Reply With Quote
denver never get bored of generating garbage contracts imho
5 years, 37 mil
denver never get bored of generating garbage contracts imho
His agent is one slick n!gga
are you kidding? that's cheap for his level of production
deep get deeper
it's quite a gamble..not saying it's a bad move but i could easily see it ending in disaster. he's at that age where he may or may not get any better, and was pretty injury prone a couple years ago. he's a 15 and 5 guy with an inconsistent outside shot, i think he'd be worth 7 mil but the injuries muddy the water a bit.
They'll trade him probably.
He really isn't that good and will only take shots away from Gallo and Affalo and play not defense in the meantime. He's not getting overpaid since the salary is fair for someone with his production but too many years IMO.
I like him... 37 million though? hmmm
got $40 million for one less year. It's not crazy money for what Chandler provides.
A better deal would have been 3 years 21 million.
When you look at what SF's like Marvin Williams, Trevor Ariza, Richard Jefferson, Hedo Turkoglu, Josh Childress, Charlie Villanueva, Thaddeus Young, Ron Artest, etc. command, I think it's a pretty good bet that he does way better than that on the market this summer.
no, they traded nene to sign him.
Oh wait, sarcasm?
Yes ^
You're right. He probably will. But they're gonna get frustrated with him after awhile.
Exactly what I was thinking. Besides, if he under-performs that contract, they will just ship him out the way they did Nene.
was a horrible contract
dude's only 24. Mostly upside imo
We STAACKKEEDDDD!@@
very tradeable contract
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
