Reply With Quote
LOL son typical.
"Kobe scores 33, lifts Lakers past Hornets in OT"
Never mind Bynum 25/18
It never stops...
Oh, and BR Hrnet
LOL son typical.
u mad son?
what a useless bricklayer
hornets did a fine job holdin dem lakers to a draw in regular time tbh, hornets been in good form recently tbqfh
Good article le. In overtime, Kobe 7 points, Bynum 0 points. le is accurate.
And scoring 33 points on 23 shot attempts is very efficient. Pretty impressive. Against a great Hornets team on the road, a team that's better than their record would lead you believe with wins at home against the likes of Dallas and Orlando and Boston. Against a fantastic young phenom like Marco Belinelli. Quite a performance.
Why not "Kobe goes 2 for 8 from 3, Lakers struggle to beat Hornets"?
JamStone delivers...
great hornets team
10 - 33
Every team beats a good team at times.
You are what your record says you are.
11 FTs is a bailout for another chucking episode. 2 for 8 shooting from 3 is not "very efficient".
Other than his FTs, he had 22 points on 23 shots.
Last edited by DMC; 03-15-2012 at 09:45 AM.
Also, look at the Spurs game, for example. The comments are "Spurs edge Magic amidst Howard speculation" and not "Parker scores 31 and 12, lifts Spurs past Magic",
^Only pussies & assholes play the free throw card, D.
Other espn game les:
"Humphries, Green help Nets snap losing streak"
"Gooden's triple-double lifts Bucks past Cavaliers"
"Frye-led Suns erase 13-point deficit to top Jazz"
Look at the ESPN hype machine catering to all of its superstars like Kris Humphries and Drew Gooden and Channing Frye. Such a shame.
Did you wash your vagina this morning?
I was showing you what it could have read, instead of pretending Kobe saved the Lakers when in reality his chucking from outside the arc is what helped put them in the hole to begin with, and never mind Bynum's 18 rebounds. Those are overrated.
Great job defending your "efficient" comment.
Only team hopping, disloyal ass old pedophiles pretend to set standards on the game forum of an opposing team.
" in the armor", tbh
33 points on 23 FGA is very efficient. Kobe generally needs 30 FGA or close to it to get 30 points. Since when do free throws not count as points? Is that a new rule? Why do they still shoot them then?
33 points on 23 FGA is 1.43 points per shot attempt. Very efficient. For perspective, Shaq is a career 1.47 points per shot attempt. Kobe was very efficient last night.
33 on 23 was pretty efficient. Very unlike Kobe.
Pretty accurate headline, considering he lead the Lakers in scoring and had 7 points in OT. Bynum had none in OT.
49 minutes? Wow...
Crucify 'em, Deads---En masse---Tree of Woe.
Crucify 'em, Deads---En masse---Tree of Woe.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
