One Regular Season MVP and this Clown is the next best guy after Jordan?

[DMC]

Hi I'm either a total re or the worse troll Mouse ever made.

Shhh

Team

Franchise

Decade

[Deuce Bigalow]

it doesnt really matter what you say dude, it dosnt change the fact that the lakers had more championships, more finals, and more playoff wins in 2000-2009
its not even close

[DMC]

it doesnt really matter what you say dude, it dosnt change the fact that the lakers had more championships, more finals, and more playoff wins in 2000-2009
its not even close

Shhh

TFD

[Giuseppe]

any that plays Dungeon's and Dragons and calls himself Merlin

the tired old bag.

tee, hee.

[Daddy_Of_All_Trolls]

Thought I would throw my 2 cents worth in.

Many Lakers fans overrate Kobe, and many Kobe haters underrate him.

He was not a sidekick to Shaq during that 3 peat run, or at least it hasn't been proven with fact, only with opinion. Here's some fact to start with if anyone wishes to to try and finalize it, one way or the other.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...8&postcount=73

From that example alone, the proof is Kobe was not a sidekick. Go to work Kobe lovers and haters, settle it with fact, then we can all shut up about it.

Want to know who the biggest sidekick in NBA championship history is?

Bill Russell.


The arguiment against Kobe is Shaq was the go to guy. How many times was Bill Russell the go to guy? How about none? He was primarily a defensive anchor, and any big man could have won as many les with his stacked teams. Russell grabbed rebounds and sent an outlet pass and Cousy and Sharman ran the fast break. Havlicek and Sam Jones were no slouches either.

Here's some facts.

MJ is the greatest player in NBA history by majority opinion.
Kobe may be the best player since Jordan, again by opinion.
Duncan is probably a better player than Kobe, but it can't be proven either way, they play two different positions.
Kobe and Duncan will be gone in a few years and new players to love and hate will come along. Believe me, I can't wait.

[Nathan89]

Want to know who the biggest sidekick in NBA championship history is?

Bill Russell.


The arguiment against Kobe is Shaq was the go to guy. How many times was Bill Russell the go to guy? How about none? He was primarily a defensive anchor, and any big man could have won as many les with his stacked teams. Russell grabbed rebounds and sent an outlet pass and Cousy and Sharman ran the fast break. Havlicek and Sam Jones were no slouches either.

Here's some facts.

MJ is the greatest player in NBA history by majority opinion.
Kobe may be the best player since Jordan, again by opinion.
Duncan is probably a better player than Kobe, but it can't be proven either way, they play two different positions.
Kobe and Duncan will be gone in a few years and new players to love and hate will come along. Believe me, I can't wait.

[Venti Quattro]

5 rings, 2 Finals MVPs: more than enough to compensate for one regular season MVP. He's not done writing his career yet (okay, insert here spurfan jokes that he's done), and I fully expect him to have two more cracks at a 6th ring before he starts writing the end of his career.

Lots of people here are just butthurt that he's had such an accomplished career despite being a snitch, and having a rape case drop in his head. That's what you call hard work, determination and drive, folks.

[nevitt_&_smrek]

At least Duncan has won over Dirk in the playoffs. What about Kobe?

And your losing to the 8th seeded Grizzlies - so much to be proud of there.

[Deuce Bigalow]

[joshdaboss]

How many without Shaq or Pau Gasol? ROFL

[Roger Freemason Jr.]

Ask Phil Jackson if he would have rather had Duncan or Kobe on his team. I'm sure his answer will be the most efficient player of the decade, and not the SG who takes 65 shots to make 26 points.

[Venti Quattro]

Ask Phil Jackson if he would have rather had Duncan or Kobe on his team. I'm sure his answer will be the most efficient player of the decade, and not the SG who takes 65 shots to make 26 points.

He had Shaq, Bynum, Gasol, and Odom. Your argument is invalid.

[Roger Freemason Jr.]

Forgot to mention in their primes, my mistake.

Btw, don't mention Bynum, Gasol, or Odom. I know you're not comparing them to Duncan, but they really are rubbish in contrast.

[namlook]

Rings are a team accomplishment. I don't do team accomplishments when comparing individual players.

So if you compare Duncan and Malone the rings mean nothing? Yeah right.

[Roger Freemason Jr.]

So if you compare Duncan and Malone the rings mean nothing? Yeah right.

If you compare Duncan and Malone, you get a superior dominant power forward, and a way above average power forward.

[ezau]

And your losing to the 8th seeded Grizzlies - so much to be proud of there.

I smell skunk.

[ezau]

Lakers

most championships
most finals
most finals wins
most playoff wins

you really are delusional If you think the Spurs were the team of the decade

Kobe and Gasol are both winless against Dirk in the playoffs. Just saying

[ezau]

kobe>duncan, TD would be #2

Let Kobe win first against Dirk in the playoffs and then we'll talk.

[Venti Quattro]

ezau
hypocrite
turncoat
glory hunter
bashing the Mavs to no end before they won
now using the Mav card to insult the Lakers
losing to an 8th seed

[Giuseppe]

Let Kobe win first against Dirk in the playoffs and then we'll talk.

Uh, uh. None of that crapola. We're talking now:::

Kobe: 5

tired old bag Duncan: 4

[Giuseppe]

I smell skunk.

The Skunker!!!

[MR.SILVER&BLack]

since the spurs actually had a team in 05-07, Spurs would win 5, maybe more with Kobe

kobe would have won with over the hill horry, oberto, mohammed, elson, rasho. kobe couldnt do with brown and odom who both are better than everyone of the bigs i posted

with parker being a scoring PG he would have been useless with a ballhog like kobe. manu would have been able to play with kobe becasue hes a playmaker. bowen would have taken care of defense.

[MR.SILVER&BLack]

You really don't know anything about basketball.

yea that was established about him when he first joined the site. believe it or not his first posts where worse than they are now.

[Giuseppe]

kobe would have won with over the hill horry, oberto, mohammed, elson, rasho. kobe couldnt do with brown and odom who both are better than everyone of the bigs i posted

with parker being a scoring PG he would have been useless with a ballhog like kobe. manu would have been able to play with kobe becasue hes a playmaker. bowen would have taken care of defense.

Kobe: 5

tired old bag Duncan: 4

Stings, don't it?

tee, hee.

[Giuseppe]

Let us proceed...