Page 67 of 114 FirstFirst ... 175763646566676869707177 ... LastLast
Results 1,651 to 1,675 of 2827
  1. #1651
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    NBA owners bringing the decades-long War on Employees (and on unions) to the NBA.

  2. #1652
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    “I don’t want any of my clients playing for Michael Jordan, Paul Allen, Robert Sarver, Dan Gilbert or Peter Holt,” said one agent. “We won’t sign with them, unless they’re willing to really overpay. That’s going to be the only way these hardline owners are going to land any free agents after the way they’ve handled these negotiations.”

    These small-market teams have a hard enough time trying to attract free agents. It won’t be any easier now thanks to the way the hardline owners have been depicted throughout this process.

    http://www.hoopsworld.com/nba-am-uni...ocus-on-system
    Empty threat.


  3. #1653
    Veteran cantthinkofanything's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    14,938
    boutons_deux bringing his crappy opinions and two bit inferences to the thread

  4. #1654
    Veteran BG_Spurs_Fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    5,931
    ^ Agreed - FAs go wherever the best offer comes from. No agent will convince a player to take a worse deal in order not to work with said owners.

    Pure bull .

  5. #1655
    The Great Unknown yavozerb's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    4,176
    Owners better start to negotiate or the season is gone. . .
    I'm just shocked at the number of people on this site that blame the players for the same thing you could easily blame the owners for. It is just awful logic. I'm also shocked at how you can't see what the owners are doing and how the players have made every concession; very large concessions & the owners not only fail to move forward, but threaten to move backwards?

    I agree the players have been unorganized and shuffled their feet some, but that is the only thing you can be upset about towards them IMO. Even then I have a hard time getting upset at that considering they did that because they had the (foolish) hope the owners wanted to negotiate in good faith. The owners are the greedy liars here and this CLEARLY falls on them IMO.

    I do not give a about the players future salary decreasing from there current average of 5+ mil...I keep hearing that the NBA is all about the players, but yet its the owners who put up a couple hundred mil. of there own money to secure the business that is the NBA. Yes, you have the glitzy houses and skyscrapers which is the NBA players, but the foundation lies with the owners and the risk they must take in running an organization. Its time for owners to shake things up, if it takes missing a season to do this I'm all for it...

  6. #1656
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    If that was the case, no FA would have ever gone to the Clippers.

  7. #1657
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    I do not give a about the players future salary decreasing from there current average of 5+ mil...I keep hearing that the NBA is all about the players, but yet its the owners who put up a couple hundred mil. of there own money to secure the business that is the NBA. Yes, you have the glitzy houses and skyscrapers which is the NBA players, but the foundation lies with the owners and the risk they must take in running an organization. Its time for owners to shake things up, if it takes missing a season to do this I all for it...
    You are en led to that opinion I just think its wrong. I also think its terrible logic to say this is on the players. Even if you truly believe what you say, the owners have already "shaken things up" by getting the players to drop BRI from 57% to 52%, and even 50% if they move on some of the ultra constrictive system issues (which they have already won as well). So you call the players idiots, but really it's the owners that don't give a crap about you and want to throw the season away. I understand your jealousy towards guys making lots of money to play ball, but that doesn't make your opinion have substance.

    Bottom line is, no current crop of players means no league. Dump these owners and a new crop will step up. They "put up their money" because it's big business and the players allow them the opportunity to make big money. In any job the owners take risks but it's rare that you get access to a product (the players) who afford you such a rare opportunity. Again, if they are losing money as they claim, these lower level franchises wouldn't be selling for an all time high.

  8. #1658
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    The path to an N.B.A. labor deal, and the end to a 131-day lockout, came into sharper focus Tuesday, with the players signaling for the first time that they would accept the league’s proposed 50-50 split of revenues.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/09/sp...e-lockout.html

    employers win, employees lose (for a long time), as always.

  9. #1659
    #21 timtonymanu's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    34,838
    LMAO Peter Holt.

    I guess he's trying to make up for handing out those ty contracts to and Bonner.

    But I'm with DPG. This is on the owners. Players have shown that they are willing to negotiate and actually give a about the fans and the season. I use to not care for either side but after hearing what has been going down, the players have given more. The owners think they can have it both ways which is bull . Players are still gonna lose this battle but at least I won't want to throw pitchforks at them like some of these owners (Holt included) and Stern.

  10. #1660
    Five. DesignatedT's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    20,362
    Just accept the damn deal. This in sucks.

