The same could be said for Gervin and, arguably, Duncan.
If Spurs don't win in '99, do they get a new arena? Do they stay in San Antonio? Who knows.
And yet one flipped ... hmmm ... I guess that is pretty strong evidence it was that one single teammate rather than the issue with Robinson.
The same could be said for Gervin and, arguably, Duncan.
If Spurs don't win in '99, do they get a new arena? Do they stay in San Antonio? Who knows.
ahahahahahaha Without Duncan, that asshole is ringless. He should be kissing Duncan's feet and giving thanks to Tim Duncan constantly, instead of God. Unless he believes they are the same person, of course.
LOL @ Magua from Last of the Mohicans. Awesome! LOL also at "religious subjugation" . Priceless!
I think Magua has troll potential.
Duncan taught Robinson how to win. The only thing Dave ever taught Tim was that Edge pro-gel gives you a close, comfortable shave.
^
This.
He's a quiet leader, but his play spoke volumes. TD is probably the best PF ever too...Robinson is not in the same area code as some of the best C's.
But in 1999, the real leader was Mario Elie
Robby has always been a pussy, and while Duncan was already our go to guy, he wasn't the presence Elie was
Robinson always played on crap teams before teaming up with TD...I forgot.
Perhaps Robinson taught Duncan how to win, and TD just continued the legacy.
Elie = Robert Horry.
Maybe Horry was our team leader...or Manu...or SJax...or Willis as someone suggested.
Perhaps neither Tim or David deserve credit for leading the Spurs to any of those championships. Perhaps they just benefitted from being surrounded by talent superior to the rest of the league, and veteran leaders who could get them over the hump.
I'm seeing all of this differently now.![]()
Rodman's tenure with the Bulls is pretty strong evidence he wasn't the problem
or that he learnt his lesson?
btw, this happned to be aconvenient thread ... agenda anyone?
What lesson would that be? He was a winner before and after his Spurs days, and chances are he would've been a winner there too if not for Robinson's god-mongering
maybe ... or he was normal (detroit days - was pretty sane and only cared abt bball) .. san antonio .. started to go a bit crazy... and then under threat of phil and the bulls ... reined himself in ... since if he failed in SA and then failed in CHI, back to back, he would mostly be on his way out of the nba.
Of course this is all just conjecture just like your opinion ...
Gotta admit though it's pretty made to sabotage your own team rather than manning up and knocking D-Rob out or something. I'd respect that more imo tbh
A great leader knows how to develop his replacement by supporting him from the shadows. David allowed Tim to take the lead on both ends of the floor, and in doing so made Tim an MVP caliber player right out of college.
Some here have no idea about leadership as they've always been followers. Most won't understand leadership until they are well into their 30's.
^
Coming from someone who follows Koolaid man into every thread he makes.
This intent of this thread seems to have very little to do with interest in Timmy and Big Dave's leadership abilities.
who said anything about who got who a ring? all i say is bring Duncans 150 lb rookie ass against Robinson monster rookie body and DRob would have killed Timmy in every part of the game. Timmys footwork would have been against DR defense. DRob could have won a dunk contest.. i still love Timmy but DR would have pulled a Neal on him.
I wonder how many people actually watched David play vs. how many just spout hearsay.
There's no point in comparing the two. Spurs fans are spoiled to have transitioned from one legendary, dominating, HOF big to another... especially via draft. It may be a while before we see a team as winning as we've seen in the DR or TD eras.
Another proof that basketball, like tennis, 100m dash, archery and such, is an individual sport.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)