontrunning pussy who pounds his chest when your team looks good in the regular season.
pwnt every laker fan on here.
Also, it's with Duncan playing 29 mpg. Presuming he plays roughly 36 mpg in the playoffs, that right there makes the Spurs a better defensive team. At this point, I don't think he will, but if Splitter eventually finds a spot in the rotation, that too makes them better defensively and the same goes for Anderson (though to a lesser extent in his case).
I expect a championship and did before the season started (check Kori's season predictions thread if you want confirmation). Whatever you think of the team, when the team you go for is 44-8 and is eleven deep in rotation quality players, plus features many of the elements past champions have, how can you not like their chances?
There's four contenders and their have been since before the season even commenced. The Magic, Mavs and even Bulls, were never contenders. Only it's taken up until the past few weeks for many to figure this out.
From most likely to least likely to win it . . . 1. Spurs, 2. Celtics, 3. Lakers, 4. Heat.
Well being that there is no legitimate quan ative way to decipher who is #7 or #8 defensively in the league it's hardly a subject to argue on the internet.
I have no clue what site / ranking system that was cited to begin with but I know it is all flawed and none of it matters come playoff time.
SA dropped off the map last season and has improved this season but lacks both a perimeter stopper and shot blocking threats. Doesn't matter how many times they beat the Raptors and Grizzlies in the 82 game preseason. It's all about matchup in a 7 game series.
I'll take my 12 guys defensively over your 12 guys any day of the week.
so says the uninformed lakers homer.
Duncan is 7th in the league in blocks, and .08 behind Dwight Howard. So yeah, i'm pretty sure the Spurs do have a good shot blocking threat.
How is that a re ed statement? Please enlighten me? I said that you guys are teh faves of the whole NBA so chill on the name calling ...genius
In 2008 vs. your best and deepest team (3 years younger), Lebron willed a weaker and younger Cavs team to a game 7 against you guys with Posey, Pierce and Tony allen to take turns guarding Lebron ...
Lebron is BETTER than he was then and has Wade and Bosh ...again I would still bet on you guys ...but if Lebron takes it up one more level ...you telling me there is NO WAY he has a shot? I bet your boy Bill simmmons diasagrees with that sentiment.
Again, I am no Lebron fanboi ...but we better hope for the sake of the NBA Lebron never realizes his full potential ...or we are looking at MJ 2.0
I have some doubt he will get there but if he does ...
Lol, yeah Manu Ginobili the defensive stopper. Now I've heard it all on Spurstalk.SO WAIT, YOU'D RATHER HAVE STEVE BLAKE DEFENSIVELY THAN GEORGE HILL OFF THE BENCH?
OR GASOFT OVER DUNCAN? AND LOL AT DUNCAN NOT BEING A SHOT BLOCKING THREAT...
BY THE WAY DON'T DISS MANU AS A DEFENSIVE FORCE EITHER HE SHUT KOBE DOWN FOR THE MOST PART BOTH TIMES ALONG WITH HILL...AND RJ CAN TURN UP THE D WHEN HE NEEDS TO...
Again, the statement I made was that I'd take my 12 guys over your 12 guys. Only posters who can comprehend respond please.
All caps typing mutha a needs to check himself before he wrecks himself.
Lol, Duncan's pretty horrible now. Moreover protecting the rim involves more than shots blocked, it's about altered shots (which aren't recorded) and general hesitation to attack the rim (Dwight in the middle).
Gasol's not too far behind Duncan is he? Not sure but his numbers are usually close, something I don't pay much attention to because it does not tell the story of how defense is really played.
Lakers defensive presence is Andrew Bynum, not Gasol.
Uninformed, lol.
lol comparing duncan's to gasofts, this troll keeps getting owned
Isn't this elementary attempt to reduce the concept of team defense to a series of >'s and <'s next to players names cute.
Unbelievably stupid and ignorant but cute. For a 3rd grader maybe...
Your level of ignorance doesn't warrant a legitimate rebuttal. All I'll leave for you is a big
LOL Parker better than fisher defensively ...at what?
Maybe at staying in front of a quick guard but that is about it ... Id much rather have fisher fight through a screen, take charges or come up with a key steal or rebound ...
LMAO at Neal=Brown ...brown is not a lockdown guy but he is a better defender than Neal who gambles way too much ...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