  11. #1661
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Don't accept. For the owners: just negotiate a damn deal. Quit screwing everyone.

  12. #1662
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    For some perspective to recap where we are at:

    At the 50/50 BRI split, the players have conceded ~375 million per year. The owners stated losses (which keep in mind is worst case scenario since we know they are cooking the books and their actual losses are likely far less) for last year were ~300 million. So just in year one the players have at worst covered all the losses and given additional money back.

    If the owners get their way with a 57% for them, that would be over 5 BILLION in concessions over the 10 year proposal.

    Oh ya, the owners want all the system changes as well.


    Those greedy idiot players should jump on that.

  13. #1663
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    But owners take all the risks

  14. #1664
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Looks like the players have folded on BRI.

    Now what about all the other concessions?

    players are paying for NBA's greedy overexpansion. owners stupid overpaid contracts, beyond what the market and playing/coaching/mgmt talent can support.

  15. #1665
    The Great Unknown yavozerb's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    4,176
    Nobody is going to make these players sign anything...The owners are simply stating that if they wish to be part of the National Basketball Association these will be the stipulations and rules they must abide by. Not only is about recouping lost $ for the owners, its about creating a system where everyone has a viable chance at an NBA championship. The NBA was headed down the road of the MLB system which only rewards teams from big markets. This needs to stop now...I do not support the owners or players, but I do support equal opportunity for each organization to have a shot at a championship trophy without having to break the bank to do so...just my opinion

  16. #1666
    Five. DesignatedT's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    20,362
    In my eyes they are both greedy s with the amount of $ they both pull in. I dgaf who loses 2 million over the next 5 years when they have already made 20m in their lifetime. Choosing either side is re ed. Get a ing deal done, both of them because in the end neither of them is really getting "screwed" out of anything.

  17. #1667
    I am not redwood DJ Mbenga's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Post Count
    4,579
    the owners got more than their 300 million in losses. give a bit on system and its a done deal. of course i do not expect it to happen. once jordan got involved this will go to .

  18. #1668
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Except your opinion has been disproven repeatedly and you keep saying things like "they are doing this so every team has a viable shot at a le..." and that is so far from the truth when you look at reality under the current system plus what they are doing now.

    Again, I've said this numerous times and recently pundits agree, that the tax the owners are proposing HURTS compe iveness and widens the disparity from small to big markets. It has nothing to do with parity and everything to do with greed and a system that controls spending (I.e. costs) to Guarentee they make an absurd profit.

    By your logic, the players could flip it on the owners and say: "this is our proposal if you want to continue to use our talents for your gain."

  19. #1669
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    In my eyes they are both greedy s with the amount of $ they both pull in. I dgaf who loses 2 million over the next 5 years when they have already made 20m in their lifetime. Choosing either side is re ed. Get a ing deal done, both of them because in the end neither of them is really getting "screwed" out of anything.
    That is so wrong I don't know where to begin. Did you not read my post? We aren't talking "losing 2 million" we are talking about the players losing BILLIONS. How on Earth can you call the players greedy when they've conceded billions? Just because they refuse to eat a rape sandwhich so you can be entertained? It's ludicrious.

  20. #1670
    The Great Unknown yavozerb's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    4,176
    Did the players not counter offer the owners proposal with there own proposal? If the owners had there way there would be an NFL type system in place but the players can make more money and have more freedom outside of that system and therefore are against it..

  21. #1671
    I am not redwood DJ Mbenga's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Post Count
    4,579
    whatever happens i have the porn ready if a deal gets done. if not ill have to store it for next year.

  22. #1672
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    The players have tried to negotiate in good faith, the owners have not. The players have made concessions, the owners have not. The players plead to continue negotiating even though they are being pummeled, the owners threaten to make deals worse. The owners have ready massively won on both the system and BRI and they still refuse to budge at all to get a deal done.

  23. #1673
    Cinco TimmehC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    1,499
    So, the faction of owners being led by Jordan does know how "good" he is with decisions, right? Kwame Brown, Adam Morrison, etc...

  24. #1674
    Five. DesignatedT's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    20,362
    Lol the NBA system is still the best in pro-sports and will be even with what the owners are offering. NFL players have it 10 times worse.

  25. #1675
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Did the players not counter offer the owners proposal with there own proposal? If the owners had there way there would be an NFL type system in place but the players can make more money and have more freedom outside of that system and therefore are against it..
    Not really. I mean, it would be "an NFL type system" without "an NFL type system" revenue sharing, which is a huge part of why small market teams can be compe ive in the NFL.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •